Scan barcode
have_a_doris_day's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Death, Grief, Medical content, Toxic friendship, and Confinement
Moderate: Infertility
Minor: Homophobia
itsheyfay's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
Graphic: Bullying, Toxic friendship, and Confinement
Moderate: Death, Cursing, Injury/Injury detail, Medical content, and Sexual content
wellfedpages's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
How do you know you are real?
What makes someone human?
What is humanity?
Consciousness?
Soul?
If you can raise animals to slaughter, why not humans?
If not to slaughter, to use in other ways
Where is the line?
Dystopias just take reality one step further
A step we are heading towards
Perhaps a step we have already half taken
Like here
But what has that got to do with Tommy?
Well other than exploring the above dilemmas, it also shows how an unreliable narrator leads to a tinted truth
SPOILERS
We only see things through Kathy's eyes
Tommy is the good guy, even though he seeks constant validation
Ruth is the villain, because she does not care about his ego
But is that the truth?
Ruth does many careless & hurtful things
But Kathy is mean to Ruth too
So is Tommy and he hurts Ruth in his own way
But we never hear from Ruth
Or Tommy for that matter
Kathy is clearly in love with Tommy and feels Ruth came between them
Ruth admits this eventually, tries to undo the harm
But Tommy says nothing
Nobody forces someone to be with another person
Even if Ruth did come between them, why did Tommy choose to be with her? Twice
Because she is more attractive?
Or because he felt something for her?
Why does Tommy only choose Kathy after Ruth is almost dying?
And even then why are certain things amiss in their relationship?
Are they simply beaten down by life?
Or is he not attracted to her in the same way?
Does he still feel something for Ruth?
Is it guilt?
Does he choose Kathy because there is no future with Ruth?
Is Kathy his ticket to a few more years?
Does he like Kathy more because she validates him?
Or does he just like the validation and not Kathy at all?
Does he hate Ruth because she does not validate him?
Or does he hate himself because he doesn't know what he wants?
Is he just a selfish piece of shit, or is it more complicated than that?
Isn't he really the person who came between Kathy and Ruth?
Is Ruth a better person because she ultimately chooses her friend?
Or is it too little too late?
The mess that they make of their lives is what makes them human
Kazuo Ishiguro simply raises the questions
The answers are all ours
But perhaps women in real life rarely do that, and Ishiguro simply shows us the mirror
Minor: Toxic friendship and Toxic relationship
lindseyhall44's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
4.75
Never Let Me Go follows Kath as past relationships are rekindled, leading her to remember the significant events of Halisham, her old school. Through these memories Kath begins to learn more about the dark truths hidden throughout adolescence, but also truths about herself.
For me, the writing style and formatting are what made the book so unique. Told in 2nd person and non-linearly, readers are only given surface level information until the resolution. Ultimately, this helps cultivate a mysterious mood and makes the payoff more worthwhile.
Still, some elements of the confusion made it difficult for me to follow, which is why I rated it 4.75. The ending was phenomenal and quite a tearjerker, but in a few cases I wasn’t as invested as I would have liked to be.
No shame on the author however, as writing a book is incredible on its own, especially one creative as Never Let Me Go
If you like gradual sad books with character driven elements, this is for you:)
Graphic: Terminal illness, Infertility, Confinement, Medical trauma, Death, Forced institutionalization, Medical content, and Toxic friendship
Moderate: Ableism and Sexual content
ghostly_monstera's review against another edition
3.25
I have a lot of thoughts about this book that it almost makes it impossible to put them into any kind of order.
I suppose this whole thing will be spoilers because it is hard to talk about this book without it.
The fact that every student at Hailsham is a clone feels like a weird thing to leave out until a random page in part two. I really thought there would be a big lead up to the breaking of that news, but it came rather casually in the middle. I found it rather annoying because it made all the confusion up to that point kind of unnecessary.
And honestly, the writing was slow and a little dull. I can't deny that Ishiguro brings an ethical conversation to the table in a way that is true to how things are discussed (or avoided) in our own world. I still was rather annoyed that there was no true resolution or answers, but again, that is probably the point he was trying to make. Big ethical issues, despite the overwhelming circumstances, don't ever have true resolutions especially when things are already in motion (like the donation program in this case).
An aside: I had to read this for a class. We spent four weeks discussing this book, picking it to the bone concerning ethics but not really caring about the story aspect of it.
It is not a bad book. It brings to attention some questions we should be asking ourselves while also allowing us a look into complacency in culture when our own individual needs are met. It is an interesting study for those reasons, but as a novel, I don't know that I would have picked it up if my grade wasn't dependent on it.
Moderate: Death, Forced institutionalization, Infertility, Medical content, and Toxic friendship
ekcd_'s review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Graphic: Medical trauma, Toxic friendship, and Toxic relationship
Moderate: Drug use, Cancer, and Death
Minor: Body horror
greatu's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
4.0
Graphic: Toxic friendship, Abandonment, Bullying, Confinement, Death, Forced institutionalization, Grief, Medical content, Sexual content, and Terminal illness
lizzyrai's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Graphic: Death
Moderate: Bullying and Infertility
Minor: Toxic friendship
glitchkitsch's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Moderate: Bullying, Gaslighting, Infertility, Toxic friendship, Toxic relationship, and Classism
Minor: Forced institutionalization, Grief, Homophobia, Infidelity, Medical content, Medical trauma, and Sexual content
The type of forced institutionalization is not what one would consider typical but it's difficult to explain what that content warning means without spoiling the whole thing so just tread cautiously.tarynlannister's review against another edition
I also just found it rather bleak, so when I started getting bored I decided I would rather read something that was either more entertaining or at least less depressing.
Moderate: Sexual content, Death, Medical content, Terminal illness, and Toxic friendship
Minor: Bullying and Body horror