Reviews tagging 'Sexual violence'

Les sept morts d'Evelyn Hardcastle by Stuart Turton

68 reviews

valpyre's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

[audiobook]
2.5 stars

i gotta say, the immense fatphobia and ableist language pretty much soured this entire book for me. 

i found the parts past the halfway mark the most interesting, basically most of the parts where things are being revealed and bishop collected concrete information. but overall this was super tedious to me, even with the reveal/explanation of the bigger picture. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

iviarelle's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.0

I really wanted to like this. I tried. I gave it every chance I could find it in me to give.

I just kinda can't. And it's for one primary and one secondary reason.

Firstly, and most obviously, this book doesn't offer its female characters any depth. Every woman on the page is a one note tune. Even in the twists that involve a woman, they're the most overused and unsubtle kind of tropes.  If depth is attributed to a woman, it's only through telling us she's more, not by showing us. And that's a problem.

The second problem is... Less widely recognized. The men in this story don't get a whole lot of depth either, which is a little obfuscated by the much wider range of types of men that exist in the story. But, some of those men are horrific tropes walking.

Take Ravencourt: every moment spent with him is spent thinking about how fat he is. Almost every paragraph includes some remark about shameful gross obesity or how difficult his being shamefully obese makes it to walk down a flat hallway. While it's true that being fat is hard, there's WAY too much judgement and downright fatphobia or fatmisia in every line of the parts where he's mentioned.

Take the drug dealing doctor, the privileged rapist whose mother buys his way out of trouble again and again... It's all part of a pattern and not one that flatters the author's sender of creativity or knowledge of human nature.

You could argue that the point of the story is to be flat and unsubtle, but I don't buy it. I think this could have been much more interesting if the author had given a damn. And giving a damn is the least we should expect from people or books these days.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

thatpine's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

I got this book as a present from a friend who raved about it. I, however, did not find it nearly as worthwhile to read. 

I found the ultimate premise at the end of the book to be intriguing and a new idea, but the amount of energy and frustration it took me to get there was far too much. Reading in some spots was a chore, and there were so many thing happening at once it got confusing. Further, the rules for the plot I found to be lacking and not clear at all, making the story even more muddled. 

The fat shaming was easily the worst part. 

If you like mysteries that are not necessarily the “norm” and can enjoy a slow pace, once you get halfway through it does get better.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

tesskt's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

confusedetc's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Better to read in one go because it can get a bit convoluted otherwise.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

emmaflood's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Brilliant mystery with a timeline hopping twist. Excellently written had me up until 2am furiously reading. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lezzieborden's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark hopeful mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

I regret that I can’t give more than 5 to this one. Exactly the kind of weird puzzle story I love, and I’ve never seen an Agatha Christie-style mystery start advocating for prison abolition before, which was refreshing. Felt like I was playing a late 1980s point-and-click detective game in the best way possible, like I was participating in the solve even though I obviously was just reading a book.

Despite the 1920s English setting, there’s a lot in this book that reminds me of Twin Peaks. Not necessarily the plot (beyond “There’s a murder and the guy meant to solve it doesn’t have a normal relationship to time & reality”), but in the tone & weirdness. Reading the reviews of people who hated this book confirm that for me. If you don’t hate being confused sometimes when the main character doesn’t have all the answers, you’ll like it.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mariekejee's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

so I liked basically 70% of this book a lot. I'll start with that part. First of all, I think the concept of this book is so clever and, although it can be confusing at times, I thought it was very fun as well. I think it was also written well, although I do have some problems with the ending. I'll get to that later.

I loved the mysteries! I'm generally not a fan of thrillers, but this one kept me hooked and I enjoyed it quite a lot. That is not to say that it was super thriller-y, but there were definitely parts of the book that felt very suspenseful. I loved the chapters where the narrator inhabited the body of the cop - although partly because of how nice it was to read about a character with actual friends.

I also liked how the narrator changed in each body, although it could've been incorporated more into the voice or tone of the narrator.

So to the things I don't like: the ending, and the fatphobia. I'll start with the fatphobia: I understand the reasons why the writer wrote a (fat) character with mobility issues, and I have absolutely no problems with writers including fat characters. In fact, I welcome it! But the way this was written was honestly disgusting.

Ravencourt is a very fat man, and suffers from mobility issues because of it. Throughout his chapters, the narrator wants to let us know roughly every page how hard this is for him, how much he hates it, how disgusting he feels. I understand that part of the awful comments are supposed to be internalised shame/fatphobia from the character itself, but there is a lot of it, and some of it really cannot be attributed to Ravencourt himself.

" 'I hear you crying,' I say, attempting to push a sympathetic smile onto my face. It's a difficult thing to achieve with somebody else's mouth, especially when there's so much flesh to move around."

And this is a relatively tame quote, at that. Not only does the narrator keep making fat jokes, or comments on how hard it is to be in a fat body with mobility issues, or how this is possibly the worst thing to happen to him; throughout Ravencourts chapters, the other people at Blackheath all seem to need to include the word "fat" as a slur when mentioning him, betraying just how "important" of a character trait (or flaw, rather) it seems to be. 

Ravencourt is basically every fat stereotype in one, except that he is smart and vain. I really wish the writer had written a fat character without mocking him to the extent he does. He doesn't have to be a nice, or good, or decent character - most are not - just not the lazy fatphobic stereotype that he is.

Another gripe with the book is the ending. Up until chapter 55, I loved it. There were plotholes that needed adressing, and they were all adressed in the end, but it really left me a bit hollow. I thought I would feel at least satisfied when the murder was resolved, but I really felt shitty afterwards. For the most part I was able to follow along with the narrator and figure some things out for myself, but the final reveal felt really sudden.

This is basically just a long, ranty list explaining I didn't enjoy the ending. Although it might just be preference on my part.
 
So why give it 3.5 stars? It deals with some interesting themes, the concept is really cool and it kept me entertained throughout most of it. If it weren't for the fatphobia and the ending that left a somewhat sour taste in my mouth, it would've been a five stars read for sure.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...