Reviews

Yellow: Stories by Don Lee

raccoonfoo's review

Go to review page

emotional funny informative inspiring reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

4.0

dude_watchin_with_the_brontes's review

Go to review page

4.0

I loved the stories, and liked the way the different stories intertwined.

I felt like some of the characters were a little too similar - confusing narcissistic women and the men who love them. Maybe that's why I liked "The Lone Night Cantina" so much - told from the point of view of an interesting woman, and possibly the only story that passed the Bechdel Test.

nledge's review

Go to review page

3.0

3.5

leahrdswan's review

Go to review page

Thought it was kind of boring 

nathansnook's review

Go to review page

2.0

"๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜บ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ ๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ฉ๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ฑ๐˜ถ๐˜ป๐˜ป๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ข๐˜ง๐˜ง๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ด ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ฌ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข ๐˜ฉ๐˜ถ๐˜ง๐˜ง, ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฃ๐˜บ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ด ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฌ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ'๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ข ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ด ๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ง๐˜ง๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ'๐˜ฅ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ. ๐˜ˆ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜บ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜จ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฃ๐˜บ, ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ฌ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฎ, ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ต, ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ข๐˜ง๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฎ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜ข ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜ถ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜บ, ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜บ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ค, ๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ, ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฆ."

It's amazing to me that the first story was even a Pushcart winner. How Don Lee got to publish a collection of mediocrity astounds me. With stories that are flat and half-fleshed out, they are ultimately drafts that require a lot more work than it took for him to even get to teaching at a grad/undergrad university level.

Take a look at this quote for example, cluttered with so many adjectives: puzzling, mysterious, peevishly, pointed. All of these instances where the adjectives stand could've been expanded, but, unfortunately, create a muddy run-on that lessens the impact of the punch at the end of the sentence. Lee doesn't care for economics, no, with a story that runs for 20 or so pages, with shallow dialogue that gives no flesh nor blood to the characters.

Initially, I picked this up because Elaine Hsieh Chou had mentioned it in an interview about her novel, ๐˜‹๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ. I think this was a good reference in seeing Asian-on-Asian antagonism and conflict for character-development research, but, it just goes to show that bad writing follows bad writing. 

Either there are no editors left in the world. Or writers aren't doing their job. 

*DNF

diamondolc's review

Go to review page

3.0

Decently good short story collection that was interesting but not mind-blowing. I found the writing to be lyrical and pleasant, but the characters to be a bit bland/repetitive. I found myself confusing some of them with each other. I also didn't really like the inconsistency in that some of the stories intertwined but others didn't. I think it would have been better if either all of them were connected or none of them were. Also, a lot of the stories would build up to something exciting happening and then skip over it entirely straight to the aftermath, which kinda felt like a cop-out to me. Like, "eh, this scene is gonna be difficult to write, so how about I just skip it?"
I dunno. Worth a read, anyway. I liked it overall.

not_mike's review

Go to review page

4.0

Yellow is an excellent read.

juniperb23's review

Go to review page

4.0

Moving stories of the Asian American experience

yumikat2006's review

Go to review page

5.0

a good primer into fiction about the lives of East Asian cishet men and women. i actually really liked it.

lan_string's review

Go to review page

3.25

I wanted to like this so much more than I did. I loved the interconnectedness of the stories; I loved the complexity of the town and of the families. I thought the concepts were great; most of the plots were really gripping. It fell flat for me on a few fronts. Firstly, for a collection that is ostensibly about representation and creating narrative space for Asian Americans, I felt like the text was surprisingly pandering to other audiences. This might be the fault of an editor trying to make the collection more palatable, but likeโ€ฆ.. if I need to look up ABC because Iโ€™m not the target audience, then I think weโ€™re all going to live, you donโ€™t have to spell it out for me. The main problem I had though was that often, the stories were just a little shoddily written. Apart from a few really great and thought-provoking one-liners, the entire thing just felt rushed. There was a lot of potential supported by not very much good execution. It felt SO obvious that the rest of the stories were thrown together to support a collection inspired by Yellow. And on that note, wow - making your titular, closing, and by far longest story the absolute best of the bunch?? Total shocker. It was good though. :-) also loved the cowboy story with Annie Yung.