Scan barcode
bookomens's review against another edition
5.0
Such an enjoyable read!!!!! I especially love the last 60% of the book despite some detail historical traits, which I also appreciate but expect more of the technical aspect in the development of the quantum theories.
This reminds me so much of how much I love and adore non fiction physics with historical academia where the darkest thing is the creation of atomic bomb. The realistic and voice in such books made me distanced myself from dark academia but it is hard to contemplate such extreme when you got used to a more realistic historical view.
This reminds me so much of how much I love and adore non fiction physics with historical academia where the darkest thing is the creation of atomic bomb. The realistic and voice in such books made me distanced myself from dark academia but it is hard to contemplate such extreme when you got used to a more realistic historical view.
adamrshields's review against another edition
4.0
Short review: This is really the story of a classic paradigm shift in science. (Shift from Newtonian to Quantum Physics) It is more history than science writing. I learned some of the concepts of physics but it is sort of like watching a documentary about Citizen Kane. You find out why something was new and important, even if you don't really fully understand the whole picture.
Part of what is interesting is that the last hour of audio is a post script talking about where science has gone since Einstein and Bohr. The whole fundamental nature of our understanding of reality has changed in the last 110 years. It is easy to forget how much what we know (as a society, not we as individual people) that was considered heresy 100 years ago.
It is also interesting to really look at how specific and focused science has become. I had friends that were married while I was in grad school in University of Chicago. He was working on a PhD in Physics and she a PhD in bio-chemistry. They said they had a hard time even reading one another's papers let along understanding them.
Longer review is on my blog at http://bookwi.se/quantum-einstein-bohr-and-the-great-debate-about-the-nature-of-reality-by-manjit-kumar/
Part of what is interesting is that the last hour of audio is a post script talking about where science has gone since Einstein and Bohr. The whole fundamental nature of our understanding of reality has changed in the last 110 years. It is easy to forget how much what we know (as a society, not we as individual people) that was considered heresy 100 years ago.
It is also interesting to really look at how specific and focused science has become. I had friends that were married while I was in grad school in University of Chicago. He was working on a PhD in Physics and she a PhD in bio-chemistry. They said they had a hard time even reading one another's papers let along understanding them.
Longer review is on my blog at http://bookwi.se/quantum-einstein-bohr-and-the-great-debate-about-the-nature-of-reality-by-manjit-kumar/
weltenkreuzer's review against another edition
5.0
Sehr umfangreiche aber gut lesbare Geschichte der Kopenhagener Deutung der Quantentheorie und der damit verbundenen Debatte zwischen Niels Bohr und Albert Einstein. Auch die Physik wird anspruchsvoll aber gerade noch verständlich erklärt.
generalheff's review against another edition
3.0
This book is discussion of the development of quantum mechanics from Planck’s awkward introduction of quantisation to solve the black-body problem, through the notorious Einstein-Bohr debates on the interpretation of quantum mechanics in the 20s-50s, to Bell’s theorem and its experimental validation that proves how quantum mechanics is incompatible with theories that require “local realism” (i.e. with some or all aspects of our intuitive take on how the world is).
I found this book very difficult to score: on the one hand it has re-ignited my interest in quantum mechanics and all its mad consequences and counter-intuitive statements. On the other, I found that where my interest was most piqued, the book drew up short and just didn’t give me everything I wanted in terms of the nitty gritty of the physics, leaving me feeling like I wasn’t quite getting the full picture.
For a bit of background, I’m a lapsed physicist (I did a degree in mathematical physics but it’s been a long time since I’ve used it). This is the first pop-science book I’ve read since before my degree - and I absolutely loved coming at the subject not from a technical, quantitative point of view (as then), but from a conceptual and historical angle. I feel like I’ve developed a better conceptual take on quantum mechanics than during my whole degree (illustrative of the technicians education I got in all manner of horrifically challenging maths without enough emphasis on experiment and background to what we were doing).
