Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.63 AVERAGE
3.63 AVERAGE
A man enters an anonymous competition to design a memorial for 9/11 in New York. His design of a garden is chosen and when it is revealed that his name is Mohammed Khan, all hell breaks loose from the american public. The racism and hurtful comments directed at him and Islam by the public made me want to throw this book sometimes it made me so angry. A really good look at the high emotions surrounding this event and the hateful opinions some people can spew.
A more accurate rating would be 2.5 stars. I wanted to like this more and while there are aspects that I enjoyed, overall, it left much to be desired. There are several plotlines and I can just imagine this being turned into a movie eventually. The main plotline involving Mohammad Khan and his design was the more fleshed out and through of them all. It was also the only one that kept me engaged. And it bothers me that female characters who are single or widowed or divorced need to find that "third act" romance or fling to complete their character. It's unnecessary 90% of the time and it was definitely unnecessary here. The things I did like however is the use of media in fanning the flames of racial and religious intolerance. The immigrant experience in America is explored nicely and with care, especially after September 11.
wonderful--loved the journalism, the true fallible characters.
Great plot hampered by a writer who could use a really good editor. Alas, characters are flat, and the author really loves to twist a metaphor until it screams. The story deserved better!
Pretty much hated this. SPOLIERS IN THE REVIEW
Even the premise of the book is hokum. There's a contest to design a memorial to the 9/11 attacks and submissions are anonymous from the jury. A Muslim wins....
Essentially if you're the kind of person that thinks it's compatible to have a religious or cultural identity with a national identity this book is going to annoy you. The premise that it's controversial for a Muslim to bulid a memorial is nonsense. If you blame 'Islam' for 9/11 then it's not to far of a stretch to blame humans for it also so perhaps memorials should only be built by Martians....
So then we have 300 pages of hand wringing and soul searching essentially over the 'problem of Islam', except it's dressed up in such wishy-washy language it grates. Waldman's insistence of presenting 'many sides of the argument' when there isn't really an argument in the book actually leads me to think this book is an insult to both Americans and Muslims - perhaps doubly so for Muslim Americans.
The key for me is that nothing actually happens of any interest in this book. The characters are amazingly one dimensional, neither evoking sympathy nor interest. After a couple of pages I got thoroughly sick of the 'Islamophobia' presented by the 'anti-memorial' camp. I got the message after a couple of pages. It seems Waldman had an interesting idea but not enough material for a book.
The 'anti-Islam' brigade - consisting of the 'victims families', ultra right wing special interest groups and shock jock media commentators have zero depth. There's a bunch of rascist polemics that go on for ever but again no real real exploration of a) why America was targeted and b) the nature of fundamentalist Islam and c) the experience of ordinary Muslims (personally I hate the term 'moderate' - you never hear of moderate Jews or Christians - I think 'moderate' equates to 'agreeing with the foreign policy of the West. Likewise, there is nothing 'radical' about the brand of Islam that seeks to drag civilization back to the medieval age).
There is plenty to criticise organised religion and how it subjugates people yet this book comfortably slips into two camps of 'you are all terrorists / let's share Ramadan'. Even portraying the winner as a non devout, drinking sexually active Muslim is a cop out. Why couldn't Mo be a devout Muslim? In the book's exploration of religion it falls at the first hurdles - the idea is 'why can't a Muslim be an American' but Waldman makes sure he's a 'palatable' Muslim
I get that there may be a lot of rascist anti-Islam feeling in America and also that the far right idiots have a voice (and also that the far right control the media and pass their ideology as common opinion on their networks). However, there is a distinct lack of ordinary American voices in this book. The families representative on the jury comes from a wealthy background - her dreamboat perfect husband (who always has a romantic purchasing solution to go along with his liberal opinions) died in the towers. She's pathetic, initially being strong in her support to 'needing answers'.
The outsider from the families representative is portrayed as an undecisive, unemployable, right wing rascist violent spouse beater. He's portrayed as a weak man, barely tolerated by his family. The rest of the families representatives fare the same - they HATE MUSLIMS. It's almost as though only the wealthy liberals have the intelligence to see past blatant rascism.
The heart strings are pulled by the Bangladeshi illegal immigrant who lost her husband in the attack. Predictably she's empowered by the debate and cuts a strong, yet sympathetic figure. The stereotypes and caracitures are exploited to the full. However, there isn't resolution to her character because in this book ordinary people don't matter - only the wealthy power brokers have any real input or voice.
Poor characters who you can't identify with. Issues explored via polemic and a completely unsatisfactory ending ('we know you're right, but America acknowledges it's hang ups, does nothing about them, but maybe learns). Waldman manages to write a book about a memorial about a terror attack that leads the reader not to care a jot or have any retrospective on those who lost their lives.
Even the premise of the book is hokum. There's a contest to design a memorial to the 9/11 attacks and submissions are anonymous from the jury. A Muslim wins....
Essentially if you're the kind of person that thinks it's compatible to have a religious or cultural identity with a national identity this book is going to annoy you. The premise that it's controversial for a Muslim to bulid a memorial is nonsense. If you blame 'Islam' for 9/11 then it's not to far of a stretch to blame humans for it also so perhaps memorials should only be built by Martians....
So then we have 300 pages of hand wringing and soul searching essentially over the 'problem of Islam', except it's dressed up in such wishy-washy language it grates. Waldman's insistence of presenting 'many sides of the argument' when there isn't really an argument in the book actually leads me to think this book is an insult to both Americans and Muslims - perhaps doubly so for Muslim Americans.
The key for me is that nothing actually happens of any interest in this book. The characters are amazingly one dimensional, neither evoking sympathy nor interest. After a couple of pages I got thoroughly sick of the 'Islamophobia' presented by the 'anti-memorial' camp. I got the message after a couple of pages. It seems Waldman had an interesting idea but not enough material for a book.
The 'anti-Islam' brigade - consisting of the 'victims families', ultra right wing special interest groups and shock jock media commentators have zero depth. There's a bunch of rascist polemics that go on for ever but again no real real exploration of a) why America was targeted and b) the nature of fundamentalist Islam and c) the experience of ordinary Muslims (personally I hate the term 'moderate' - you never hear of moderate Jews or Christians - I think 'moderate' equates to 'agreeing with the foreign policy of the West. Likewise, there is nothing 'radical' about the brand of Islam that seeks to drag civilization back to the medieval age).
There is plenty to criticise organised religion and how it subjugates people yet this book comfortably slips into two camps of 'you are all terrorists / let's share Ramadan'. Even portraying the winner as a non devout, drinking sexually active Muslim is a cop out. Why couldn't Mo be a devout Muslim? In the book's exploration of religion it falls at the first hurdles - the idea is 'why can't a Muslim be an American' but Waldman makes sure he's a 'palatable' Muslim
I get that there may be a lot of rascist anti-Islam feeling in America and also that the far right idiots have a voice (and also that the far right control the media and pass their ideology as common opinion on their networks). However, there is a distinct lack of ordinary American voices in this book. The families representative on the jury comes from a wealthy background - her dreamboat perfect husband (who always has a romantic purchasing solution to go along with his liberal opinions) died in the towers. She's pathetic, initially being strong in her support to 'needing answers'.
The outsider from the families representative is portrayed as an undecisive, unemployable, right wing rascist violent spouse beater. He's portrayed as a weak man, barely tolerated by his family. The rest of the families representatives fare the same - they HATE MUSLIMS. It's almost as though only the wealthy liberals have the intelligence to see past blatant rascism.
The heart strings are pulled by the Bangladeshi illegal immigrant who lost her husband in the attack. Predictably she's empowered by the debate and cuts a strong, yet sympathetic figure. The stereotypes and caracitures are exploited to the full. However, there isn't resolution to her character because in this book ordinary people don't matter - only the wealthy power brokers have any real input or voice.
Poor characters who you can't identify with. Issues explored via polemic and a completely unsatisfactory ending ('we know you're right, but America acknowledges it's hang ups, does nothing about them, but maybe learns). Waldman manages to write a book about a memorial about a terror attack that leads the reader not to care a jot or have any retrospective on those who lost their lives.
This has to be one of the most, interesting, exceptional, emotional, thought-provoking, moving and just down right well written books I have ever had the privilege to read.
I wavered between 3 and 4* for this one. I thought it was compelling and thought-provoking, but somehow I was left a bit unsatisfied.
Heart wrenching and thought provoking, The Submission takes place two years after 9/11. Reminding my stylistically of The Bonfire of the Vanities, the jury selects a design for a memorial from the blind competition only to discover that the architect is Muslim. The moral and ethical questions are provided in the guise of Muslims, the wealthy, the blue collars, the politicians, the television, news, and tabloid reporters, immigrants, religious and non-religious people, children, mothers, fathers, the international community, those who perished in the twin towers, worked there, and the first responders. So many great questions that still apply today in how we deal with one another, who we are as a country, and what the 9/11 legacy is - and the toll of that legacy