Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.12 AVERAGE
3.12 AVERAGE
I appreciate utopian fictions, however, without touching any of the politics of the book, it is mind-bogglingly boring. It could have been a better text if it had been written as a non-fiction. As it is, it just tells, via pages and pages of dialogue, rather than showing as one might expect from a fiction book.
hopeful
medium-paced
Great book, but focus on beauty was almost oppressive in my own reading.
It’s tempting to settle with one or two stars for this thinly wrought book, but I’m pretty enamored off some of the ideas behind the scant fictionalization that I’ll begrudgingly give it three stars. There’s also a wholly unnecessary amount of lechy male gaze that makes me think way less of Morris. But in this imagined world, there are critiques of the 19th century industrialism and capitalism that I appreciate.
I thought this was super interesting, it had some really progressive ideas that I liked getting a chance to dive into. I liked that in this utopia, it portrayed people still wanting to work which I think is true to human nature. A lot of arguments today center around a lack of drive to work if all needs are taken care of which just doesn’t ring true. Without work or something to break up your day, it’s easy to become sad and depressed. Humans need to strive and create, it’s human nature. I also liked the points that discussed marriage and property.
Overall I really liked seeing a world where property and wealth aren’t the driving force in society, instead mutual happiness and striving for the common good of people as a whole were the focuses.
Obviously there’s a bit of an issue with the views on gender but there’s a lot to be taken from it as a whole if you read this consciously
Overall I really liked seeing a world where property and wealth aren’t the driving force in society, instead mutual happiness and striving for the common good of people as a whole were the focuses.
Obviously there’s a bit of an issue with the views on gender but there’s a lot to be taken from it as a whole if you read this consciously
"... and if others can see it as I have seen it, then it may be called a vision rather than a dream."
News from Nowhere is a so-called 'customer journey' (ironic as that is) through the logic and ideal of Morris' decentralised socialism. Subtlety is not William Morris' strong suit. It is clear from page one that he has a vision, and he WILL enlighten the reader on the underlying reasoning of that vision through on-the-nose dialogue and observations from the point of view of the Guest. The introduction gives some context: Morris was enraged by Looking Backward - a utopia that outlined a state socialist ideal. He is determined to counter the urbanism found there with an extended appreciation (glorification?) of the rural, and a hate and minimisation of work with a love and maximisation of pleasurable work. However, he does not quite land on two feet. His claims are tenuous and unsupported, and interspersed with bland tangents about the beauty of women and nature.
EDIT 26/04/19: found a winning quote from this book in my notes:
“...whereas the nineteenth century ones were hypocrites, and pretended to be humane, and yet went on tormenting those whom they dared to treat so by shutting them up in prison, for no reason at all, except that they were what they themselves, the prison-masters, had forced them to be.”
In more detail, here are some things that got on my nerves:
Gender
It seems that a radical progression in economic organisation of society has somehow left gender liberation behind. I won't discuss the pervasive gender binary and transphobia, because this was written in the 19thC and I don't think we can quite expect Morris to be that 'woke'. But in terms of traditional female-male relations it's still a male-identified voice determining that women find it much more fulfilling to manage a household than other pursuits (though this is countered by Ellen, who is promptly put on a pedestal above all other women). Additionally, a lot of emphasis is put on women's looks as being more youthful, energetic, fertile - ("I was pretty busy watching the grand-daughter moving about as beautiful as a picture") it's easy to pick up where their value from a male-identified view lies. Is it really that much to expect someone who has the open-mindedness to hope for a communist society to also ask what role women would want to play in that society, and how they want to be valued?
A prime example of this is when he degrades "superior" women who want to emancipate themselves from the bearing of children, labelling it as yet another result of class tyranny. He claims this is no longer necessary as maternity is now 'highly honoured'. Child-bearing should be highly valued, don't get me wrong, but just because it is highly valued doesn't mean all women want to be bound by an expectation that they will bear children, and in that way, not all women want to be bound by their biology and what society determines the functional purpose of their body is. To label these women - who simply want to be valued as humans - a result of 'atmosphere of mingled prudery and prurience' created by class relations is (for want of a better word) bananas.
