Reviews

The Red Queen by Philippa Gregory

whimsicalmeerkat's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Margaret Beaufort was one scary lady. Scary child too. That is largely what I took away from this book. Generally the Philippa Gregory books leave me sympathetic towards the protagonist, but not this one. Sure, were it not for her my obsession with the Tudors would not be possible. Still, scary...

3.5/5

smithrachaelynn's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

This book is about one of my least favorite people in this storyline so I just didn’t enjoy reading her story. While I felt some sympathy for her that I wouldn’t have experienced otherwise, I just didn’t love reading this.

jobustitch's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I read this book immediately after reading The White Queen and I am stuck comparing the two books and the two women, Elizabeth Woodville and Margaret Beaufort.

I liked this book slightly more than The White Queen simply because Margaret is more fascinating to me than Elizabeth. Margaret is a hard-riding bitch that has combined her hero worship of Joan of Arc with her hatred of the Yorks and has concluded that she is ordained to choose the rightful King of England (who happens to be her only child, Henry Tudor). It was fun to see her nurture each slight and turn it into another sign that she is chosen by God to do something...to be someone special. Elizabeth Woodville seems milky in comparison to Margaret.


I hope the next book in this series comes out soon and is about Elizabeth Woodville's daughter, Elizabeth of York. This book was a good time.

debbarney's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I'm all about Tudor history so, for me, this was a great read. It sheds an interesting light on Margaret Beaufort as a very obsessive, zealous and kinda crazy lady, which may have been true...or not. Phillipa Gregory does well in her storytelling but I can't vouch for her accuracy as I obviously wasn't there, but it's a great book either way.

ainaruizdegauna's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced

3.5

catbrigand's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

It was both better and worse than The White Queen. While at first I felt sorry for and rooted for Margaret, I came to dislike her as being one of the meanest and most self absorbed characters I've encountered in recent memory. While the constant references to Melusina from The White Queen were gone, instead there were so many self righteous references to God and what does or does not constitute God's will that I wanted to quit reading.

dustbunny1313's review

Go to review page

informative sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

mbenzz's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Even though the reviews of 'The White Queen' were less than stellar, I went ahead and read it anyway, and I really enjoyed it. I was looking forward to this book mainly because I've come across Margaret Beaufort in many other novels, but never had a clear picture of where exactly she came from, and what all it took for her to get her son Henry to the throne. Unfortunately, this book was a disappointment. It's not terrible, but Margaret is an incredibly unlikeable woman, which makes reading an entire novel about her seem kind of like a chore.

I knew going into this that Margaret was an EXTREMELY religious woman. Every time she's been mentioned in other novels, it's always remarked about what a pious and Godly woman she is. Well, you will certainly be reminded of it over and over and over again in this book. As well as her fascination/obsession with Joan of Arc. If you read the first book, think 'Melusina the Water Goddess'. Remember how tired you were of hearing about her? It's the same with Joan.

I never, at any point in this book felt sorry for Margaret (except maybe when she was giving birth). I'm not sure if it's how Ms. Gregory wrote her, or if she was actually like this as a person (I'm thinking it's a little of both), but for being so holier-than-thou, she sure was a nasty woman. NOTHING would please this her. Her first marriage was a very good match. Though she was still a child, she just couldn't understand that this was her lot in life. Being born into the family she was, it was her duty to marry young and have children. After being widowed a year later, her second marriage, while to a man twice her age, was a very lucky match. Henry Stafford was extremely caring and patient towards her. He gave her books to read, taught her Latin. He let her run their church on her terms and he was never 'rough' with her in physical terms, though she constantly whined about how terrible it was to married to him. She was never happy.

There were times when I actually laughed out loud, like whenever she would talk about how unfair it was that she wasn't the Queen of England. How she deserved above any other woman to be Queen. How God had chosen her for great things. I was SO pleased when someone (her 3rd husband, Thomas Stanley) finally said what I had been thinking all along, that he thinks much of it is just Margaret hearing only what she wants to, and that maybe it's her own voice telling her she's destined for greatness. Really, the whole 'Chosen by God to do great things' theme began to run thin.

Also, because Margaret spent much of her early years in the country, nothing really happens TO her, it all happens AROUND her. Battles that were won or lost, secret plans that were hatched, they all come to us in quick little blurbs since Margaret was never in the thick of things. I think one would really need to know this time period to be able to fully understand everything that's happening. Some major events are passed over in just a paragraph or two. Those unfamiliar with the times will miss quite a bit. And when Margaret finally DOES get to court, the chapter jumps 10 years, and she speaks of it in past tense, like it was nothing!

*Sigh*...I could go on, but I'll stop here. Overall, I was very disappointed with this book. Even though there were parts of 'The White Queen' that were irritating and repetitive, it had some action to it. I felt like people were doing things and stuff was happening. This, this just felt like a whiny old woman constantly complaining about why nothing ever works out for her. Why God, who supposedly chose her for great things, would ignore her for so many years. By the time she finally gets everything she felt she deserved, I just didn't care anymore.

becky_mercer93's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

linzthebookworm's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

While I liked the story I absolutely hated Margaret. I felt the entire time she was throwing a tantrum. I can't stand her holier than thou bit, or her jealousy for Queen Elizabeth. I'm much more of a fan of the White Queen.