Scan barcode
millienorth's review against another edition
5.0
Absolutely inhaled this. Trite, but I would read her shopping lists (especially if they were written like the emails in this book). Already cannot wait to re-read this.
cryingalot49's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
funny
lighthearted
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
a2lulu's review against another edition
4.0
It was fascinating and innovative. I've never read anything like it and I love having a reading experience like that. There seems to be widespread dislike of it - "self-involved", "navel gazing", "first-world problems" - but to me one of the things I love about fiction is taking a trip into somebody else's life, getting inside their head and how they think. I love flawed characters who struggle and make discoveries that aren't spelled out for you. If you want a straight plot-driven narrative where the loveable heroine triumphs- yeah, this ain't for you.
iggy_pup's review against another edition
challenging
funny
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
ingeborg_frey's review against another edition
Tenkte hele tiden på middagsscenen i A Room with a View, når George Emerson former maten til et spørsmålstegn, og vipper tallerkenen så Lucy Honeychurch får se. Sjelen på bordet! Senere sier Mr. Emerson til Lucy, “By the side of the everlasting Why there is a Yes--a transitory Yes if you like, but a Yes.”
Sheila Hetis How Should a Person be er akkurat dette, et spørsmålstegn på en tallerken. Rundt bordet finner vi unge, blivende kunstnere. De sloss med sine demoner: perfeksjonisme, usikkerhet, mangel på tillit, dårlig selvbilde, frykt for å dumme seg ut, frykt for å ikke prestere, flauhet, skam. Løsningen på gåten, How Should a Person be? er ulik for alle gjestene. Men de forveksler egne behov og ønsker og utfordringer med hverandres, misforståelser oppstår, løses, fører til nye diskusjoner og konflikter, forsøk, utkast, forslag.
Sheila Heti sitt spørsmål er motivert av drømmen for å BLI noe. Hun har en personlig og innovervendt agenda, og det gjør at spørsmålstegnet hennes i stor grad formes av selvbevissthet og usikkerhet, så vel som nysgjerrighet og apetitt for livet. Hun er mindre interessert i WHY (som George Emerson) og mer interessert i HVORDAN kan jeg FREMSTÅ/BLI xxx. Men det fungerer likevel, for hun forsøker ikke å fremstille seg som hverken mer eller mindre enn det hun er. Hun prøver ikke å forkle selvpromoteringsønsket sitt i påstander om at hun er en filosofisk tenker med interesse for WHY, istedet er hun skamløst ærlig. Boka er rotete og umoden og klein, men også rørende og grådig morsom.
Sheila Hetis How Should a Person be er akkurat dette, et spørsmålstegn på en tallerken. Rundt bordet finner vi unge, blivende kunstnere. De sloss med sine demoner: perfeksjonisme, usikkerhet, mangel på tillit, dårlig selvbilde, frykt for å dumme seg ut, frykt for å ikke prestere, flauhet, skam. Løsningen på gåten, How Should a Person be? er ulik for alle gjestene. Men de forveksler egne behov og ønsker og utfordringer med hverandres, misforståelser oppstår, løses, fører til nye diskusjoner og konflikter, forsøk, utkast, forslag.
Sheila Heti sitt spørsmål er motivert av drømmen for å BLI noe. Hun har en personlig og innovervendt agenda, og det gjør at spørsmålstegnet hennes i stor grad formes av selvbevissthet og usikkerhet, så vel som nysgjerrighet og apetitt for livet. Hun er mindre interessert i WHY (som George Emerson) og mer interessert i HVORDAN kan jeg FREMSTÅ/BLI xxx. Men det fungerer likevel, for hun forsøker ikke å fremstille seg som hverken mer eller mindre enn det hun er. Hun prøver ikke å forkle selvpromoteringsønsket sitt i påstander om at hun er en filosofisk tenker med interesse for WHY, istedet er hun skamløst ærlig. Boka er rotete og umoden og klein, men også rørende og grådig morsom.
katieparrott12's review against another edition
challenging
funny
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
4.0
lizawall's review against another edition
The opening of this book is basically perfect, but can I just say... this is the first book I've managed to read in a long time not explicitly by/about queer ladies, and it is just so CHOCK FULL of cock and hetero oppression. Is this how they all are? Did I forget? It's maybe not really fair to blame the book, like she is just telling her truth, but ugh.
I actually liked the part in the beginning where she talked about how 19th c had novels and our age has blowjobs, but did not expect so many literal blowjobs. Not to yuck her yum, but I just wished she would cut it out. Of course I loved the lady friend times, the title, and, like I said, the introduction. Also parts of it kind of reminded me of a lazy [a:Iris Murdoch|7287|Iris Murdoch|https://d202m5krfqbpi5.cloudfront.net/authors/1238673382p2/7287.jpg] (including, actually, the thrall to dumb dudes), which is pretty good.
I actually liked the part in the beginning where she talked about how 19th c had novels and our age has blowjobs, but did not expect so many literal blowjobs. Not to yuck her yum, but I just wished she would cut it out. Of course I loved the lady friend times, the title, and, like I said, the introduction. Also parts of it kind of reminded me of a lazy [a:Iris Murdoch|7287|Iris Murdoch|https://d202m5krfqbpi5.cloudfront.net/authors/1238673382p2/7287.jpg] (including, actually, the thrall to dumb dudes), which is pretty good.
jessicarose1's review against another edition
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
ninabruinhof's review against another edition
challenging
funny
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
sashawhite's review against another edition
adventurous
funny
inspiring
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5