Reviews

The Defiant Agents by Andre Norton

anflaw's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced

3.25

isabellarobinson7's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.5

Rating: 2.5 stars

This was weird. It was just... odd. I won't really go into plot specifics here, because while it wasn't all that memorable to begin with, the things that made The Defiant Agents weird are the same things that affected the plot.

The time difference between books two and three makes no sense for them to have achieved all this stuff. Timeline-wise, The Defiant Agents starts 18 months after Galactic Derelict (I googled it) and yet, they have made these gigantic strides in technology that would normally take years to establish. They found this alien ship in the previous book, and in less than two years, have managed to not only understand it at a fundamental level, but have somehow developed such an advanced comprehension of what was not long ago literal alien technology that they can build a fleet of said ships. A civilisation that was leagues ahead of humanity in every way, and I'm supposed to believe we cut open a few ships, looked at a few control panels, and now we are standing alongside them? Sorry, but that's nowhere near plausible in my eyes.

The second thing is this "science" of reverting individuals back to the people their ancestors were. Aside from the question of why anyone would find a group of de-evolved humans useful (they wanted a couple of ooga-boogas around, idk), I also am confused as to how they would know what ancestors to choose. I was born in Aotearoa/New Zealand, but my people are not from here, i.e. I am not Māori. In a similar vein, I also have a decent amount of Australian blood, but I have no ethnic connection to any of its indigenous peoples. I have mostly German and English blood. So do I revert back to an Anglo-Saxon? Or maybe a member of one of the Germanic tribes, like the Goths? If that is the case, I am so disconnected from those parts of the world, that what's the point of doing it in the first place? Maybe I'm just not a good example, so I wouldn't be an ideal test subject, a fact I am more than happy to live with.

While I loved book one of this series, my enjoyment of each subsequent book has dropped gradually. I am still going to continue with The Time Traders series and hope this was simply a brief dip in quality and Norton will return to form. Plus, I bought all the audios and have all the ebooks, so it's not like I can go back now.

tarana's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

My sisters were huge fans of Andre Norton as teenagers. I didn't read any Andre Norton until the last year or two. For me, it's been hit or miss. This one was a miss. This one was really hard to get my attention - the story was just too weird, IMHO. Maybe if I had read book 2, I would have had a different result (wasn't available in audiobook). I really loved Time Traders book 1, so I was disappointed that this didn't keep my interest.

serena_dawn's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Andre Norton took Travis Fox and ran away with him to another planet, all on his own; when he had been one of three characters, he wasn't very noticeable - but in this setting, all on his own, he clearly stands out and shines. I quite liked the mysteries here, and all the little things that added up to the finish.

krknights's review

Go to review page

3.0

I used to devour Andre Norton books when I was a kid. I think this was one of them, but it's been so long I can't exactly remember (although, looking at the cover, I'm pretty sure I did read this one). In any case, it was a fun read--more so than I'd expected, in fact. Not exactly high literature, and there was a lot of hand-waving, plot-wise, but a quick, entertaining way to spend an evening or two.

bzedan's review

Go to review page

4.0

Apache v. Tartar! In space! And there are Reds, and coyotes! And some time travel, though mostly mental, oh my goodness Norton how I adore you.
More...