Scan barcode
blackcatkai's review against another edition
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.0
no. i get that it's supposed to be a satire overall and youre not meant to like the main character, but my biggest issue was how boring the entire novel is. and technically, it's only a satire in regards to the universe of food in real life, not the sexism or murder or sex or society as a whole or whatever. so maybe if it had JUST been about that, it would've been more successful for me. then the character of Dorothy would've read better with her vapid, self important, condescending, holier than thou bullshit. but not here, not when you throw in everything else.
pacing? all over the place, mainly slow. cannibalism and violence? well, its THERE, technically? but it takes forever to get to the gruesome bits and then theyre lackluster at best. this doesnt feel feminist or inclusive or a biting commentary on anything other than narcissists suck. there's also a ton of nuanced information presented in a non-nuanced way that feels like im reading an incomplete wikipedia page with no sources and missing key context. we get it, the author learned about a lot of things and wanted us to know about them, even if some info was left out, leading to what feels like misinformation, even in a fictional story.
this is more a book about gratuitous sex, fancy food, and trips to europe because its the best (except new york city, of course) than it is about cis-female empowerment, cannibalism, or violence. its repetitive use of simile, speaking down to the reader, and infodumps, left me disengaged, bored, and desperate for the end.
basically, this book was not for me, and im so glad its finally over. thank you.
Graphic: Blood, Death, Classism, Rape, Body shaming, Fatphobia, Ableism, Racial slurs, Racism, Acephobia/Arophobia, Emotional abuse, Sexual content, Gore, Murder, and Body horror
Moderate: Sexual assault, Outing, Toxic relationship, Sexual harassment, Alcohol, Mental illness, Animal death, Animal cruelty, Infidelity, Cancer, Homophobia, Antisemitism, Drug use, Cannibalism, and Toxic friendship
Minor: Fire/Fire injury, Death of parent, Gaslighting, and Transphobia
wormgirl's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
Graphic: Cannibalism and Murder
Moderate: Toxic relationship, Toxic friendship, Gore, Violence, Mental illness, Blood, and Sexual content
perplexed's review against another edition
1.5
Also, sure, have a psycho main character but at least TRY and make them a wee bit engaging and not just a raging rude bitch
ALSO ???? bruh this book just screamed of someone being like "hey I want this word to be something better lemme just grab my thesaurus" and I h a t e that. Use big words sure, but when your sentences are filled with like 4 or 5 instances of that happening stop. Just stop. Put the thesaurus down and use words humans know.
Genuinely still don't understand how this book is feminist other than like
Also - last point I promise, how was a book about a cannibal food critic this dull??? Like that's already such a darkly comic theme ?? Please I just don't get how many 5* reviews this book gets p L e a s e
Graphic: Cancer, Death, Fire/Fire injury, Death of parent, Toxic friendship, Toxic relationship, Murder, and Cannibalism
autumngk's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.75
Graphic: Body horror, Car accident, Death, Blood, Toxic relationship, Violence, Cannibalism, Classism, Confinement, Injury/Injury detail, Emotional abuse, Gaslighting, Gore, Murder, Physical abuse, Sexual content, Stalking, Torture, and Toxic friendship
Moderate: Fire/Fire injury, Alcohol, and Forced institutionalization
elizajstocks's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Sexual content, Grief, Cannibalism, Car accident, Fire/Fire injury, Violence, Death, Cursing, Forced institutionalization, Toxic relationship, Gaslighting, Gore, Infidelity, Murder, Body horror, Blood, Injury/Injury detail, Mental illness, and Sexual violence
cjcrawfish's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Graphic: Fire/Fire injury, Injury/Injury detail, Murder, Car accident, Blood, Body horror, Cannibalism, Death, Violence, Sexual content, and Toxic relationship
apersonfromflorida's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Murder, Sexual content, Cannibalism, and Gore
Minor: Toxic relationship
ephemeral_remi's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Fire/Fire injury, Violence, Torture, Sexual content, Cannibalism, Cursing, Grief, Gore, Mental illness, Murder, Toxic friendship, and Toxic relationship
Moderate: Rape and Vomit
Minor: Animal death, Car accident, Misogyny, Alcohol, and Animal cruelty
sophafie's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Graphic: Cannibalism, Murder, Violence, and Toxic relationship
Moderate: Rape
ennui_09's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
There was another thing that got annoying after a while and that is the enumerating (?) or repetition of something but said in different ways, put in different words to emphasize what the author wants to say. I understand doing this with a few comparisons to get your point across but it happened so so so often in the first couple of pages. It stopped towards the middle.
I think this book is perfect for someone who loves food, who understands and knows what the dishes Dorothy is speaking about are. Who is familiar with cooking techniques and who has knowledge about food. Dorothy names the foods by their names, most of the time it’s in Italian and then she goes on to explain what the food is, sometimes she doesn’t but often times I found myself a little lost? I am not blaming the book for this, I think the descriptions were well done but I am not one to speak since I’ve never had those foods in my life and I don’t know how accurate it was. To me, it was nicely described although it got a lot here and there. I got a little annoyed at her for complaining so much about the food in prison, which…is my fault. Of course, a food critic and someone who’s a gourmand would complain about it so much. I think I would too if I was in her place.
I was very hooked from the start then towards the middle it kind of dragged out a little, when we got to the story about Marco I was over the description about the cattle and the whole process. I was tempted to skip those few pages but I sucked it up. I just didn’t really care about the dude’s business, not gonna lie and it dragged out. There’s also an explicit description of a cow getting killed for meat in case you’re sensitive to stuff like that. I found the part about Alex interesting, same goes with Emma. I wish we saw more of Dorothy’s friendship with Emma. It was pretty interesting.
For some murders, I found it a bit weird how she got away with it. Are the cops lacking so much to not look more into it or am I missing something? I was a little skeptical about it.
I know this review sounds like I hated this book which makes no sense since I gave it a 3-star rating BUT I liked the take on female killers, and how society sees females fit for motherhood but not able of violence. I found some quotes I really liked that got me thinking about stuff. Oh, what I liked is that at times Dorothy is speaking to the reader and calls us out. I think this happens a lot these days, I mean people got so interested in true crime and read books on it or listen to podcasts. And I felt like she was calling out people like that. I liked that part. Not gonna lie, at some parts, I was in a way rooting for her? I am not justifying what she did but I guess reading about an unhinged woman can be a little empowering.
I liked reading about her family too although dysfunctional and not the healthiest. This is all I can think about for now but if you’re someone who loves food, loves something graphic, and read about unhinged women then I think this is for you.
Maybe I would have given it more if it wasn’t for the word choice which led to me taking forever to finish this book then just made me wanna be over although it got better towards the end.
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Blood, Body horror, Cannibalism, Death, Gore, Mental illness, Murder, and Toxic relationship
Minor: Rape