The downside, I think, of my background is that, though undoubtedly helping me understand the book better, I also craved more detail in places than the book offered. More worryingly, I felt the book glossed over complex, important issues too briefly - perhaps bespeaking the authors journalism background. As a concrete example, the rebuke Bohr gave to Einstein’s light-box experiment is anything but sound - and only my own knowledge and intuition for the subject revealed that to me. That, in turn, led me down a rabbit hole of reading about Einstein’s though experiments - which has been fun - but I feel I should’ve got that out of the book I just read and not outside reading.
Paradoxically, I’ve ended up concluding that this is both too basic and too complex. The range of topics covered is huge and, though well written, I feel would be really challenging for the un-initiated. For me (as the initiated) by contrast, I feel there wasn’t enough detail - leaving me feeling a bit unsatisfied and searching around for more comprehensive (but still historical / conceptual) books on the subject.
In short good, but ultimately a little unsure of its audience and the worse off for it.
I found this book very difficult to score: on the one hand it has re-ignited my interest in quantum mechanics and all its mad consequences and counter-intuitive statements. On the other, I found that where my interest was most piqued, the book drew up short and just didn’t give me everything I wanted in terms of the nitty gritty of the physics, leaving me feeling like I wasn’t quite getting the full picture.
For a bit of background, I’m a lapsed physicist (I did a degree in mathematical physics but it’s been a long time since I’ve used it). This is the first pop-science book I’ve read since before my degree - and I absolutely loved coming at the subject not from a technical, quantitative point of view (as then), but from a conceptual and historical angle. I feel like I’ve developed a better conceptual take on quantum mechanics than during my whole degree (illustrative of the technicians education I got in all manner of horrifically challenging maths without enough emphasis on experiment and background to what we were doing).
The downside, I think, of my background is that, though undoubtedly helping me understand the book better, I also craved more detail in places than the book offered. More worryingly, I felt the book glossed over complex, important issues too briefly - perhaps bespeaking the authors journalism background. As a concrete example, the rebuke Bohr gave to Einstein’s light-box experiment is anything but sound - and only my own knowledge and intuition for the subject revealed that to me. That, in turn, led me down a rabbit hole of reading about Einstein’s though experiments - which has been fun - but I feel I should’ve got that out of the book I just read and not outside reading.
Paradoxically, I’ve ended up concluding that this is both too basic and too complex. The range of topics covered is huge and, though well written, I feel would be really challenging for the un-initiated. For me (as the initiated) by contrast, I feel there wasn’t enough detail - leaving me feeling a bit unsatisfied and searching around for more comprehensive (but still historical / conceptual) books on the subject.
In short good, but ultimately a little unsure of its audience and the worse off for it.
voicelesswhisper1107's review against another edition
challenging
informative
inspiring
mysterious
reflective
tense
slow-paced
5.0
forlorncorn's review against another edition
5.0
This guy blows my mind. It's hard to be true to his teachings because the brain is a hardwired mess but I love that the possibilities exist, and I hope some day I can say I know for sure.
bookomens's review against another edition
5.0
Such an enjoyable read!!!!! I especially love the last 60% of the book despite some detail historical traits, which I also appreciate but expect more of the technical aspect in the development of the quantum theories.
This reminds me so much of how much I love and adore non fiction physics with historical academia where the darkest thing is the creation of atomic bomb. The realistic and voice in such books made me distanced myself from dark academia but it is hard to contemplate such extreme when you got used to a more realistic historical view.
This reminds me so much of how much I love and adore non fiction physics with historical academia where the darkest thing is the creation of atomic bomb. The realistic and voice in such books made me distanced myself from dark academia but it is hard to contemplate such extreme when you got used to a more realistic historical view.
paulgrostad's review against another edition
4.0
Parts of this book went above my head, but at the same time it's a well written book that provides a very good description of the important developments in Quantum theory.