Reviews with content warning for Gore - Finders Keepers

Reviews tagging 'Gore'

Finders Keepers by Stephen King

11 reviews

eadrianschmitz's review against another edition

adventurous challenging dark mysterious sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

The King of villains strikes again. Excited to see what Ret. Det. Hodges, Jerome, and Holly are up to in the next installment and Holly's solo novel. Will Patton's narration is :chef's kiss:

**Spoilers below**

There's something slightly self-indulgent in writing about characters obsessed with a writer.
Everything about the rec center feels too lucky: That Morris finds the rec center as a haven as well, that Pete's mom still being conscious enough to notice where Pete went including that he took a key from the wall, that it was the only key missing and the key hook was labeled. Just all aligned a little too neatly.

Content Warnings

bookishchaos's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

I really liked it!! I finished the entire book in one day.

Content Warnings

amalas_bookstop's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Ummm…all I can say is wow! And I am immediately diving into the third book.

I can’t believe it has taking me this long to start reading Stephen King. After I am done with this trilogy, I am starting at the beginning.

Content Warnings

shoshpursley's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense medium-paced

3.0

Content Warnings

linda_wolf's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Content Warnings

violetturtledove's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious reflective tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Another completely gripping book. There's an unusual timeline to this, the set up is half of the book and the characters from the last book only show up at the end, but it does make for interesting reading. Like the last book you know 'whodunnit' right from the start, and can pretty much see what's going to happen, but finding out how it all plays out is the fun part.

The character of Morris is also brilliantly done, he is of course an awful person, but you still feel for him at times (waiting 36 years to be able to finish your favourite book series...ouch).

The ending also leads up really nicely to the third book, which I have of course went straight into.

Content Warnings

theimposter's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Content Warnings

zakcebulski's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

I thought that this was a really great follow-up to the already solid start to the Bill Hodges trilogy.
I had heard talk before reading this book that people felt this to be the weakest of the BHT, and, while I have not yet finished this trilogy, I quite liked this book.
The basic premise starts off with the murder of a lauded author being robbed and then murdered by a devout fan who is unhappy with the direction the author took a beloved character.
The fan, a criminal known as Morris Bellamy, is a very well read literature lover who in addition to stealing twenty thousand dollars, as well as a series of Moleskin notebooks which contain the writings of John Rothstein over the decade and a half where he was a recluse.
Morris takes his goods and hides them, but is imprisoned for 36 years for the aggravated rape of a woman.
Meanwhile, young Peter Saubers finds these treasures buried quite literally in his back yard (he and his family reside in the same house as Morris Bellamy). Peter, ever the caring child, uses portions of the money to anonymously aide his family who has been struggling due to the financial downturn. As well, Peter's father, Tom, was one of the people who was injured in the Mr. Mercedes mass killing perpetrated by Brady Hartsfield who is currently in a hospital for brain damage (Holly fucked him up).

All seems to be going as well as well can be until Morris comes knocking when he is released from prison nearly four decades after his heinous crime.
Peter tries to sell these notebooks to Andy Halliday, a rare book seller, and one time associate (and the planter of the seed that blossomed in to the Rothstein murder into Bellamy's head). Halliday tries to manipulate Peter in to selling the manuscripts to him, and this tense situation is what causes Peter's sister Tina to enlist the help of two- KERMIE Hodges and Holly Gibney who have since the events of the last book formed a PI agency known as the titular Finders Keepers.

Now, this setup, to me, is immediately interesting. I am a literature nerd as much as the next person, and you can tell that King is as well. He clearly had so much goddamn fun writing this book, and it shows. It is one of those things where someone is doing something that they are passionate about and you can feel that come through in the writing.
I feel that the "in between" books in a trilogy sometimes fall victim to the idea of "this is a bridge book I don't really care that much about it", pairing that with the fact that we are not seeing Hodges go up against Brady, and this book had the complete makings of a by the numbers romp. However, I think that King delivered a truly interesting story, and one that I am sure is going to fit well within the realm of the BHT. Will this book be the worst out of the whole trilogy, it very well may, but, in this instance I don't feel that this book is a seriously deplorable or unworthy of reading read.