Transition
Hammond provides a brief outline of how we transitioned from a capitalist society to a communist one. This falls into the same trap of providing extreme detail based on real resistance and then rushingthrougheverythingthathappenedafterwardsbecausewedon'thaveafirmgrasponwhatthatwilllooklikeandwehavenowaytoensureitwon'tresultintyranny. At the most crucial moment, where utopia could become an actual distant possibility if a cogent, clear explanation of how a transition may occur was provided, Morris fails. At least he is not alone in this.
Education
It is not widespread to read books in communist England. That is a sentence that will send chills down any prolific readers' spine. A common worry in the book is that they will run out of the pleasurable work to do - yet they have not turned to literature and the expansive experiences and opportunities that provides? Morris briefly states that people who believe this are absurd - "...the ordinary daily work of the world would be done entirely by automatic machinery, the energies of the more intelligent part of mankind would be set free to follow the higher forms of the arts, as well as science and the study of history. It was strange, was it not, that they should thus ignore that aspiration after complete equality which we now recognise as the bond of all happy human society?"
He does not offer any explanation as to why automatic machinary can not free all people to do the labour and learning they wish to, in an equal manner. I'm not sure why equality and automation are necessarily mutually exclusive.
Obviously, it will also set off alarm bells for any political thinker - uneducated masses who can't criticise their reality is a breeding-ground for tyranny and exploitation. Though they seem to have avoided that so far.
Though this paints a critical view of News from Nowhere, there were a few ideas that I enjoyed. Direct quotes say it all.
Criticism of education
"... of times past, when "the struggle for life," as men used to phrase it (i.e.,the struggle for a slave's rations on one side, and for a bouncing share of the slaveholders' privilege on the other), pinched "education" for most people into a niggardly dole of not very accurate information; something to be swallowed by the beginner in the art of living whether he liked it or not, and was hungry for it or not: and which had been chewed and digested over and over again by people who didn't care about it in order to serve it out to other people who didn't care about it."
"... you expected to see children thrust into schools when they had reached an age conventionally supposed to be the due age, whatever their varying faculties and dispositions might be, and when there, with like disregard to facts to be subjected to a certain conventional course of "learning"... such a proceeding means ignoring the fact of growth, bodily and mental. No one could come out of such a mill uninjured; and those only would avoid being crushed by it who would have the spirit of rebellion strong in them."
On Oxford - "My old kinsman says that they treated them in a very simple way, and instead of teaching poor men's sons to know something, they taught rich men's sons to know nothing... it was a place for the "aristocracy" to get rid of the company of their male children for a great part of the year."
Complacency of the masses
"Well, these men, though conscious of this feeling, had no faith in it, as a means of bringing about the change. Nor was that wonderful: for looking around them they saw the huge mass of the oppressed classes too much burdened with the misery of their lives, and too much overwhelmed by the selfishness of misery, to be able to form a conception of any escape from it except by the ordinary way prescribed by the system of slavery under which they lived; which was nothing more than a remote chance of climbing out of the oppressed into the oppressing class."
Pleasure and Art in Work
"...many of the things which used to be produced - slave-wares for the poor and mere wealth-wasting wares for the rich - ceased to be made. That remedy was, in short, the production of what used to be called art, but which has no name amongst us now, because it has become a necessary part of the labour of every man who produces."
A home I want
"...while nearer to us, in fact not half a furlong from the water, was a quite modern stone house - a wide quadrangle of one story, the buildings that made it being quite low. There was no garden between it and the river, nothing but a row of pear-trees still quite young and slender; and though there did not seem to be much ornament about it, it had a sort of natural elegance, like that of the trees themselves."
True wealth
He characterises those in this society as those "who had cast away riches and attained to wealth."
"... while you live you will see all around you people engaged in making others live lives which are not their own, while they themselves care nothing for their own real lives - men who hate life though they fear death."
Nature
On a final note, over the past while I have nurtured a growing appreciation for nature. This book offered a picturesque, calming escape from my everyday when I am not often out of view from a building or road. I want that little stone house, blended into the landscape.
News from Nowhere is a so-called 'customer journey' (ironic as that is) through the logic and ideal of Morris' decentralised socialism. Subtlety is not William Morris' strong suit. It is clear from page one that he has a vision, and he WILL enlighten the reader on the underlying reasoning of that vision through on-the-nose dialogue and observations from the point of view of the Guest. The introduction gives some context: Morris was enraged by Looking Backward - a utopia that outlined a state socialist ideal. He is determined to counter the urbanism found there with an extended appreciation (glorification?) of the rural, and a hate and minimisation of work with a love and maximisation of pleasurable work. However, he does not quite land on two feet. His claims are tenuous and unsupported, and interspersed with bland tangents about the beauty of women and nature.
EDIT 26/04/19: found a winning quote from this book in my notes:
“...whereas the nineteenth century ones were hypocrites, and pretended to be humane, and yet went on tormenting those whom they dared to treat so by shutting them up in prison, for no reason at all, except that they were what they themselves, the prison-masters, had forced them to be.”
In more detail, here are some things that got on my nerves:
Gender
It seems that a radical progression in economic organisation of society has somehow left gender liberation behind. I won't discuss the pervasive gender binary and transphobia, because this was written in the 19thC and I don't think we can quite expect Morris to be that 'woke'. But in terms of traditional female-male relations it's still a male-identified voice determining that women find it much more fulfilling to manage a household than other pursuits (though this is countered by Ellen, who is promptly put on a pedestal above all other women). Additionally, a lot of emphasis is put on women's looks as being more youthful, energetic, fertile - ("I was pretty busy watching the grand-daughter moving about as beautiful as a picture") it's easy to pick up where their value from a male-identified view lies. Is it really that much to expect someone who has the open-mindedness to hope for a communist society to also ask what role women would want to play in that society, and how they want to be valued?
A prime example of this is when he degrades "superior" women who want to emancipate themselves from the bearing of children, labelling it as yet another result of class tyranny. He claims this is no longer necessary as maternity is now 'highly honoured'. Child-bearing should be highly valued, don't get me wrong, but just because it is highly valued doesn't mean all women want to be bound by an expectation that they will bear children, and in that way, not all women want to be bound by their biology and what society determines the functional purpose of their body is. To label these women - who simply want to be valued as humans - a result of 'atmosphere of mingled prudery and prurience' created by class relations is (for want of a better word) bananas.
Transition
Hammond provides a brief outline of how we transitioned from a capitalist society to a communist one. This falls into the same trap of providing extreme detail based on real resistance and then rushingthrougheverythingthathappenedafterwardsbecausewedon'thaveafirmgrasponwhatthatwilllooklikeandwehavenowaytoensureitwon'tresultintyranny. At the most crucial moment, where utopia could become an actual distant possibility if a cogent, clear explanation of how a transition may occur was provided, Morris fails. At least he is not alone in this.
Education
It is not widespread to read books in communist England. That is a sentence that will send chills down any prolific readers' spine. A common worry in the book is that they will run out of the pleasurable work to do - yet they have not turned to literature and the expansive experiences and opportunities that provides? Morris briefly states that people who believe this are absurd - "...the ordinary daily work of the world would be done entirely by automatic machinery, the energies of the more intelligent part of mankind would be set free to follow the higher forms of the arts, as well as science and the study of history. It was strange, was it not, that they should thus ignore that aspiration after complete equality which we now recognise as the bond of all happy human society?"
He does not offer any explanation as to why automatic machinary can not free all people to do the labour and learning they wish to, in an equal manner. I'm not sure why equality and automation are necessarily mutually exclusive.
Obviously, it will also set off alarm bells for any political thinker - uneducated masses who can't criticise their reality is a breeding-ground for tyranny and exploitation. Though they seem to have avoided that so far.
Though this paints a critical view of News from Nowhere, there were a few ideas that I enjoyed. Direct quotes say it all.
Criticism of education
"... of times past, when "the struggle for life," as men used to phrase it (i.e.,the struggle for a slave's rations on one side, and for a bouncing share of the slaveholders' privilege on the other), pinched "education" for most people into a niggardly dole of not very accurate information; something to be swallowed by the beginner in the art of living whether he liked it or not, and was hungry for it or not: and which had been chewed and digested over and over again by people who didn't care about it in order to serve it out to other people who didn't care about it."
