Reviews

Anne Perry and the Murder of the Century by Peter Graham

angus_mckeogh's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Not terrible but not amazing either. The whole thing was a bit cut and dry with a healthy half of the book amounting to speculation about why the crime occurred. Not a whole lot of mystery.

badseedgirl's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

How am I ever going to finish this treacly series knowing it was written by a stone cold, unrepentant killer?

https://www.goodreads.com/series/332456-christmas

Seriously, Anne Perry is an unrepentant killer and I can't support that, not even at Christmas.

mrsbear's review against another edition

Go to review page

I started and put down this book so many times I lost count. I am sad to say this is one of the very few true crime books that I just could not get into even after numerous tries.

larry_yonce's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

fascinating details
Riveting account of a shocking murder committed by 2 teenage girls. Strikes a good balance of back story, the crime, the trial, and the aftermath. Several theories for the girls' behavior have been advanced thru the years and are presented. An epilogue outlining what became of some of the people surrounding the investigation and the trial is a welcome addition. Well done!

mkaybaker07's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Interesting story, the writing was dense and repetitive at times.

sparrowlight's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Fascinating account but would have loved less tedious background information. As others have noted, the Audible narration leaves much to be desired. It's not the worst I've ever heard but a better reader would have helped.

jmrhike's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional tense medium-paced

3.25

beastreader's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I am a little familiar with Anne Perry. I have never read any of her books. In regards to the murder she helped commit, I never read up on it or watched the movie based on the events, Heavenly Creatures. So you ask then why did I want to read this book? It is because I am not familiar with Juliet Hulme otherwise known as Anne Perry that I wanted to read this book. As well as the fact that I do enjoy reading about true crime stories.

While I do appreciate Mr. Graham spending so much time explaining about Anne and Pauline and their families, what I really wanted to read about was the story. Not to say that Anne and Pauline’s childhoods were not part of the story as I do believe it is as it helps to tell sometimes why people do the things that they do.

I do have to agree with another reader who commented on the fact that Mr. Graham went as far as to explain details about what the people were wearing while attending the trial. This is not of great importance to the story. With all this detail it did feel stiff reading this book. There was not so much body and life to the story but just a lot of details. If you took away some of the details then this book would have been shorter at about 100 pages.

vikingwolf's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I've been fascinated by this murder case ever since I saw Peter Jackson's film 'Heavenly Creatures' and I managed to dig up three books about it-eventually! This was by far the standout book and it goes into detail about the girls meeting, their home life, the fantasy world they create together, the murder and the aftermath, right up to what happened to all the main players.

The book opens with the day of the murder with really shocking details of the injuries suffered by Honorah-caved in head, broken jaw, finger hanging off...it shows how brutal the attack by the two girls was. It switches next to the home of Juliet where Hilda Hulme and boyfriend Bill Perry try to get the girls stories straight and start trying to destroy incriminating evidence. Juliet's diary is destroyed and their clothes are put in to be dry cleaned. Seriously, this is tampering with evidence and nothing was done about it!

The story the girls tell to the police continually changes, with everyone trying to ensure that Juliet gets away with it and the blame is placed just on Pauline. This plan unravels when Pauline is caught in her cell writing notes for new diary entries, notes that prove they were both in it together, as Pauline's diary later proves. It seems incredible that an innocent friendship could turn so toxic to a point where the girls aren't caring much about being murderers.

The story goes back to how they met, and shows that neither had the best family life. Bert and Honorah ran away together and pretended to be married, providing a strict upbringing for Pauline. Bert lied to police continually when questioned about abandoning his first family. Juliet was continually sent away from her family for long periods to live with distant relatives every time she got sick or when her parents got tired of her. It's not surprising that she was troubled and aloof to them as she got older, feeling neglected and abandoned. Juliet changed school so often that she had trouble making friends and didn't really bother with anyone until she met Pauline.

The actual murder was thought to be because Honorah wanted to stop the girls being together after the Hulme's upcoming divorce. Juliet was to be sent to relatives in South Africa and Pauline wanted to go with her. The dreadful Hulmes pretended that they wanted the girls to stay together, even talking about passports and plans for the future. This was to keep Juliet calm until they were ready to send her away, and their cruel lies made it look as if it was only Honorah that stood in the way. This was what led to Pauline's plan to kill her mother. I blame the selfishness of the Hulmes painting Honorah as the bad guy for the poor woman's murder.

What stood out for me was the cold arrogance and indifference to the crime during the aftermath of the murder and trial. Frankly, Juliet never seemed to give a damn about anything but herself. She was even happy to sacrifice Pauline if it became necessary. She comes across as a total sociopath. Even those who watched her in prison said she never showed the slightest bit of remorse for the murder. However, Pauline reached out to her family and did seem to show remorse and be troubled about destroying her family. Once away from Juliet in a different prison her attitude changes and on her release she becomes a recluse that turns to religion. Juliet changed her name to Anne Perry and became a famous crime writer.

As a finale to the disgusting Hulmes, at the end of the trial they gave one of the lawyers a Parker pen to say thanks for your efforts. Parker was also Pauline's surname, the name she was charged under. Can you believe how twisted that is???

This is THE book to read if you are a fan of Heavenly Creatures, or have an interest in true crime.

kathiej's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Good descriptions of attachment issues in this stor of two young girls I enjoyed reading about the after effects of World War II. Seems like many are having to repeat these things today.