Reviews

Condensed Chaos: An Introduction to Chaos Magic by Phil Hine

itissara's review

Go to review page

funny informative inspiring slow-paced

4.0

luotenrati's review

Go to review page

informative inspiring reflective fast-paced

4.0

A very well written and quite comprehensive introductory text to chaos magic. Compared to other texts I have read on the topic this one seems unusually well structured.

notrhiannon's review

Go to review page

funny informative

4.0

breadandmushrooms's review

Go to review page

informative reflective slow-paced

3.25

astroemi's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Excelente introducción a la magia del caos. Es claro y con muchos ejemplos y aplicaciones prácticas. Es tanto una explicación de principios generales, como un manual que puedes tener a tu disposición siempre que lo requieras.

oisin175's review

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective medium-paced

5.0

An interesting and informative approach to magic that provides a solid foundation for just about any path. Just what I had been looking for.

heathengray's review

Go to review page

challenging funny informative reflective medium-paced

3.5

This was a much clearer book in magical study than I've read in the past, but it is still, despite its many editions quite disorganized. The author choses such arbitrary chapter titles it's hard to gauge what it might be about, and consequently hard to remember what it was about.

Overall however it is a refreshing take on the many occult practices in ritual magic, and certainly a good jumping off point into aspects that may interest.

ejr1904's review

Go to review page

this made me depressed and judged 

wchorak's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

2.25

kellyofcali's review

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

1.75

I just found this...surprisingly boring for something about magic. It was certainly informative and researched, and perhaps if you are a serious magic scholar you'd be into it, but for the layperson it was too in depth and technical.