Reviews

Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism by Vladimir Lenin, Vladimir Lenin

maozetinna's review

Go to review page

5.0

Somewhat lengthy with many charts and tables. While the truths about capitalism have remained the same/intensified since the writing of this book, the examples used are all outdated. Using this book along with modern examples of capitalist imperialism would greatly increase the significance of this work.

metalgeartofu's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective slow-paced

4.25

ponythief's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

4.0

cill_e's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative slow-paced

4.0

earthgrinder's review

Go to review page

challenging informative medium-paced

3.75

aisclaradm's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative inspiring fast-paced

5.0

Brilliant book; I was expecting to have to slog through it but it was easy to read, clear in intent and information, and was extremely interesting.

xanderman001's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I don't think Kautsky's political career is going to recover from this one.

rodri931's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

5.0

arnenaess's review

Go to review page

4.0

how enlightening! i knew most of this but it’s nice to have it laid out so plainly.

alanffm's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Lenin's "Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism" is a short text which argues that imperialism is the inevitable outcome of advanced capitalistic enterprises. The main villains in this endeavor are the banks, whose tendrils stretch across the world and whose interests are not tied to nations or peoples. Lenin's citations are generally on point, and the examples he uses to show how a given capitalist enterprise will always be encouraged to strive towards monopoly and eventually imperialism are strong.
Unfortunately, Lenin misses a major point which undermines his text: imperialism is not just the product of capitalism, but a natural problem associated with any endeavor that requires creative production or output. Lenin's Marxism is frustrating and his constant need to use capitalism as a crutch - that is to say as a go-to excuse for the world's problems - blinds him to the real cause of imperialism and monopoly. Capitalism is a catalyst that optimizes the economy. Lenin assumes that optimization naturally favors monopoly, but that is, as far as my reading of the text is concerned, an assumption and not a fact.