"... you expected to see children thrust into schools when they had reached an age conventionally supposed to be the due age, whatever their varying faculties and dispositions might be, and when there, with like disregard to facts to be subjected to a certain conventional course of "learning"... such a proceeding means ignoring the fact of growth, bodily and mental. No one could come out of such a mill uninjured; and those only would avoid being crushed by it who would have the spirit of rebellion strong in them."
On Oxford - "My old kinsman says that they treated them in a very simple way, and instead of teaching poor men's sons to know something, they taught rich men's sons to know nothing... it was a place for the "aristocracy" to get rid of the company of their male children for a great part of the year."
Complacency of the masses
"Well, these men, though conscious of this feeling, had no faith in it, as a means of bringing about the change. Nor was that wonderful: for looking around them they saw the huge mass of the oppressed classes too much burdened with the misery of their lives, and too much overwhelmed by the selfishness of misery, to be able to form a conception of any escape from it except by the ordinary way prescribed by the system of slavery under which they lived; which was nothing more than a remote chance of climbing out of the oppressed into the oppressing class."
Pleasure and Art in Work
"...many of the things which used to be produced - slave-wares for the poor and mere wealth-wasting wares for the rich - ceased to be made. That remedy was, in short, the production of what used to be called art, but which has no name amongst us now, because it has become a necessary part of the labour of every man who produces."
A home I want
"...while nearer to us, in fact not half a furlong from the water, was a quite modern stone house - a wide quadrangle of one story, the buildings that made it being quite low. There was no garden between it and the river, nothing but a row of pear-trees still quite young and slender; and though there did not seem to be much ornament about it, it had a sort of natural elegance, like that of the trees themselves."
True wealth
He characterises those in this society as those "who had cast away riches and attained to wealth."
"... while you live you will see all around you people engaged in making others live lives which are not their own, while they themselves care nothing for their own real lives - men who hate life though they fear death."
Nature
On a final note, over the past while I have nurtured a growing appreciation for nature. This book offered a picturesque, calming escape from my everyday when I am not often out of view from a building or road. I want that little stone house, blended into the landscape.
adventurous
hopeful
mysterious
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
And I thought Looking Backward by Edward Bellamy was a bland, didactic socialist utopia! At least Bellamy's arguments were well thought out and seemed at least plausible. Morris's communist utopia is full of half-baked ideas told in the most pedantic manner possible.
In Morris's world, everyone is happy just doing what they want to do, with no explanation as to why anyone would choose to do backbreaking menial tasks, and where mowing wheat is seen as a light, recreational activity.
It’s a world where education and books are shunned, history is happily ignored, and technological advances are actively discouraged. Money and government are nonexistent. Incredibly, communism leads to longer lifetimes and the elimination of ugly people (not to mention that women seem to blush a lot!) and, seemingly, people of color.
As opposed to Bellamy, Morris accurately predicts that a change to communism would not be without civil war, but naively predicts that everyone would miraculously realize the errors of their "master-slave" relationship and willingly lay down their arms for the greater good.
With its rambling lectures masquerading as dialog, reading this book took real fortitude. (I read the 1892 edition.)
In Morris's world, everyone is happy just doing what they want to do, with no explanation as to why anyone would choose to do backbreaking menial tasks, and where mowing wheat is seen as a light, recreational activity.
It’s a world where education and books are shunned, history is happily ignored, and technological advances are actively discouraged. Money and government are nonexistent. Incredibly, communism leads to longer lifetimes and the elimination of ugly people (not to mention that women seem to blush a lot!) and, seemingly, people of color.
As opposed to Bellamy, Morris accurately predicts that a change to communism would not be without civil war, but naively predicts that everyone would miraculously realize the errors of their "master-slave" relationship and willingly lay down their arms for the greater good.
With its rambling lectures masquerading as dialog, reading this book took real fortitude. (I read the 1892 edition.)
slow-paced
Delightfully idyllic, and obviously practically barmy