Reviews tagging 'Suicide'

The Road by Cormac McCarthy

102 reviews

corruptednatz's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

3.5

This is an okay book for the dystopian genre. I never got a chance to figure out what happened to the world and what let the people to such savagery. Kinda heartbreaking the more they explore and the less they find; they slowly start to come to terms that there’s nothing left in the world. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

nikkiacat's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

e_gracereads's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

5.0

This is one of the best books that I’ve read in a while - I didn’t necessarily believe people when they told me it was good, but the last 3 pages? Incredible. This was a great book. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

soswiin's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

immediately picked this up upon hearing that it served as inspiration for the last of us (2013). writing style was weird with terrible punctuation but it grew on me. there’s no real plot to this, it’s just a bunch of bleak and dreary (albeit haunting and beautiful) descriptions. 

this book also proved my point that there is no man that can write a novel without unnecessarily talking about a woman’s breasts??

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

luis0n7i's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

zakcebulski's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0


query: how does the never to be differ from what never was?

This is a re-read, again. I read this book when I was probably around 16-17 for the first time. It served as my first exposure to Cormac McCarthy's writing style, and the specific feel of bleakness which he writes so exquisitely well.
Upon a re-read it became immediately apparent to me that I was not mature enough when I read this book for the first time to truly understand it.
Upon finishing this book on my re- read, I cam to understand that this is one of the easiest 5 star ratings which I could give.

I was absolutely enamored by the horrifically bleak shell of a world which McCarthy constructs.
This book is fairly simple- it takes place from the perspective of a man and his son who are traversing through a post-apocalyptic world via the titular road. Throughout this trek the son and the man, who are never named aside from "the man" and "the boy" must struggled to scavenge to survive. Along the way they grapple with the depleted food stores, clothing reserves, and the elements, as well as cannibalistic and murderous survivors. And, the ever so rare, but still there, "good people".
The plot, to me, is so simple but it works so perfectly- there is not really a plot aside from "survive". At earlier points in the book the man discusses his intention of "going south". We, the readers, are never told why it is that south is the way to go, and eventually, this is all dropped and the man and boy just must continue on the road.

I think that the setting of this book may be one of the most terrifying that I have read about. The constant lack of any viable sustenance caused me great anxiety when it was alerted that there was nearly no food left. This gave a good urgency to their continued desire to walk the road in hopes of their next un-promised meal.
The landscape is covered with ash, bleak, destroyed, rotting- every instance of the world feels dangerous.
When rain starts in the book, you feel a tangible level of dismay because you know the uncomfort that the characters are going to be in.
I can't help but drool over McCarthy's prose in this book. It is absolutely fucking gorgeous. If ever there was a book wherein I would recommend for how to write descriptions, it would be this book. The way that he commands the language to convey some truly abhorrent events that stick with you, he does with an ease that is incredible to try and comprehend. There are many passages within this book where I found myself rereading over and again solely because I was so caught up in his prose. I love how he struck such a balance between exposition and withholding descriptors. We never learn what the cause of the end of the world is/ was, there are clues here and there, but, McCarthy leaves that up to the reader to form in their mind.
I adored how the man is shown to by a handsy/ resourceful man solely through his actions- we are never explicitly told this. Books that treat the reader like a damn competent reader are so refreshing.  

The characters in this book are very limited for their development, though, I struggle to hold that against the book. I think, rather, that this is a stylistic choice to allow the reader to form their own images of the characters. The man, to me, represents the view of the "old world", the one who is jaded and cynical while still holding on to a hope that he ignores so that he can continue on. The boy, who knows nothing except for this world, represents the innocence wherein the man tries to shield him from this world while still trying to harbor hope or "carrying the flame".
I thought that these characters were fucking amazing. I loved how the boy was still so worried about other people- an allegorical view that suggests that people are inherently good, as the boy acts as such, even in such a horrific world. There are cannibals, there is depiction of a decapitated infant's body being roasted on a spit- this is truly stomach churning stuff. But, the man still implores on the boy to carry the flame of hope.
The man is wise to the world, but, he still acts in ways that attempt to teach the boy right and wrong. The man's grapples with his own rapidly approaching mortality are vivid and are uncomfortable, but, are well constructed as he tries to distance himself from the boy when he is dealing with fits of coughing and depreciating health. The man's wife and the boy's mother kills herself in one scene, and it is depicted as though a forgone conclusion. She kills herself with a piece of obsidian glass, but, she speaks to the husband as though he is the crazy one for choosing to continue. I thought that this argument about the ethical and moral side of suicide was interesting as it was sad to read. 

I thought that this book was absolutely fucking fantastic. It is bleak, depressing, anxiety inducing, and well paced to the point where I could have kept reading if there was no end. There are topics of discussion regarding implications surrounding nihilistic views of life, why continue to harbor hope when it is clear just surviving is hopeless,  the inherence of good and evil, and what it means to be a person. This is the type of book which sticks with you long after you have read it. I think that this book is extremely philosophical, and definitely something that though I would caution myself against recommending to everyone, if I saw someone picking this book up, I would envy their experience in reading such an amazingly crafted work. 




Expand filter menu Content Warnings

misscazz1224's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

breacommelafromage's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

childofmongreldogs's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

My first reading was definitely a more enjoyable experience. (Enjoyable in the sense that I didn't see some of the more flagrant flaws in the writing as opposed to the content matter which is mostly unenjoyable and pretty bleak.) 

There are some questions, though. While the boy's age isn't really stated, he seems to be very young in the ways in which he interacts with the world. It makes me wonder about what the world was like when he was small. He clearly understood how bleak everything was (the one question about his mother's disappearance) but he also seemed remarkably sheltered in other ways. The absence of most punctuation lacks clarity in a way that is more confusing than poignant. I will also say that it felt like none of this book was planned. Things happen, the characters react or underreact. There seems to be no direction. I don't know if it's reading into it to say that that might have been intentional since the two of them are wandering aimlessly with no plans beyond survival.

I still like The Road, however; I found that the minimalist way that it's been written really adds to the ambiance. There's a certain void to it, an empty flatness, that's reinforced by the stark punctuation and dialogue between the man and the boy. The stark contrast between the emptiness of the narrative that's pretty much void of description and the "purple prose" that seems to originate from a different perspective was an interesting choice. I actually enjoyed the characters and thought they did have a very strong personality between the two of them though I noticed some reviewers didn't see that. 

Overall, lovely prose, painful emotions, and a heartbreaking ending that leaves the reader with the same sense of mystery made it a lovely read for me. I liked that the questions remained unasked and the novel refused to answer them. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cayleigh's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

Not a feel good book by any means, but an amazingly written book nonetheless. The writing mirrored the situation impeccably, and the themes of faith, family, and survival were well executed. 

This book does not seem hopeful (at all) but actually has some inspiring takeaways. My favourite part of the book is when the man is asked what the bravest thing he has ever done is, and he replies "waking up this morning.' 

As well, this was the first book club book I've ever read, so it was definitely enhanced by the sense of community and conversation that came from it!

Expand filter menu Content Warnings