Scan barcode
nicky_nick_21's review against another edition
emotional
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
jemimahgracee's review against another edition
adventurous
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
joelminor's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.0
This was unfortunately one of the more poorly written books I’ve read in a long time. The characters are unrealistic, the plot is predictable though very hard to follow, and the writing felt amateurish. The world building was way too detailed to easily follow but also very “level 1” (the idea that each kingdom had universal personality traits that the author had to tell rather than show, for example. The audiobook narrator made the writing worse, not better. Her intense emphasis on certain words underscored the stilted dialogue, I was constantly struggling to figure out what was dialogue and what was monologue, and I kept having to adjust the volume because of the intense fluctuations in her voice.
I had high hopes for this book because I am a connosieur of fantasy books with non-Western settings and bases for their magic systems but this one was a definite disappointment.
I had high hopes for this book because I am a connosieur of fantasy books with non-Western settings and bases for their magic systems but this one was a definite disappointment.
pathetichobbit's review against another edition
adventurous
funny
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
caite811's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
ashley409's review against another edition
This is probably a great book, but at 62% through I have zero connection to the character and honestly I just don’t care what happens.
jesslynn's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
jennderqueer's review against another edition
5.0
This book is terrific. Sylvia is in hiding in a remote village after a horrific attack killed her whole family and razed her kingdom. Quite by accident she finds herself in the cross hairs of the Nizahl Heir and is forced into competing for the honor of the king who murdered her family - while doing her best to keep him from finding out who she really is.
everybody's review against another edition
2.0
Another interesting one and I have to say that I think this rating is far more subjective than my others typically are because there are a lot of great aspects to this book. It's just that the aspects that I value most have fallen by the wayside in this one.
While this book is technically just another enemy-to-lovers fantasy romance built from all the same core building blocks, there is so much more to this story than calling it that feels like a disservice and doesn't properly represent the breadth of the story.
It explores a large number of its different fictional cultures. The world isn't just a thin veneer covering the emptiness of the background like in most of these books.
The book also tries to explore different characters beyond a cardboard cutout characterization and actually tries to create different and nuanced individuals.
But now the dreaded "but" has to follow.
The book is positively stuffed full of tools the author uses copiously to steer her characters along the plot she wants.
This leads to a ton of very forced and unbelievable situations which are still technically covered by the infinitely flexible rules the author has set up for herself to excuse basically anything.
The main tool she uses for this is the MC's blocked magic which is only blocked if it suits the author and can be arbitrarily powerful without any good reason. It's somehow emotion-related as these things so often are but this leads to lots of obvious inconsistencies that I could point to and say "Why did or didn't her magic work in this other situation then?"
Even though the author already has built herself an excuse for almost anything with this there are nonetheless a whole collection of other similar tools she also uses for the same purpose. I guess the idea was that if you have multiple excuses it's not as obvious as if you always fall back on the same one?
Anyway, I find this kind of thing incredibly frustrating and it very much takes me out of a story.
The second major enjoyment killer for me was the MC herself. I seem to encounter the flaw I am going to describe constantly recently. Maybe this is a more prevalent flaw in more recent writing but maybe I just got unlucky and stumbled across a chain of books like this.
The flaw I am talking about is the MC starting out as this hardened, broken, and cynical outcast who is in hiding, isolation, retirement, or whathaveyou. I like this kind of character very much. It provides plenty of opportunity for nuance and ambiguous morals in combination with emotional trauma and/or suffering which always draws me in.
The trend I was alluding to earlier is the tendency of these types of characters instead of getting wiser and more mature they devolve, they get more naive, and typically also become outright stupid.
I don't mind these types of characters recognizing that there are people worth fighting for, and that nihilism is a dead end you have to escape from. That if you don't try and give it your all you have no right to complain or whatever. All this good stuff. You know what I am talking about. But if in the process the MC keeps making one obviously stupid decision after another with this motivation as the excuse, typically to get the plot moving to wherever the author wants it to go, it completely disconnects me from the MC which is the worst thing that can happen with these kinds of books.
I just can not understand this tendency of authors to have a mature and world-weary character forget about all the painful lessons they learned over their lifetime and become this blue-eyed goodie-two-shoes with no cunning or understanding at all.
I know the central point of a story like this is the romance and not the political intrigue surrounding it but I need the surrounding to fit together consistently to not be constantly distracted from the purpose of the story by inconsistencies and contradictions.
