Reviews

Archivist Wasp by Nicole Kornher-Stace

baldwinme40's review

Go to review page

5.0

This was a weird little book and I loved it! A good Halloweentimes read with all those ghosties. No romance is the best part!!

Writing suffered from interior monologues in the middle of action but that's something I have trouble avoiding in my own writing so I can't complain too much.

Also, do most ghosts ever talk or not? The book seemed unable to make up its mind in the first part.

I don't really care though. I enjoyed this book heartily.

silvern's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

Two different stories in one telling. I feel like I should have more of an opinion but I don’t. 

spiffyname's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark medium-paced

3.0

beelo's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional medium-paced
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

Wow. Incredible. Such a unique take on ghosts and a post-apocalyptic setting. I had so much fun reading the ideas on the page even if the subject matter was depressing. The characters felt so real and it was plain to see how their environments impacted their thought processes. There were a lot of things we don’t get an explanation for on how they started or came to be. To me, it made sense because how would Wasp know??
With how much the Catchkeep-Priest lied to all of them, I wouldn’t expect her to have a whole lot of reliable information about her culture.
Plus, I’ve heard the sequel answers a ton of questions so maybe that’s why it didn’t bother me while reading.
I do wish we got more of an explanation for the whole seeing memories thing!!!!
I hope to read Latchkey and Firebreak soon!! 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sleeping_roses's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

riahwamby's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

This was such a cool take on ghosts and the world building was so interesting. I don’t feel like I ever fully connected with either character, but the story was enough to keep me engaged. 

ameyawarde's review

Go to review page

3.0

I really loved the beginning of this. It felt very different to any other YA book I've read, and the originality was exciting. However, I feel like the further I got into it, the less interesting it got, and parts felt too rushed. Normally I race to review things right after I read them, but I let this one sit with me overnight to try to figure it out. I *do* like it, but not as much as I thought I would in the beginning... but at the same time, it still gets big points for originality.. and for what I thought would be the plot twist *didn't* happen (and I don't often get tricked by authors, so kudos).. it's just.. ahhh. There are a few things I'd change, and I didn't like how we never learned how the archivist position got involved with the fight to the death or a few other things I wont mention bc of spoilers.

Basically, I did like this book, and I very much loved the originality of several parts.

ariiw's review

Go to review page

i started reading this for a book club and then decided i didn't care

deerisms's review

Go to review page

4.0

Initially I became interested in Archivist Wasp because I liked the cover, but what I found inside was a breath of fresh air in the crowded post-apocalyptic genre. The world building was extremely well done, and I loved how complex the characters were, especially Wasp herself. She was flawed, bitter, yet still had compassion even though it was never rewarded. The plot was solid, the tiny twists were interesting
Spoilerlike this world actually being Earth
with no romantic bullshit forced in either. Nicole Kornher-Stace has a unique voice, and I'm definitely going to keep an eye out for what else she does with it.

beefthedwarf's review

Go to review page

dark emotional hopeful mysterious sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

Archivist Wasp - 4.21

Archivist Wasp is described as a genre blend, and I definitely agree. Post-apocalyptic fantasy and sci-fi meld together in an impactful exploration of grief, connection, and finding purpose in life. What happens when a futuristic supersoldier dies and finds himself wandering in an abstract, labyrinthine world of the dead? What happens when a thousand years later, he finds a way to talk to a human again — a ghost hunter, ghost killer, from the world that grew from the ashes of his own?

I picked up Archivist Wasp as a recommendation for its aro-ace. In text, without word of god, no one is explicitly described as aro or ace. Instead, it just doesn't come up at all. It is truly refreshing to not have romance hovering over the story, even to point out its absence. I never had to feel tense, wondering if the friendship and trust budding between our protags would become a hamfisted endgame relationship. From a technical perspective, this also meant that the author had to convince us the characters cared about each other without using attraction — and succeeded, obviously. You’d think more authors could do this, but… bleh.

For about 75% of the book, I felt like a lot of stuff was “just happening”, but it later culminated in a big character moment for Wasp. Events led to feelings rather than other events. The surreal, abstract nature of the spirit world could dazzle readers or befuddle them in equal measure — it really just depends how much you enjoy “vibes” and things not being outright explained.

Exhaustive Review (spoilers):

World/System/Premise
Engagement: 5
Worldbuilding: 3

The world of Archivist Wasp is immediately interesting. Kornher-Stace feeds us bits of Wasp’s post-apocalyptic world through casual mentions and imprecations against her world’s constellation-based pantheon. She replaces commonly known idioms and metaphors for Wasp’s world’s equivalents, consequently teaching us what those ideas mean in this setting.

