Reviews

The Underdogs by Mariano Azuela

tatireads88's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark informative reflective sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

three_martini_lunch's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

soconnell104's review

Go to review page

dark emotional informative sad slow-paced

2.0

libridilevina's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

hhcharlesb's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Una excelente sobre lo que fue ser revolucionario, no sólo de ideales vive el hombre y menos cuando hay poder al alcance de la mano.

djewell14's review against another edition

Go to review page

school

moscar31's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark reflective sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes

4.0

Si bien Muñoz busca destripar la escencia de facciones concretas (el villismo, el orozquismo), Azuela, con los de abajo, parece haberse propuesto una tarea más grande: encontrar el gran mito revolucionario, con todo lo que conlleva. Así, si Demetrio Macías nos recuerda a Villa y a Zapata, si el Güero margarito nos recuerda a Fierro, si Luis Cervantes es cualquiera de los licenciados metidos en la cabeza de los grandes jefes, no es casual ni accidental. Azuela nos muestra, por medio de pequeñas escenas, la historia de la Revolución, reducida a un microcosmos de personajes arquetípicos. 

amyappy's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Perhaps knowing more about the political/social context would have interested me in this more. As it was, I was confused for most of it, and not particularly engaged in it for the rest. The translation had some fine literary moments, especially with descriptive passages at the start and finish of scenes, but I found it hard to appreciate such unlikeable characters as Demetrio and Luis Cervantes. The portrayal and treatment of women in the novel were particularly heinous, but perhaps that may have been the point. Not likely to be pulling this off the shelf to read with my kids any time soon, nor will I be reading this yearly... but that, again, may be a measure of personal taste rather than a reflection on its literary merit.

alex_renee_is_reading_away's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I could not get into the book. It read more like a script and the one consistent character I couldn't get interested in. my version had notations in the back that helped explain things or give context, but that still didn't help. For a war book, very blah.

juan_jc's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

The book is set during the Mexican Revolution. The main plot centers around Demetrio Macías, a rebel who is now leading a small team of revolutionaries across Mexico fighting the Federals (government army), the ragtag teams adventures and escapades in various towns. 



Through it you also see how Demetrio thinks about the war and about the reasons for fighting. He is shown to my lot really care about the moral or economical reasons for the war, but is rather fighting simply because there is a fight. You see him mention that he is uneducated and doesn’t care about the politics, and is just there to fight. By the end of the book, the revolution is over and different factions arise with differing ideas for the changes that should be made. When asked his opinion and vote, Demetrio refuses stating the he again couldn’t care, and simply states that if they tell him who’s side to be on, he’ll go and fight again. An interesting concept on the ideas of soldiers and war leaders. 


Expand filter menu Content Warnings