Reviews

The Dragon Masters by Jack Vance

psoglav's review

Go to review page

3.0

My rating: ★★★

a0ri's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark reflective tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

Enjoyable, especially for it's length. The battle sequences can be a little hard to follow at times, but they are broken up enough that it feels like you get a break

eyesofheaven's review

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

beefmaster's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Have you seen that tweet that goes "there's more flavour in one single Cool Ranch Dorito than a medieval peasant would know in their entire lifetime?" Couldn't stop thinking about that tweet as I read this. There's more cool science fiction shit in 137 pages than 24 hours of Marvel movies. Imagine if a Marvel movie fan who thinks Endgame was the best thing ever read even the first 40 pages of this novella? He shit his pants from the sheer breadth of imagination.

cwebb's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Weird. In a good way. It is kinda short, and still feels slow sometimes, but those were the days back then...

metaphorosis's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Despite being one of Vance's more celebrated stories, a re-read didn't really change my view. I'd say it's a 3.5 rather than a 3, but I round down because it could have been better.

Vance starts with an interesting idea
Spoiler- that two antagonistic races breed their prisoners of war into specialized soldiers -
and introduces it in an understated way. But the result lacks the usual Vance narrative charm, and emotionally, the story doesn't go very far. It feels more like a sketch than a full story. It's a shame, because as a novel, I think it could have achieved it's promise.

Certainly worth reading, but if I had to choose a story for which Vance should have won a Hugo, this wouldn't be it.

CVIE V

dsell's review

Go to review page

adventurous fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

5.0

vaderbird's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

5 star - Perfect
4 star - i would recommend
3 star - good
2 star - struggled to complete
1 star - could not finish

leticiatoraci's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I've read a portuguese edition with only the first novel of this book. This book's premise is very interesting, but the reason I give it only 3 stars it's because I felt it was poorly developed, suffocating the idea's great potential. Instead of a better world and background description the reader is given one battle scene after another. It was too much action. Too little exploration of everything the story's alien and human worl and the different alien and human species, which by the way sounded almost the same, would have to offer. Still worth a read though, even if to incite the reader's mind of what the story could have been if completely fleshed out.

par3's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

2 Stars. It was just barely okay. I didn’t care for the characters or story line much at all. The most interesting part was probably the sacerdotes. Hard to believe it won a Hugo Award.