Scan barcode
maidmarianlib's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Death, Sexual content, and Murder
vagrantheather's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.25
There were a lot of plot devices I disliked. Death's fascination with (and interference on behalf of) our MC feels like grooming. A wealthy orphan girl being passed along to a home full of constant ribald parties - unlikely, given the time period, but plausible for a smutty regency book. However it doesn't go there - it ISN'T a smutty regency book where our innocent young heroine finds herself in a scandalous situation. So it feels unnecessarily edgy on part of the author.
The garden fiasco and overall vibe (mansion estate, ghosts, death, a sexy servant boy) summon The Secret Garden. And I love TSG! But the garden ends up being basically unnecessary. There's some waffley excuse that spirits can't communicate well when removed from their place of (death? Burial? Can't recall), but the whole "ahh I must find this secret garden then KILL MYSELF to gain entry" was so unnecessary. Surely the spirit could talk to you from, idk, the other side of the wall? And could you really not think of a single other way to enter a locked garden than by poisoning yourself to summon death's powers of intangibility? Maybe try looking under a rock for the key? Or ask the servant for a key? Or look for a key in the mansion? Maybe try scaling a nearby tree? Maybe stand on the horse's back to hop over? So many options that don't require summoning your professed enemy.
I was very disappointed by the author's tendency to distinguish characters by hair and skin color. The characters were mostly thin/flat.
The author puts in place a mechanism for Signa to play God by taking one life to spare another, but ultimately does very little with this theme. She was essentially A-OK with having murdered an old aunt to spare her young cousin. Sure, she didn't know what she was doing, but after finding out her power the guilt was a short lived thing, easily shrugged off. Flimsy.
It's an enjoyable read, but shallowly developed and ultimately forgettable.
Graphic: Death
Moderate: Murder, Chronic illness, Fire/Fire injury, and Terminal illness
Minor: Self harm, Death of parent, and Sexual content
nataliebootlah's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
Graphic: Death
Minor: Sexual content, Murder, and Death of parent
jessiereads98's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
Moderate: Grief, Vomit, Death, and Murder
Minor: Death of parent, Sexual content, and Child abuse
ambenicole418's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Honestly, it’s not the age difference that weirds me out about Signa x Death, it’s really the fact that Death has been watching and protecting Signa since she was a BABY, and for more than half of the book he acts as if he’s her father and not a potential love interest. I mean he does things like, killing off all of her family members because they didn’t treat Signa as kindly as he wanted them to, saving Blythe so Signa could go to Thorn Grove because he wanted her in a “safe and stable home”, he calls her “Little Bird” which frankly sounds like the nickname you would give to a child, and then when Signa refuses to let Death train her on how to use her powers he puts on his Dad voice and commands her to meet him at midnight for training. Ms. Adalyn creates this whole power imbalance between Death and Signa and spends the first half of the book setting Death up as if he’s going to be Signa’s father figure/mentor. It got to the point that by the time the tea party happens, I got whiplash because Death has a full 180 in his personality and starts acting like a jealous lover. The change is his demeanor was so drastic and came out of nowhere that I had to flip back through the book because I felt like I was missing something. How am I supposed to believe Death is her love interest when you write lines like:
“Why is it you are so polite to others? So demure and soft yet bullish when we speak? Ask me kindly, Signa.”
“Death spoke as though Signa were a child. As though she were a small, fragile thing that needed to be coddled.” (remind you Signa is 19 years old, so why is he talking to her as if she’s a child???)
It has to be either gaslighting or Ms. Adalyn just SET OUT to create a creepily paternalistic relationship between them because how are these lines said about the love interest?? It certainly didn’t help that the romance was incredibly inorganic, Death literally admitted that the only reason he’s interested in Signa at all is because she shares his powers and can’t be killed by his touch, and Death says things like,
“I have waited for you for a very long time, Signa.”
Like yeah Death, we know, you’ve been watching Signa since she was a baby and she’s 19 now, so you’ve been watching and waiting for about……….19 years for Signa to become legal 💀.
Outside of Signa being in a relationship with her father-boyfriend, the book is really just average. It reads like a lot of other YA books that are popular on social media. It’s not bad. The main mystery is just fairly predictable and nothing to write home about. So, the book was fine I just couldn’t vibe with Signa being in a relationship with this creepily paternalistic and groomy shadow.
Graphic: Death, Death of parent, and Grief
Moderate: Sexual content and Vomit
kstacy91's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Graphic: Death and Death of parent
Moderate: Vomit and Blood
Minor: Sexual content
tialyr's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Moderate: Sexual content
kswartz's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Child abuse and Murder
Minor: Body horror, Sexual content, and Vomit
xtsukix's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
4.5
Graphic: Misogyny, Death, Death of parent, Grief, Murder, Suicide attempt, and Vomit
Moderate: Injury/Injury detail, Sexual content, Animal death, Blood, Body shaming, Alcohol, and Fire/Fire injury
Minor: Pandemic/Epidemic
margarethansen's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Graphic: Violence and Death
Moderate: Sexual content