You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

puifaii's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional informative fast-paced

2.0

A mixed bag of really good points on social media and personal anti-human right, anti-transgender right agenda driving.

The premise of the book is very good, with important issue needed to be discussed, especially in an era where we are all spending most of our time on the screen, unfortunately the writers harm and the possibilities for the legitimization of pathways for the legal killing of transgender people using debunked research and excluding sources on this topic in the book extra reference material have made it believable that this part is added to drive his own agenda, not for the science.

TLDR: The book outline important issues that we really need to talk about and tackle, unfortunately, the author insert his own pseudoscience belief that might kill millions of people worldwide. It would be great if human as a society prioritize looking into this issue.

Rec: Read the book with the awareness that many of the observation are opinionated, not originating from the original studies. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mmohare's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

3.0

There was a lot of interesting data in this but a decent amount of points/arguments that were off that led to the 3 star review here. I do say I appreciate the author was willing to say he won’t be right on everything and will keep his site updated, seems very invested in the research 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

abbylechat's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective slow-paced

3.0

My eyes glazed over with all the data in the first chapter. I know, it’s ironic. I’m proving the writer’s point a bit because I can’t sit still to finish his book on how technology is ruining us. But the chapters are so long and he’s droning in about data I already know.
I had to put the ebook down and wait for the audiobook. I thought the author had some good points. It was interesting to think about how the media and Stranger Danger kind of canceled the play-based childhood. I do agree that parents should delay smartphones and social media to at least 16. I have a harder time with schools confiscating phones for the day. But then again, I was a HS freshman when the first IPhone came out. I got my first IPhone my junior year and I had the respect for my teachers and self-restraint to keep my phone in my pocket during class.


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

skyfluff's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative sad medium-paced

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

aemaltbie's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective medium-paced

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

m_a_j's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective medium-paced

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

emily_koopmann's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative inspiring reflective

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

whitne_ey's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging hopeful informative inspiring reflective slow-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jehansen127's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

himpersonal's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative fast-paced

5.0

I’m not really sure how relevant the observations and advice in this book will be in a couple of generations. I think our current younger generations (mostly whom will be unaware of the practices outlined) will figure out how to get through life in different ways out of necessity. What we know about child development will change epigenetically. So I’d be interested in testing this book against the world in about 30 years. Until then, what’s provided seems infinitely beneficial. I can already see it play out in my life a little - my older nephew learned to read and write in Korean as a toddler on YouTube, but there’s a distinct and immediately noticeable difference between him and my niece who only knew Elmo through books and only started getting screen time probably at age four or five, and it was one episode of Daniel Tiger a week and a yoga program she did with her dad. My niece is a lot more excited about new experiences and meeting new people. There are many factors that distinguish them, but I’ve kind believed their access to screen times was a big contributor.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings