You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Scan barcode
starsbyname's review against another edition
5.0
Graphic: Sexual content
nelumie's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Maybe because I read the previous book in the series, but this all felt super familiar.
I guessed who “Shmac” was immediately. I had picked the person who was spoiling the project too. Romcoms aren’t known for being thrilling mysteries that keep you guessing to the last second. But as the reader, I did find myself annoyed at the MC for not seeing it all from the get go – though it’s explained why she doesn’t.
I’m considering buying this book after having borrowed it from my local library, and have put a lot more Ali Hazelwood books on hold.
Graphic: Gun violence and Sexual content
Moderate: Death of parent
Minor: Panic attacks/disorders, Suicide, Violence, Sexual harassment, and Classism
whatisbeereading's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Cursing, Sexual content, Gaslighting, and Abandonment
Moderate: Death, Misogyny, Sexism, Toxic relationship, Medical content, Grief, Death of parent, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Gun violence
samlauren07's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.5
- 1.5🌶️
- I love the continuation of women in stem throughout this series. That being said this book was almost too science plot heavy for a romance. It took me out of the story a few times.
- I loved the quirkiness of the characters but I needed more character development from the main M character. He seemed like a watered down version of book 1s main M.
- It was a good book. Not bad not great.
- It was funny at times but had a lot of “cringe” moments and the entire plot is based of miscommunication.
- The depth just wasn’t there like with other books the author has.
Moderate: Sexual content
carla20's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Misogyny
britishbelle's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Sexual content
kybeaty's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Death of parent
Minor: Emotional abuse, Infidelity, Sexism, Toxic relationship, Violence, and Toxic friendship
kayteaface's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.25
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Gun violence and Toxic relationship
Minor: Stalking, Car accident, and Death of parent
jessicabearbooks's review against another edition
4.0
Graphic: Sexual content
esalmon13's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
1.5
Graphic: Sexual content