I have always liked the character of a prototypically "unworthy" person being in love with learning and reading and so on- think of Stoner in John Williams' Stoner or Will Hunting in Good Will Hunting. I think that Morris Bellamy is along the same thought pattern of these characters, but, obviously he is a fucking terrible person. I really did like the portrayal of him as a moderately intelligent man who you get the feeling is committing these crimes because of his situation. But, once he does, he truly falls in to the life of a criminal. All this to say that I thought that Bellamy was an interesting character and villain, especially because he was locked up for nearly 40 years of his life, he comes out of prison with the villainous sensibilities, but, is plagued by the fact that he was stagnant for 40 years. I did not think that he was as scary as Brady Hartsfield, but, again, I don't think that he was meant to be.

I don't really like Peter Saubers, I won't lie. I found him pretty boring to read through, and every time that I was reading him, I just felt like... "Where's Jerome? Where's Bill or Holly?". I thought he was a pretty dry protagonist that seemed like he was more there solely to move the plot along, and not so much because he was a character that I cared about. I will draw the comparison to Paul Sheldon from Misery- I liked Paul because he was the protagonist, but, would not have liked him otherwise. I felt the same for Peter. He seemed very one dimensional to me.

I thought that the pacing of this book was really well done, it had a strong build up and I loved the climax of this book- it was so fucking symbolic, Bellamy being killed by the books that he had obsessed over. I thought that the irony here was impeccable, as well.
What I really appreciate is that the massacre done by Brady is used as a framing device in these books. The fact that we pick up with the victims of the massacre is a really strong illustration of how these senseless acts of violence have ripple effects that last days, months and years and years. I do think that King has a good handling of these events, and they are not played for laughs, nor are they played as aa grotesque romanticization of the horrors of these events.

Overall, I think that the hardboiled nature of this book was pretty well done. The reveal that maybe Brady was more coherent and was back to his old ways was... cool, but, seeing as the third book has come out and King publicly announced the return of Brady made this faux- ambiguous ending sort of fall flat to me.

All in all, I think that this was a very fun outing in to the Bill Hodges- sphere. I am excited to see where the rest of this story ends up. I just hope that it focuses more on Bill and Holly. I don't understand the hate for this trilogy, but, I accept and understand that everyone isn't going to like everything the same!

Content Warnings

joyride's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.75

[The Good] Finders Keepers has some of the strongest, likeable characters I've ever read in a King novel. Holly Gibney is a delightful, intelligent and resilient woman. King has mentioned he has a lot of affection for her, and it really comes through. While one big negative is his clumsy description of her as neurodivergent ("obsessive compulsive", etc), at the end of the day she is still a competent and kind nerd. And of course, as an autistic man I relate to her a lot which deepens my <3 for her. I also really liked Bill Hodges. I will always have a bit of a soft spot for the character archetype of "mild-mannered, intelligent and all around Upstanding and Good middle aged white guy". He supports and really loves Holly too, and always struck me as a kind uncle type to her. I will miss him. And can we talk about Morris Bellamy? The way he was written -initially, anyway- makes a powerful case study in the ways prison can destroy a man. He didn't need punishment, he needed help and support. Prison only makes his problems worse, and he emerges from it a painfully broken and defeated man. I found him very sympathetic. In the hands of a more competent and contemporary author, he could have been so much more than what he was in this book.

The first 2/3 of the book is also written and paced very well. The beginning is a fascinating slow burn that lays the foundation of the rest of the book. It is quite cleverly, and I enjoyed Peter's pov. The slow convergence of Morris, Hodges and Peter was also done very well, and I will admit I stayed up till 5 AM to get through that section. It was intriguing, it was fast, it was well-written.

[The Bad] Yeah, Morris Bellamy's end was shit. King seemingly ran out of ideas by the end of this novel, choosing not to explore any of Bellamy's complicated and compelling traits + motivations he himself laid out. He chose a lazy cop-out of "he's craaaazy and out for revenge!" Come on. The ending in general was disappointing, to be honest. It fizzled out rather than going out with a bang. The fact that the last scene was Peter in a photoshoot and Bill giving him some trite advice makes me scoff.

[The Ugly] King's books seem to get more bigoted the more he writes. It is nauseating how many outdated, nasty and archaic tropes he continues to use. "Predatory and fat and greedy gay man" sounds like a character he would have written in the 70s, not in fucking 2015. And it is not a passing mention, either. King seems to delight at every chance to describe in detail how disgusting and fat and gay he is. Jerome is also a bizarre character, further proof that King has never bothered to learn how to write Black people; he falls into a bizarre 'massa' voice from time to time, which is supposed to be Jerome making a joke. In what world does that make any sense..lol? The only other Black character is Bellamy's parole officer, who is also fat and sinister and taunting. Not any better.

Content Warnings

ktdakotareads's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Content Warnings

More...