Reviews tagging 'Sexual harassment'

Das Haus - House Of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski

15 reviews

challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
dark emotional mysterious tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

More of an activity book than a novel. It's like a David Lynch film in the sense that there are parts I like, parts I don't like, but my overall enjoyment was elevated by it being something quite unlike anything else I'd seen before. I've just started exploring the community around the book now that I've finished and there are some really interesting interpretations and takeaways.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

I don't even know where to start with House of Leaves. I'm gonna try to do a surface level review before diving into spoilers and my thoughts on the content.

I think two terms really, really help to describe the general feel of this book: "Esoteric" and "Unreliable Narrator." This book, in its content, format, pacing, multiple authors and editors and footnotes and citations,  can be deeply, deeply confusing. I think I could read this book 5 times and still come out of the other side with questions. If you are interested in trying to decipher a book that really does feel like it started as a critical review of a piece of media and ended as a culmination of multiple people's blurred spirals into madness, this is for you. But know that at least for me, diving into that challenge meant that I loved some parts of this book, and other parts felt painfully slow and agonizing to read through. I also think this is the longest book I've ever read, and some parts of the book really do read like a critical and highly technical article, which was interesting to experience coming out of college with experience reading similarly challenging papers.

**SPOILERS BELOW**

The parts of the book that were really hard for me where any point where Zampanó had uninterrupted writing in the body or footnotes of House of Leaves, especially without containing primary interpretation of The Navidson Record. I became enthralled in the stories of Will Navidson, or in Truant's stories of his time with Lude, but then both of those would be lost to what felt like a very long section pertaining to the mythology of Echo, or the labyrinth and minotaur, or Karen's infidelity and people's opinions on it, or why photojournalism is undervalued to film. Perhaps it is because I am a very slow reader that these sections felt like they took my immersion away from the story of The Navidson Record. As I looked for sections of the book that felt long to add to this review, each of the sections I mentioned actually appear quite short. It may have been a good idea to just skip past readings that I felt were grueling, as Truant suggested to on page 31.   

I also was hoping that there would be a bigger overarching conclusion to the story - maybe something written by Ed, to tie in Appendix III and update us on what happened to Truant and Navidson (I feel like I remember reading Navidson didn't survive? What happened to Zampanó to lead to his death? What is The Last Interview? Why was the word "House" blue? Why is Yggdrasil at the end of the book? Honestly, I feel I read somewhere that Navidson didn't make it out of the house, but the closest match I can find now to where my thought that Navidson had died was from Page 7, where it is referenced that Navidson is like a spectre and hasn't been reached since The Navidson Record was released. But perhaps those unanswered questions are just part of the appeal of this book - to leave the reader in such confusion that it sparks a journey to understand the book, its mysteries, and uncover the truth behind the book. A journey similar to what Navidson takes for his own house. A quote I really like that I feel partly rings true for readers of the book can be found on p. 527:

"Passion has little to do with euphoria and everything to do with patience. It is not about feeling good. It is about endurance. Like patience, passion comes from the same Latin root: pati. It does not mean to flow with exuberance. It means to suffer."

I may try to uncover some more mysteries about this book. I have a lot of questions left unanswered, and after skimming back through, re-reading the introduction or Ch. I-IV may help to resolve some of those questions. I remember seeing strange dots in Ch. VIII, and strange symbols in Ch. IX. But maybe Truant's first words are all I need to wrap the story up on my own:

"This is not for you."

I really did enjoy reading through this book though. Formatting, content, and narrator-wise, it attempts some incredibly novel things. Reading about a character through a dead man's writing, which is edited by someone spiraling into madness and re-edited by another team, is really cool. I wish it played with the use of the appendices more - there are a lot of collages and images that I didn't feel I explored - but overall this is a really cool book. I can see some inspiration for things like MyHouse.wad and the backrooms that may have come from this. I wish it felt easier to read through the book, but it's possible it is my own inexperience with reading that led to my lack of immersion. I am still very glad I finished it. I'll be thinking about this book for awhile.

Favorite quotes:
Tom gets by, Navidson succeeds. Tom just wants to be, Navidson must become. And yet despite such obvious differences, anyone who looks past Tom's wide grin and considers his eyes will find surprisingly deep pools of sorrow. Which is how we know they are brothers, because like Tom, Navidson's eyes share the same water. (p. 32)

People frequently comment on the emptiness in one night stands, but emptiness here has always been just another word for darkness. Blind encounters writing sonnets no one can ever read. Desire and pain communicated in the vague language of sex. (p. 265)

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging mysterious slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Almost DNF'ed. The beginning is painfully slow. So much of the text is completely unnecessary. Interesting concept and story. When things happened, I was interested. But everything was so dragged out it was hard to get through.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

This is one of my favorite books, you find something new every time you read it. If you're going to read this for the first time, I suggest keeping a notepad or sticky notes nearby because there are things you'll want to revisit.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark mysterious sad slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark emotional mysterious sad tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

So many thoughts, so little energy. Maybe I'll return here at some point.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious sad tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

This book is very important. Reading it, at times, is very much a challenge. I had fun with it, despite taking me nearly 5 months to read. Take into advice the first line of House of Leaves: This is not for you, but the novel is also very interesting, so you might want to read it. Be prepared to flip your book upside down, and to be interrupted in the middle of a description of abyssal hallways leading on for infinity with a (NSFW)
very explicit scene where a main character gets a finger up his butt and cums from it
. Great & wild book, will never read again /pos.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious sad tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

Expand filter menu Content Warnings