Reviews with content warning for Transphobia - Frankissstein

Reviews tagging 'Transphobia'

Frankissstein by Jeanette Winterson

104 reviews

booksonmars's review

funny mysterious reflective fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

A little bizarre but I liked the discussions on human existence and the slight humour jabs. I would've given it a higher rating if I understood more of the plot, particularly some of the other POVs.

Content Warnings

angel_kiiss's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark informative mysterious reflective tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.75

I’ve never read any other book by Winterson, but - based off this book - I’d say she’s more a philosopher or robotic sociologist than she is a storyteller.

There’s a stark difference between the stories she’s comfortable telling and the story she obviously is leaving her comfort zone to explore. Ry Shelley is an incredibly complex character who Winterson is ill-equipped to handle and does horrifically wrong at almost any given opportunity (that’s where the major content warnings come in).

The gender exploration of a person who lives outside the binary while simultaneously finding comfort in an identity on the binary is compelling and relevant and real, but Winterson obviously hasn’t met anyone who actually lives like this otherwise she’d be aware of what not to do when writing a trans character.

It’s disappointing, because the story is actually beautifully written but is horrifically marred by the events that surround the trans character. Winterson’s stances on many political debates are also written in the most clunky way imaginable: “You must be one of those #MeToo women.” As if it were necessary to not only show the reader but tell us every characters politics.

I may also claim that the prose are very nice, but it needs to be acknowledged that the entire book looks like a first draft. Dialogue is not in quotations and characters with accents have their accents written out only for the reader to stumble over the words. You get used to it more as you read but it’s weirdly not used as a narrative device since it’s used throughout in both past and present storylines.

Content Warnings

amy2113's review

Go to review page

reflective medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

Content Warnings

julietejames's review

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

Content Warnings

alexilse's review

Go to review page

dark tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

0.5

I almost never say this, but don't read this book. Frankenstein is one a favorite of mine so I was intrigued when I saw this semi-reimagining. And that aspect of the story is good - the realized conversations Mary Shelley has with Percy and the depictions of her life at that time was really captivating, whereas the "contemporary" portions of the book are actually so harmful. The protagonist is a Trans character and yet the writing, whether intentionally done so or not, is extremely transphobic. Content warning: There's also a graphic scene of sexual assault and violence that is completely unnecessary. Despite the positive reviews and the fact that it was long-listed for a prestigious award, this book further proves the necessity to diversify those doing the reviewing and nominating because it should not have been as lauded as it was.

Content Warnings

bookedbymadeline's review

Go to review page

Confusing how there aren’t any quotes around the dialogue

Problematic: Ry compliments a Black woman’s hair by saying she looks like an expert “maybe because of how you style it. Very professional.” As I’ve seen from other reviewers the book does not get any better in Trans rep for Ry. I have no interest in reading about a Trans character that is written for cis people like myself and would rather spend my time on books with more accurate representation.

The conversation around AI-prof stein says that AI won’t make women obsolete or be sexist which begs the question of how could it not be sexist when the ones building the robots are sexist themselves? It’s human error. He’s being idealistic in thinking that a future of AI will be non binary when the creators of AI have their own prejudices and beliefs that will be built into AI, just like humans writing the Bible put their own image on God.

Where is the story even set in?! First they talk about Memphis then they’re going to a bar in Trafalgar Square?

Content Warnings

sophiewelsh's review

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes

1.5

Content Warnings

ohitsbetterthisway's review

Go to review page

I was not enjoying it. The way trans-ness is portrayed often made me sick to my stomach.

Content Warnings

drhilbert's review

Go to review page

medium-paced

Strong character development? No

1.0

would've been nice if it wasn't for the transphobia

Content Warnings

tjthetd23's review

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Frankkissstein is a modern version of what James Joyce wanted Ulysses to be. The writing style is unique but it isn't nonsensical; it draws you in. The story is chock full of triggers but it never feels gratuitous with its violent or abusive content. Everything that happens does so for a reason and enriches the characters even when it is awful. Winterson blurs the line between fiction and nonfiction beautifully in a way that often had me googling whether the scenes, particularly the ones of Mary Shelley later in life, were fact or fiction. To understand characters that are based on real people so thoroughly that you can fictionalise parts of their narrative and not have it feel out of place is an amazing skill in a writer.

Content Warnings

More...