Scan barcode
kralaa's review
1.0
Woof. This was awful. The supposed plot of this book (caretaker tells tale of old Hollywood star falling in love with younger man and discovering he intends to kill her) only takes up about 10% of the book. The rest is reserved for a constant name dropping of old movie stars I’ve never heard of. All the characters were awful and flat. I’m happy it was a short read.
barbarianlibarian's review against another edition
1.0
hated it, sooooo boring. i needed a library audiobook for my phone so i decided to give it a try. counted down the minutes til it ended and tried not to space out too much as i attempted to listen as i walked my dog.
vnavarro's review against another edition
dark
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.5
helpfulsnowman's review against another edition
2.0
Okay, not my favorite Chuck Palahniuk book. I'm a pretty big fan, read ALL of his books and have seen him speak twice, which is a blast if you ever get the chance.
Like always, he delivers in terms of a quick read, some social commentary, and a little bit of humor thrown in the mix (see: anything attributed to Walter Winchell in this book).
That said, the story is so-so. The book really hits its stride about a hundred pages in, which is over halfway.
If you're going to read this book, here are some things that might help you enjoy it more:
1. Feel free to completey ignore anything in boldface. These will be brand names and names of celebrities. Chuck Palahniuk does this sort of thing in books, for example, the inclusion of esoteric medical terms in Choke, to slow readers down and make them pay attention to what's going on. So, don't get caught up in the names is all I'm saying, don't let that ruin it for you the way it seems to for so many others. Take the boldface as a sign saying, "You do not need to remember this person."
2. Accept that this is not Fight Club. Everybody wants Chuck Palahniuk to rewrite Fight Club. Say what you will about his use of forumla, but Palahniuk is a writer who is constantly trying new things, sometimes with great success (for example, in the much-underrated Rant) and sometimes with less success. But if you love Fight Club for its testosterone, snappy angry youth one-liners, or ready-for-the-screen action, look to another book.
3. A book being short does not mean that you are being ripped off. His books tend to be short, faster reads. I like that. I don't see this as a laziness on the author's part or a disadvantage. He is a rabid revisionist, and edits each line over and over rather than stuffing a book with crap.
His last couple of books haven't been my favorite, but the amount of work that goes into them is evident and appreciated.
Like always, he delivers in terms of a quick read, some social commentary, and a little bit of humor thrown in the mix (see: anything attributed to Walter Winchell in this book).
That said, the story is so-so. The book really hits its stride about a hundred pages in, which is over halfway.
If you're going to read this book, here are some things that might help you enjoy it more:
1. Feel free to completey ignore anything in boldface. These will be brand names and names of celebrities. Chuck Palahniuk does this sort of thing in books, for example, the inclusion of esoteric medical terms in Choke, to slow readers down and make them pay attention to what's going on. So, don't get caught up in the names is all I'm saying, don't let that ruin it for you the way it seems to for so many others. Take the boldface as a sign saying, "You do not need to remember this person."
2. Accept that this is not Fight Club. Everybody wants Chuck Palahniuk to rewrite Fight Club. Say what you will about his use of forumla, but Palahniuk is a writer who is constantly trying new things, sometimes with great success (for example, in the much-underrated Rant) and sometimes with less success. But if you love Fight Club for its testosterone, snappy angry youth one-liners, or ready-for-the-screen action, look to another book.
3. A book being short does not mean that you are being ripped off. His books tend to be short, faster reads. I like that. I don't see this as a laziness on the author's part or a disadvantage. He is a rabid revisionist, and edits each line over and over rather than stuffing a book with crap.
His last couple of books haven't been my favorite, but the amount of work that goes into them is evident and appreciated.
rickies0329's review against another edition
challenging
funny
mysterious
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
0.5
undermeyou's review against another edition
4.0
This is definitely my least favorite of Palahniuk’s books. Honestly, every time the name dropping began, I started to skim. But actual story line and language is in line with the rest of his work.
runsonespresso's review against another edition
3.0
Probably my least favorite Palahniuk book so far. started off slow and didn't move quickly. Figured out the ending. slightly disappointed.
naomilemoyne's review against another edition
3.0
Still not sure how to feel about this book. Amused? Confused? Bombarded by proper nouns? It made me laugh at loud, so that deserves at least 3 stars, I think.
kezla's review against another edition
dark
funny
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.5