Another more basic problem is that the book sometimes describes chains of reasoning that have no logical connections whatsoever. It reads kind of like "The sun is shining today therefore I have to buy 2 new chewing gums, sacrifice a goat, and then dig a hole" or something like this to me. This is of course an exaggeration, but even without being that extreme, unconnected chains of reasoning like this still break my immersion with this "huh?" moment where the only way of explaining what I just read requires me to look at the meta-motivation of the author for writing it.
This is of course not at all what I want as a reader. Thinking of the author's motivation to excuse inconsistencies and illogical leaps in logic or emotion is just completely immersion-breaking.
And this is what essentially killed my enjoyment of this book despite it having so many commendable characteristics that should place it above most other books in the fantasy romance genre.
It is a sad example of how the amount of effort put into a thing doesn't necessarily correlate with the quality of the result even given a higher skill level.
It pains me to say but this could have been a better story by being worse at fantasy.
I think this book suffers from a wrong allocation of resources. By investing in such an extensive and ambitious world, the book has not enough juice left to build a consistent plot inside it.
While this book is technically just another enemy-to-lovers fantasy romance built from all the same core building blocks, there is so much more to this story than calling it that feels like a disservice and doesn't properly represent the breadth of the story.
It explores a large number of its different fictional cultures. The world isn't just a thin veneer covering the emptiness of the background like in most of these books.
The book also tries to explore different characters beyond a cardboard cutout characterization and actually tries to create different and nuanced individuals.
But now the dreaded "but" has to follow.
The book is positively stuffed full of tools the author uses copiously to steer her characters along the plot she wants.
This leads to a ton of very forced and unbelievable situations which are still technically covered by the infinitely flexible rules the author has set up for herself to excuse basically anything.
The main tool she uses for this is the MC's blocked magic which is only blocked if it suits the author and can be arbitrarily powerful without any good reason. It's somehow emotion-related as these things so often are but this leads to lots of obvious inconsistencies that I could point to and say "Why did or didn't her magic work in this other situation then?"
Even though the author already has built herself an excuse for almost anything with this there are nonetheless a whole collection of other similar tools she also uses for the same purpose. I guess the idea was that if you have multiple excuses it's not as obvious as if you always fall back on the same one?
Anyway, I find this kind of thing incredibly frustrating and it very much takes me out of a story.
The second major enjoyment killer for me was the MC herself. I seem to encounter the flaw I am going to describe constantly recently. Maybe this is a more prevalent flaw in more recent writing but maybe I just got unlucky and stumbled across a chain of books like this.
The flaw I am talking about is the MC starting out as this hardened, broken, and cynical outcast who is in hiding, isolation, retirement, or whathaveyou. I like this kind of character very much. It provides plenty of opportunity for nuance and ambiguous morals in combination with emotional trauma and/or suffering which always draws me in.
The trend I was alluding to earlier is the tendency of these types of characters instead of getting wiser and more mature they devolve, they get more naive, and typically also become outright stupid.
I don't mind these types of characters recognizing that there are people worth fighting for, and that nihilism is a dead end you have to escape from. That if you don't try and give it your all you have no right to complain or whatever. All this good stuff. You know what I am talking about. But if in the process the MC keeps making one obviously stupid decision after another with this motivation as the excuse, typically to get the plot moving to wherever the author wants it to go, it completely disconnects me from the MC which is the worst thing that can happen with these kinds of books.
I just can not understand this tendency of authors to have a mature and world-weary character forget about all the painful lessons they learned over their lifetime and become this blue-eyed goodie-two-shoes with no cunning or understanding at all.
I know the central point of a story like this is the romance and not the political intrigue surrounding it but I need the surrounding to fit together consistently to not be constantly distracted from the purpose of the story by inconsistencies and contradictions.
Another more basic problem is that the book sometimes describes chains of reasoning that have no logical connections whatsoever. It reads kind of like "The sun is shining today therefore I have to buy 2 new chewing gums, sacrifice a goat, and then dig a hole" or something like this to me. This is of course an exaggeration, but even without being that extreme, unconnected chains of reasoning like this still break my immersion with this "huh?" moment where the only way of explaining what I just read requires me to look at the meta-motivation of the author for writing it.
This is of course not at all what I want as a reader. Thinking of the author's motivation to excuse inconsistencies and illogical leaps in logic or emotion is just completely immersion-breaking.
And this is what essentially killed my enjoyment of this book despite it having so many commendable characteristics that should place it above most other books in the fantasy romance genre.
It is a sad example of how the amount of effort put into a thing doesn't necessarily correlate with the quality of the result even given a higher skill level.
It pains me to say but this could have been a better story by being worse at fantasy.
I think this book suffers from a wrong allocation of resources. By investing in such an extensive and ambitious world, the book has not enough juice left to build a consistent plot inside it.