stevia333k's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative inspiring

4.0

I didn't really understand this book that well. However, there was a part at around 75% where they were analyzing news reports on trans people & the popularity of those reports alongside era typical transphobia, and that was helpful (especially since I saw a lawyer TikTok talk about the difference between Jorgensen's coverage & today's coverage & it was like boo bitch)

Anyways there's also 2 parts that were helpful too:
1. the racist enslavement origins of gynecology helped explain why that field gets very cissexist & pro-natal & anti-choice (as well as why white women buy into rationalization & conservativism)
2. Discussion of comparing enslavement-to-freedom narratives with gender transition narratives.

The book pointed out why Foucault is unreliable. The book uses language similar to Jacques Donzelot's "The Policing Of Families" that was an awkward contradiction. I will say this book hammered it into my head that enslaved black women were used as wet nurses for white kids. Considering Donzelot's book traces the school to prison pipeline back to regulating wet nurses in the ancien regime, this means the systems have major differences (for example, Donzelot's book really only mentions race once when describing an exceptional defense given for an Algerian kid).

So overall the book was good, though some parts such as the "boys don't cry" movie review felt like literature class reports. This book 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...