Reviews tagging 'Panic attacks/disorders'

Three Women by Lisa Taddeo

20 reviews

sauvageloup's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative reflective sad medium-paced

3.5

Rating this book for how much I liked it, versus how well I thought it achieved its purpose, feel like totally different things.

Pros:
- Taddeo definitely has a pretty way with words. Sometimes it hit exactly right and was very astute and/or moving. She weaves the stories together really well and collected all the threads into one big carpet of 'desire in women' which I know from trying to bring fiction plots together AND bringing university essays into a neat but inpactful conclusion is really hard.
- it was definitely thought-provoking. When i couldn't sleep because of my cold, I thought about this book and the women in it, trying to puzzle them out at the same time as my reaction to it, and how it related to my life, my gender. 
- I liked very much that Taddeo acknowledged that Black and poor (and other maginalised) women have it much harder. The book wants women to go after their desires without being limited by society, or men, or other women, or shame, or the law. But it does admit this is far easier for some than others, and the women it focuses on in the book are all (to my knowledge) white.
- Some of the parts on desire did ring true to me. Women shamed for wanting sex, or wanting part but not all of it, of the word 'slut' hanging in the air even when it's not said, of being terrified of sex but desperate to abate the loneliness at the same time. Somewhere in there, it did hit a chord at times.

Cons:
- Primarily, I found it hard to relate? or objectively view? this book because of my own feeling around woman-ness. I'm non-binary, I've deliberately rejected being called a 'woman' in whichever places I feel comfortable enough to come out. But in society at large and my own home with my parents, I'm still considered, against my will, to be a woman. I feel so strongly about not being a woman that I've gone out of my way and caused myself pain trying to figure this truth out inside me, and yet I was brought up as one, are viewed as one 90% of the time, and have the body parts of one. So that alone makes any book trying to "cut to the heart" of being a woman very difficult.
- That said, I didn't feel like i could relate to much of what the women were feeling or doing, either in what I'd observed in women around me or in the feminine parts of myself. How much of that is down to my own denial, me not being a woman, me not being observant or experienced or cynical enough, or even me being British not American, I don't know. I had a visceral rejection to many things in each of the women's story's that just said 'that doesn't feel True'. Not the events, of course, I don't doubt the trauma and the awfulness the women went through, but how they reacted to men and the cruelty between women didn't feel true to me. I haven't met women so consumed by men, or women being so cruel. Maybe I'm naive. (but then there's all the reviewers saying that the book 'gets to the heart of who we are' and i'm just like ????
- I also felt that the book was trying to be brand new and yet didn't feel that original at all. It said here, look at these women's pain and feel shocked and angry on their behalf. I've read other books that talk brutally about rape and abuse (Notes to self by Emilie Pine and Escape by Carolyn Jessop) in real life as well as the struggles of parents who didn't do right, who didn't protect their daughters. I suppose the fact that Maggie wasn't believed in her rape trial shows that these stories need to be out there, but I feel it's preaching to the choir sometimes. But I don't know how much is me trying to be like, I'm different, I wouldn't act like that, I would believe the women and support them and be happy for their successes and I know the world is complicated and wouldn't judge them for having an affair, or being too brash, and goddammit i'd say something if someone got an eating disorder. But there's always the doubt of, would I actually?
- Sometimes the flowery writing was just A Bit Much, and sometimes it was painfully blunt. Both of which I could more used to as the book went on, but it felt like unnecessary excess at times, in crudity and in flowery-ness. (But I think maybe Taddeo was aiming for that - to try to capture something bigger than the literal, and to be brutally honest. So here's where what i like and can manage to read splits away from reviewing whether or not Taddeo wrote a good book.)
- There was also the problem of the assumption that to be a woman you must experience sexual desire. That they all do. That it's normal. Impying that it's not normal if you don't. If you're asexual for example. I don't know, perhaps I'm expecting too much. I know this focuses on three allosexual women who like men, but when a book is claiming to be trying to include the whole of female desire, i felt it could have at least touched on women who don't want sex, or on women who have a penis. (also the implication that men are wrong if they don't want sex?? Lina's damp-fish of a husband, who's described as 'smirking' after the therapist validifies his desire not to want to kiss. Like, he *is* valid. He's just wrong for Lina, as she's wrong for him.)
- Finally, I feel uneasily like Taddeo might be the type to be a terf. I can't find anything that suggests so, but the literal one mention of queer people in her book (a gay man) is followed immediately by him acting badly. There's no discussion of gender beyond the binary, and Sloane's experiences as a queer woman seem primarily to be at her husband's bequest and not hers. Taddeo talks about women's desire, but never about women's desire for other women.

So yeah. Complicated.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

devyanisingh_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad slow-paced

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jooreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad tense medium-paced

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

asbat's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective medium-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bluebellwoods's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective fast-paced

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

devikapha's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark sad slow-paced

2.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cmvoelkel's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional medium-paced

2.75

I picked up this book years ago but put it down very soon after because I just couldn't get into it. This time I started it as an audiobook whilst waiting for other holds to come in and was immediately captivated by the writing and narration. I fully appreciate writers who can write non-fiction in such a lyrical and engrossing way that it reads like a novel.  Taddeo's writing really hooked me.  That said, nothing else did.  
As someone with a degree in sociology/psychology, I have a real interest in observational and ethnographical research.  This here however, just felt more like voyerism than ethnography and unnecessarily so.  I kept waiting for the big reveal or tie-in at the end, the greater reflections on female desire that the author would use to make sense of or draw value from these (white women's) stories.  There wasn't any.  I am left wondering what the point of this book was and feeling a bit miffed that such great writing went to such a salacious, shallow and short-sighted cause.  

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

onion's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional sad slow-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

darkmattersoybean's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional informative slow-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

writtenontheflyleaves's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective sad medium-paced

4.75

 Three Women by Lisa Taddeo đź«€
🌟🌟🌟🌟✨
-
This was one of my last reads of 2020 and it ended the reading year on a high!
-
🗣 The concept: Lisa Taddeo weaves together the stories of three real women, whose lives she believes reveal something buried and true about women’s desires. The research here is unbelievably deep, and it gives the book the quality of a novel as you read it - it feels hyper-real almost, as Taddeo takes you inside the minds of these women in a way you don’t expect from non fiction. Lina, who is having an affair; Maggie, who was seduced by her teacher as a teen, and Sloane, who has sex with other men while her husband watches.
-
Here’s the thing about this book: I thought it was a masterpiece. I have my reservations about some of it - for instance, Taddeo seems fundamentally sceptical of supportive relationships between women, and in general any book that purports to reveal truths about Women’s Desires I take with a grain of salt. Still, overall it was beautiful and complex and viscerally real.
-
However. I would also never recommend this book to anyone unless I knew them very well - the nature of the stories here, in combination with the writing style, could make this a really disturbing read.
-
❤️ Read it if you like creative nonfiction and stories that render teenage girlhood in a way that makes you ache inside. Maggie’s story in particular really tugged at me.
-
đźš« Avoid it if you’re looking for something light or optimistic, and if you’re avoiding stories that deal with rape, eating disorders, adult/minor relationships, and suicidal thoughts. Honestly if you’re avoiding any particular trigger I’d research this book before reading - @the.storygraph has a content warnings section so start there! 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...