Scan barcode
laurajeangrace's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Murder, Injury/Injury detail, Gun violence, Colonisation, War, Vomit, Violence, Racism, Xenophobia, Death, and Confinement
Moderate: Medical content, Sexual assault, and Rape
alyanna_dm's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
Graphic: Violence and Blood
Moderate: War
Minor: Rape
lbelow's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Racial slurs, Violence, Torture, Racism, Hate crime, Colonisation, Terminal illness, Death, and Blood
Moderate: Child abuse, Ableism, and Emotional abuse
Minor: Kidnapping, Sexual assault, and Sexual harassment
loreofthebooks's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Military fantasy can be hit or miss for me. I'm very picky about it most of the time, however, I felt that The Unbroken did it very well. This book showed a complicated look at colonialism, and unlike a lot of other books, I felt it was done very well. It was woven in with the story in a way that made it work. There was a definite depth to this book, and it wasn't one of the typical rebellion books that you read.
First off, there were lots of grey areas, and Touraine (who is the best) was part of that. Her character arc was delightful in this book. Because at first, you know who is in the wrong (or at least you think you do), and then there are more complicated aspects to it as well.
Luca wasn't a pleasant character, but I get why Clark gave her a viewpoint, because it was showing multiple sides to the story -- to what each side was thinking. Essentially, this book was rebellions within rebellions. It was convoluted, and I loved that aspect of it.
Clark also included some political intrigue, which is more of what I love. I liked that I didn't know who to trust, and how the interactions between characters were complicated. All the characters themselves were complicated.
The magic in this book was curious, and I like how we were exposed to it -- and its mystery was doled out in small pieces.
I thought overall the writing was good, however, there were a few things that I struggled with in this book.
The slowness in some parts. I felt that parts were more drawn out than necessary, and that it didn't help the story any. Also, just the pacing overall just didn't quite work for me.
I wasn't totally sold on the relationship between Tour/Luca, and I get what it is supposed to be, but it didn't work as well as I wanted it to. I could see where it was going, and what Clark was aiming for, I just personally didn't think it felt as fleshed out as it could be. I felt there was very little interaction for Tour to switch her affections so quickly, and I just wasn't as in love with that aspect of the book.
Overall, this was a strong military fantasy that I enjoyed.
Graphic: Violence, Death, and Colonisation
Moderate: Torture
Minor: Rape
bisexualwentworth's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
The Unbroken is a military fantasy set in a fantasy version of North Africa (the former Shālan Empire) that has been colonized by fantasy France (Balladaire). It follows two point-of-view characters: Touraine, a Qazāli-born conscript of the imperial army, and Luca, the crown princess of Balladaire, and their complicated relationship with each other, both as individuals and as stand-ins and representatives for their nations and cultures.
I haven't read another fantasy novel that explores internalized oppression, empire, and white saviorism in quite the gorgeous and intertwined way that C. L. Clark does in The Unbroken.
When we first meet Luca, she is a princess and a scholar, passionate about doing right by her people—so that she can take the throne that is rightfully hers from her uncle the Duke Regent. As a scholar, she has theoretical knowledge of the horrors of empire. She expresses interest in and respect for Shālan culture in a way that no other Balladairan-born character does. These aspects of Luca endear her to the reader—and draw Touraine to her as the two women grow closer. And then she loses herself to the same colonizing impulses that she thought herself better than earlier in the novel.
When we first meet Touraine, all she cares about is the wellbeing of her fellow conscripts. They are her family, and she will do whatever necessary—even on behalf of the empire that took everything from them—to protect that family and do what she thinks is best for them. Unlike Luca, Touraine is fully grounded in the realities of her situation—and then her world shifts and expands. She makes mistakes. She fucks things up. And she is complex and heartbreaking and BRILLIANT. Touraine's growth over the course of this book stunned me. It made me feel so many things so deeply. Her entire mindset changes, gradually and painfully, over the course of the novel, without changing what makes up her essential self.
The worldbuilding is delicious. C. L. Clark obviously draws all of the aesthetics and language of both Qazāl and Balladaire from the real world, but she also incorporates trade, religion, political theory, and even disease in ways that make the world feel unique and fresh and lived in.
I don't want to talk about the plot too much because I think that readers should discover its twists on their own, but I cannot wait to discuss their book at greater length with more spoilers at some point.
My one real critique of this book is that I didn't feel like I understood the magic well enough for the heavy lifting it does in the climax and resolution of the book to be totally satisfying.
Additionally, if you are looking for romance, this is the wrong book for you. To be clear, it is VERY sapphic. And if you enjoy hot women with swords, you are absolutely going to eat this shit up. But I would not call the extremely fraught entanglement between the two main characters romantic. It is far more complicated than that, and I feel like boiling down Touraine and Luca's dynamic to the sexual or romantic desire of it would be an insult both to Touraine's character and to the overall goals of the novel. There is not a romance between the leads in this book, nor should there be.
There IS a sapphic side couple in this book that will likely break your heart, though.
Oh, and HOLY MOMMY ISSUES OH MY GOD.
Favorite quotes:
- "Maybe she had been a dog all this time, but she was ready to fight back."
- "It was easy to be a villain when she felt like on inside."
- "A smattering of applause. Less than she'd hoped for, more than she had any right to expect."
It likely goes without saying that this book handles its diversity brilliantly. The world is queernormative and seemingly lacking in any sort of gender roles, but it has all of the other violences and bigotries and evils of our own world. Luca is physically disabled, and the book handles her disability beautifully.
C. L. Clark is the sort of writer I want to be. I can't wait to read The Faithless.
Graphic: Gun violence, Death, Violence, Colonisation, War, Slavery, Murder, Racism, Blood, Gore, and Torture
Moderate: Xenophobia, Religious bigotry, Racial slurs, Child abuse, Sexual harassment, Kidnapping, Sexual assault, Rape, Grief, and Terminal illness
This is a very heavy book overall. One of the very first scenes is a hanging. Be prepared for that sort of thing throughout, and if that sounds like too much, it is likely not the book for you.risaleel's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Colonisation, Racism, Religious bigotry, Trafficking, War, Death, Police brutality, Xenophobia, and Violence
Moderate: Classism, Death of parent, Addiction, Blood, Confinement, and Physical abuse
Minor: Alcohol, Gore, Vomit, Sexual assault, Sexual harassment, and Animal death
skienight's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Graphic: Violence, War, Vomit, and Xenophobia
Moderate: Terminal illness, Injury/Injury detail, and Sexual assault
btrz7's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Child death, Colonisation, Child abuse, Death, Violence, War, Ableism, Blood, Xenophobia, Genocide, Hate crime, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Sexual assault and Rape
sarakas's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Racism, Injury/Injury detail, Death, Violence, and Gore
Moderate: Colonisation, Sexual violence, Injury/Injury detail, Sexual assault, and Rape
sarakas's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Graphic: Death, Racism, and Violence
Moderate: Gore, Sexual assault, and Sexual violence