Reviews

In Defense of Looting: A Riotous History of Uncivil Action by Vicky Osterweil

josienaron's review

Go to review page

4.0

lost me a little in the middle with the framing metaphor but damn she really brought it home in the end

rosa_setigera's review

Go to review page

challenging hopeful informative medium-paced

4.0

phenomenecology's review

Go to review page

4.25

Excellent, thorough work on topics simultaneously prescient and historical. I would recommend to anyone interested in diving deeper into the violent history of police and the liberating nature looting can have. Subverting the property relationship in America- a relationship that begins with the kidnapping and enslavement of Africans and the genocide and displacement of indigenous groups- is necessary if we ever want to see a world worthy of the label “free.”

charlieb1092's review

Go to review page

5.0

This is a great book. Delving into a history that is not explored within our white supremacist educational system, it describes a long history of righteous looting and rioting. The fact that the first acts of “looting” were enslaved people “stealing themselves away” from their enslavers is something everyone should keep in mind whenever the media and ruling class call out looters as “thugs” and “criminals”.

I’m positive that everyone who posted a one star review has never had a single thought that wasn’t spoon fed to them by the existing power structure which we currently live under.

jennifersantiago14's review

Go to review page

Returned to the library 

booksonabike's review

Go to review page

5.0

This book didn't change my opinion on riots and looting. But, I supported there use by the oppressed to get attention and retaliation. In the modern case, they are being used to draw attention to the murders of Black people, because some white people are more enraged by the destruction of a Target, than a Black life.

What this book added for me is a more historical understanding of how looting and riots have been used in the past. It chronicles a lot of violence against Blacks in America, as well as other minorities, such as the Chinese Americans in the turn of the century. This helps round out the very white washed history of our country that I learned in school. It also gave me a head full of more topics that I want to delve deeper into, such as the Combahee River Raid.

Another focus of the book, is how main media outlets, have been the white voice inciting violence, and bending the story to suit police or the white government along the way. A good example of this is the Tulsa Race Riot which was encouraged by the newspaper printing instructions the day it started to lynch Black people that night. Lynching images were published often in papers and "serve to normalize white supremacist violence."

Police have also participated in or stood idle and allowed white riots throughout American History, just as they do today, when armed proud boys are making a scene.

cloudss's review

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

4.5

interesting view of civil rights movement and non non violent resistance. great start to answer to main objections to looting from the jump. interesting reframing of rioting. tulsa part was most surprising and did enjoy the discussion around it. bit too much I can't comment on this bc am not black from the author but otherwise enjoyable 

absolutelyfatal's review

Go to review page

informative tense fast-paced

4.5

majkf's review

Go to review page

5.0

i can see why racists are pissing their pants over this book and i love it

so informative and gracefully steeped in revolutionary theory that weaves the history of property & protest with criticism of the ahistorical contemporary narratives that serve to suppress social movements

will definitely be adding to my list of books to return to over and over

thefriendlyabyss's review

Go to review page

5.0

The severe reaction towards this book and Vicky’s arguments within seem to offer at least some evidence of the merits of her point. Theft of property and more specifically looting is seen today as a sin more serious than murder and often marks the person who engages in such act as marked for death.

The unwillingness of many to question why we value stuff more than people’s lives is only outshone by the all the subtle and less subtle ways the system brutally keeps people in line. It’s the age old conundrum that an ideal world doesn’t require police or the military or corporations or even government. Perfect examples of all of these institutions would be outfits engaged in the mission of working towards their own demise.

It’s a wonder why the system fights back so forcibly. As Vicky as illustrated here, there is no form of legitimate protest. “Legitimate” protests aren’t at all. Progress has never been made without making people vastly uncomfortable.