However, I feel like there were a lot of things about the ghosts and spirit realm that didn’t feel very well explained. A lot of this can be handwaved by the “abstract labyrinth” style of afterlife, or the fact that there are more books in the NKS Cinematic Universe that may delve into this further. Allegedly, the third book in the AW series will deal more with the ghosts and how they came to be! (source: Reddit AMA). BUT, since the ghosts and the spirit realm had such a key role in the dramatic resolution of the story, AND since NKS kindof-sortof started explaining the origins of the harvesting knife but not really at the very very end, I took a few points off of Worldbuilding. There are better ways to leave things (as of yet) unexplained without making questions feel unanswered.

It’s absolutely not a deal-breaker, though. Archivist Wasp’s world is still wonderful..

Writing Style / Prose
Spelling / grammar / formatting: 5
Vocabulary and Sentence Structure: 3
Internal / External Dialogue: 5
Emotional Impact: 4

I hate that I have to rate traditionally published books for spelling, grammar, and format errors, but here we are. Archivist passed with flying colors. I’m sure this has to do with the book being 8 years old. The quality of books post-2020 is just… euch.

However, NKS’s disjointed and choppy writing voice (not bad on its own) had its own complications. I often felt myself getting lost in the page, my eyes glazing over, trying to make sense of what was happening on the page. The dramatic scene of the dead Archivist severing Wasp’s thread completely lost its impact on me because I couldn’t for the life of me parse the miles-long sentence describing it.

Overall, however, important scenes succeeded at feeling important, and I found myself misting up at the end.

Plot Flow
Pacing: 4
Scene Structure: 4
Plot vs. Character Impact: 3
Approach to Climax: 4

Due to the abstract nature of the spirit realm, and the unexplained origins and behavior of the ghosts and harvesting knife, the approach to the climax + the climax itself felt a bit like… things happening, for no reason. However! Due to the fact that there are other books in the NKS-CU that currently touch on or will touch on these topics in the future, I chose to be generous with my rating.

The Ending
Satisfaction: 4
Resolution of loose ends: 5

Again, due to the promise of answered questions in future books, I chose to be generous with my rating. I’ll treat most unanswered questions as future plot devices.

It was satisfying watching Wasp complete her journey not to escape, and not to prove herself, but because there was finally someone she cared about enough to fight for. The downfall of the Catchkeep-priest was also -chefs kiss-, even if it felt a bit too easy. A complete religious schism would have been a whole ‘nother book, though.

Characterization
Personality, Goals, and Motivations: 5
Interpersonal Relationships: 4.5

I rarely split these ratings in half, but I made an exception here. On a technical level, the interpersonal relationships were a 5. We have Foster and the ghost, which were a sublime example of platonic soulmates, and the budding trust and friendship between the ghost and Wasp. But I kept desperately wanting to see more about Wasp and her interactions with other upstarts! I wanted her to interact more with Becca, or have an interaction with the previous Archivist that wasn’t just an ambush.

I feel like each character was carefully, exquisitely crafted, their desires and behaviors well thought-out and distinct. I liked the methodical way the ghost found Wasp’s vulnerabilities and exploited them, and how it felt to figure that out. It’s very rewarding!

~Vibes~
Connection To Readers: 5
Originality: 4
The Itch™: 4

If you have a little voice in your head that constantly tells you that you’re a hopeless fuck up that ruins every good thing you ever try to do, then congrats! Wasp is you.

I am shaking NKS’s hand because — oh my god. I barely ever see accurate portrayals of self loathing in media. A lot of stories show a bad character being mean to our protag and that protag letting that get to them. Not that this never happens, but… in real life, it’s not always so linear. Wasp knows the Catchkeep-priest is a loathsome little hater who’s just saying things to put her down, so his words alone don’t get to her, but we see how his abuse affects her in other ways. She constantly doubts herself, puts herself down for mistakes before she even makes them, is prone to frustrated fits of anger where she insults herself over and over — these are the signs of a teenager who was never raised with kind words. A+ characterizations, and I’ll be billing you for my therapy, NKS.

While I didn’t feel like AW was mindblowingly original or worthy of brain worms status, it handled its genre and plot beats with skill. It avoided being tropey or predictable, and came across as very authentic.

Average Score: 4.21


There’s No Accounting For Taste!
The bonus round where I arbitrarily add or take away points based on my own personal preferences.

Pros:
Characters of color — +1 (sure, most of them die, but it IS a ghost story)
Accurate depiction of injuries — +1
A pantheon (I’m a slut for pantheons) — +1
NO ROMANCE (air horn) — +2

Cons:
Dead puppies — -1 (not at -2 because I get it I GET IT they were important for the parallels between them and the Latchkey children and the upstarts!! But did NKS really have to make that comment about the bag of stones?)
Remember how I said I was being generous not deducting points for certain things because they might be explained in other books? Well since this is my NAFT segment, I’m charging tax on those points I didn’t deduct. — -2 

5 for, 3 against.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings