leannanecdote's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

notsogabbygabby's review

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

satashii's review

Go to review page

informative slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

I have more than a few issues with this book and I’m struggling to understand a lot of the glowing reviews.  For one, the first person narrative felt like the story was all tell and very little show.  There was a lot of exposition via stilted conversations that were not very believable and (quite honestly) I went back and forth between finding things tawdry and immature from a writing standpoint.  For a book labeled historical fiction I was pretty sure I was reading a young adult novel that was ticking off boxes of things modern best sellers must have. 

I was not impressed—hence the star rating.   Belle does not undergo much character growth and still comes off as a Mary Sue to the very end.  

The main character, Belle, is a real person but the historical accuracy suffers from the choice of first person narrative.  A quick search on her name told me a lot more about her than this book did and I don’t think the book really did her story any favors.  There is more than enough primary source material to have written a much better and fuller story.  The book itself is overlong, the climax happens at about the 70-75% mark and then we spend another sixty pages on stuff that really didn’t feel necessary.  A more focused book on one element of Belle’s life would have been more appropriate for the word count.   I’ve never read anything else by these authors but after this I’m not really inclined to. 

While I was sympathetic and interested in the viewpoint of a white-passing black woman who became a femminist icon of the suffragettes… this story really didn’t go into hardly any details about that.  it’s a side show to the story of Belle having cringily written romantic attachments to much older men.  It’s vaguely mentioned that she pretends to be younger than she is at the very beginning by six years but I wasn’t sure if she continued this ruse in addition to her other ones.  Add in the trauma she undergoes and… then what?  There’s so many things stuffed in by telling the reader about them that they don’t have very much emotional impact. 

Mostly, this book just made me frustrated and tired.  There’s a better story to be told here than the one I just read.  I would not have finished the book if my bookclub hadn’t chosen it as our monthly read. 

So one star for teaching me things about Belle’s father and another star for making me very curious about Anne Morgan and her friends.  It sounds like they were all very remarkable woman and I suspect Belle was as well…. I just didn’t like this version of her very much. 

I think I need another palette cleanser book to read after this one.  



Expand filter menu Content Warnings

katharina90's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated

3.0

This book is based on so much conjecture and creative embellishment, and factual timelines/events were changed (according to the authors) for the sake of storytelling, that I don't feel like I have a solid understanding of Belle Da Costa Greene's life after reading this. In hindsight I would have preferred a biography over this fictionalized version of events. 

I particularly dislike the glorification of JP Morgan and other members of the upper class, especially their portrayal as saviors who "preserve" art by locking it up in their private collections. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

karyan1's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

meganpbennett's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful informative inspiring reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

I don't read a lot of historical fiction, and I don't normally enjoy fictional books written about real people. This goes double when a large portion of the historical "facts" are presented through conjecture and inductive/deductive reasoning. Or when something important in the real person's real life is changed because it works better for the story. 

This book has all of those things, following the fictionalized life of Belle de Costa Greene, the librarian for J. P. Morgan's library. Only, Belle de Costa Greene.... was a black woman, passing for white in a world where being caught meant death. Not much is known about her, though Morgan's life is rather well documented. My hometown library did a "one book, one community" read with this book, and I thought it would be a good opportunity to read a book I would not have otherwise picked up to read. It was a very interesting read, though I found it to be rather on the slow side. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

susannah_knox's review

Go to review page

emotional informative reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

I appreciated getting to know the real person behind the novel and this was an interesting, fun read... but I was not in love with the writing style.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

chloemakesbooks's review

Go to review page

inspiring medium-paced
Pros: good work "aging" the character, interesting premise, some good characterization, book p0rn
Cons: dragged out ending, anti-climactic, suffers from historical fiction's cardinal sin, name-dropping, barely passed the Duvernay test 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

girlpuck's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional inspiring medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

remie's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional informative inspiring tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings