Reviews

Lord Foul's Bane by Stephen R. Donaldson

scheu's review

Go to review page

5.0

EDIT: I just finished my probably fifth read-through of the first book, having completed the Grim Oak Press reissues (which are lovely). I found myself reflecting on different aspects this time than I had before. I very much wanted to focus on Covenant's feelings over
Spoilerhis rape of Lena, to help put his later actions and reactions in context.
I also wanted to think about some odd memories I had about the story - like, this enormous Land with so few people in it - and the kind and compassionate people who DO populate the Land, in contrast to Covenant.

I'm glad that I still enjoy the series as much as I do.

2007 REVIEW: The Thomas Covenant books have always held a special place in my heart. I freely admit that the series is not for everyone; the singular nature of the protagonist turns a lot of readers away before the first book (this one) is halfway finished.

Compared to other heroic fantasy, I find the Covenant books to be somehow more believable, and to have more emotional impact. The theme of redemption, present throughout the series, resonated with me when I first read the books twenty years ago, and continues to resonate with me.

ianl1963's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Audio not up to present day standards.

Not as good as I remember but people change!

loonyboi's review

Go to review page

1.0

Wow, I hated this book. The plot isn't dissimilar to [b:A Princess of Mars|40395|A Princess of Mars (Barsoom, #1)|Edgar Rice Burroughs|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1332272118s/40395.jpg|1129624] crossed with a bit of [b:The Lord of the Rings|33|The Lord of the Rings (The Lord of the Rings, #1-3)|J.R.R. Tolkien|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1388181159s/33.jpg|3462456]. The difference between this and those books is that the protagonist of this novel is utterly and completely unlikable. He's a leper, which is a clever twist, but good lord, he's unpleasant. His self loathing isn't amusing, it's annoying. Even when he's seemingly cured of his afflictions he's unbearably gloomy. Oh, and he expresses his return to health through a brutal sexual assault on a sixteen year old girl. Maybe he was under the thrall of a dark lord during that act, maybe not. It's not clear, and the author doesn't seem to care much.

So yes. I loathed this book. I always finish what I start, but this was a slog I had to push through. I have no plans to read the others in the series. One was quite enough for me, thanks.

taylstark's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I didn't dislike it because Covenant was a contemptible character. I disliked it because it was a slogfest. Simply meh.

drbjjcarpenter's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Couldn't finish this book. Though the world was somewhat intriguing, the plot was overly contrived and the main character was entirely repugnant. Just not for me.

petealdin's review

Go to review page

Couldn't get through it.

steven_v's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

This is the first novel in the first of trilogy of the Covenant series. The series follows a man from our world, Thomas Covenant, as he is (apparently) transported to a magical fantasy world called The Land. I say "apparently" because Covenant is convinced throughout most of the novel, and indeed most of the series, that the experience is an hallucination -- a dream wrought by his mind after losing consciousness in an accident.

I confess that I have read this series three times before -- this last reading is my 4th -- and I am still not certain if The Land is a dream, or if it is real. I waver back and forth from book to book and even chapter to chapter sometimes. There is evidence on both sides. And I think this is one of the reasons why the Chronicles are among my favorite fantasies of all times, ranking up there with Lord of the Rings... the ambiguity adds so much to the series. And it all begins with this novel.

Lord Foul's Bane gets us off to an admittedly slow start -- we meet Covenant, who is walking into town to pay his phone bill in person to avoid being completely shut away by his community. Covenant, you see, is a leper. This is the central, defining feature of his character. He was diagnosed with leprosy about a year before the novel. His wife left him because of it, taking his son. He has no feeling in his extremities. He has to survey his limbs repeatedly to scan for injuries. And his fellow man has ostracized him. They don't even want him to come to town to shop for groceries.

The novel is slow at this early stage, and I admit the first time I read it, I almost put it down here (I was also in 8th grade, and perhaps not ready for a novel like this). The leprosy chapter, in particular, can be off-putting. But this early section is critical. It sets the stage for Covenant's later behavior. Many have complained that Covenant is unlikable. I think they are being unfair to him. As LFB clearly shows in its first several chapters, Covenant has had an unbelievable amount of psychological abuse heaped upon him by the rest of society. He has had to develop behaviors to protect himself as much as possible from this abusive treatment. It isn't just physical injury he must train himself to avoid, but the emotional injury from the cruel and unforgiving people around him.

And then he falls down and hits his head and wakes up in a fantasy world where suddenly everyone is nice to him.

It is no surprise that he thinks this is a dream -- that his mind, bereft of all human contact, has invented a place where he is welcomed, even viewed as a reincarnated hero. He thinks his mind created an escape from the emotional torture. He fears that if he gives in to this escape, and accepts it, he will either never wake up, or even worse, he will wake up having lost his defenses, which will leave him emotionally vulnerable to the relentless psychological abuse that his fellow man will continue to heap upon him due to his leprosy. Understood in this context, Covenant's reaction to The Land is not so surprising.

That said, Covenant does some pretty despicable things in The Land (I won't state them for spoilers). And he fails. A lot. But he also shows some very real humanity. At one point in self defense he kills, not humans, but twisted monsters. Even the Land dwellers around him, who swore an Oath of Peace, killed these monsters in battle, and they did not consider doing so to have broken their oath. But the killing upsets Covenant and makes him swear never to raise his hand again. He does not want to kill -- even monsters. This is not an act of cowardice. It is an act of mercy from someone who is implicitly non-violent.

Additionally, although he mostly shrugs off his most despicable act early in the novel and seems to forget about it, toward the end he is reminded of this act, and then he shows the guilt and sorrow you would expect. In later books he continues to punish himself over it (rightly so -- he was pretty awful in that moment). Here again, we can see that Covenant is not a monster -- just a man who was pushed beyond all human endurance psychologically, and who has only a limited capacity to deal with this emotional torture.

Beyond Covenant, there is much richness in this novel. Donaldson's prose style is unique and almost lyrical. It may take some getting used to, but I quite enjoy his evocative turns of phrase. He comes up with some of the most inventive similes and metaphors, and he does this on such a regular basis, that I can't imagine how he comes up with them all. Equally enjoyable is the symbolic nature of the events and even the world: The Land is a metaphor for Covenant himself, and the corruption wrought by the Despiser symbolizes Covenant's leprosy. Thus the constant struggle against Lord Foul's machinations is an externalization of Covenant's struggle against giving in to his disease -- succumbing to its inevitable conclusion of rot and decay. We get visual descriptions of this "wrongness" at multiple points in the book. Thus we can view LFB and the other books as the story of a leper's struggle against the rot of his disease, externalized as a battle to save The Land. This makes the "is it real or is it a dream?" question even weightier, and is one of my favorite aspects of the novel.

In the end, you're probably never going to love the Thomas Covenant character, in the sense that you'd want him over to dinner -- though I certainly loved other characters in this story that much, such as Bannor, Mhoram, and Foamfollower. Still, I developed a grudging respect for the man by the end of this novel. Between that and my adoration for the beautiful world Donaldson invented, I was happy to move on to the 2nd book after reading this one.

angemelb's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

moosta2112's review against another edition

Go to review page

Wanted to read more interesting things, taking time away from darker fantasy

mikehex's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Re-read after.... a long time. It holds up.

This series is probably in the top 3 most influential reads in my life. While I could still appreciate easy, guilty-pleasure reads, after Thomas Covenant, I knew when I was reading them. So going back was always risky. But, it's still great. (Although I don't think it passes the Gap Cycle on my favorites list)

Reviewing the traditional pros and cons:
Pros:
The land and the characters: Both of these aren't as featured as in the follow-on books. This one is truly about what's going in Covenant's head. But there are hints of what's coming: Foamfollower, the Ranyhym, the Celebration of Spring. This is what the traditional fantasy fan likes in these stories.

Thomas Covenant's head: This is what supposedly raises the stories above normal fantasy. Re-reading it now, it's clear that this is a ongoing description of someone's walk through depression. It's fascinating.

Cons:
Donaldson's Thesaurus: I never really noticed the issue with the vocabulary used. Not that I know what every word means, but most of the time it's obvious in context.

Covenant's infamous action and general jerkiness: I know some people can't get passed one or both of these, but they don't bother me. The action is treated as a totally bad thing and the jerkiness is part of the package. You deal with it to get the good parts, where the good parts can be the reaction of the other good guys to the jerkiness.

So, my opinion hasn't changed. It's a iconic piece of the written fantasy history and it deserves that place.