Scan barcode
raptorq's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Animal death, Hate crime, Religious bigotry, Abandonment, and Classism
Moderate: Violence and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Colonisation
kate_den_herder's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Animal death, Blood, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Bullying, Emotional abuse, Mental illness, Xenophobia, Religious bigotry, Gaslighting, and Abandonment
Minor: Child death
Margaret has some undiagnosed PTSD, so there are some flashbackscyntismiles's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
A HUGE barrier in reading this for me was the audiobook narrator. The New York accents were...subpar (to be nice). The actual text is not written in an accent but in standard English. It is mentioned that Wes has an accent ~1 time and never specifies what that accent is. A character just recognizes that he's "from the city based on his accent". It's not set in NY (we will get to the setting later) but theoretically could be implied based on some religious/time period references but considering the setting is a whole mess, I don't think it was necessary. On top of the unfavorable New York/East Coast accents, the audiobook narrator gave some other characters other below-average accents. I think it's one thing to be able to do an accent for a bit or a 15-minute routine but this was upwards of 6 hours (assuming Wes speaks about 1/2 of the time) of an accent. I don't think they should have done it! It took me so long to get into the book because I would hear Wes say about 3 things, roll my eyes, and turn it off.
Once I got over that (I pushed through for the sister read!), I enjoyed the story! I think my sister had a much better time since she could just read the story. I thought the hunt would feature more heavily but I ended up enjoying the character-driven plot once we figured out some backstory about the characters. I think the character development was good and I ended up really rooting for them (despite my initial reaction of "come on guys!" to their shenanigans). I especially enjoyed watching Margaret's character be unveiled to the reader and her development throughout the book.
The setting of this book was ambiguous at best. I think if you don't need a deeply rooted setting it's fine. If you do, you may want to skip this. It was uniquely a mish-mash of a ton of stuff, especially time period-wise. Stella and I had a great time tracking all the different things mentioned from different time periods. It feels very pre-industrial union but also features things from the late 1900's so that was wild. The setting felt very PNW with the redwood trees coastal descriptions but implied that it was the East Coast with Irish "Catholic-implied" immigrants. There is definitely a sense of place but of what place, who knows! It's definitely a fantasy setting but the amount of real-world items that are from all around the late 1800's-late 1900's made it feel like a wibbly wobbly time.
The hunt is in the background the whole time but really takes backseat. It reminds me of how in _HP and the Goblet of Fire_, the Triwizard Tournament is important but kind of ebbs and flows out of the narrative. The characters still do other stuff and it isn't shaping every waking moment of their lives. The hunt in this book is definitely less present than that but that's what I'm reminded of vs something like the Hunger Games. In _The Hunger Games_, the Games are constantly shaping the narrative and the character's decisions/ability to survive. The hunt is nowhere near that relevant in _A Far Wilder Magic_.
The romance was fine? I definitely enjoyed them getting to know each other and becoming friends the best but that's an opinion I commonly hold. It was really sweet but sometimes the pacing was weird. It may be the whole teenage relationship thing and I am quite done with that area of life. It definitely wasn't bad though. I did end up rooting for them and wanting them to be together by the end if that's any indication!
Lastly, my favorite part of this whole book was the dog, excuse me, hound, Trouble. Literally any time he was mentioned I was ecstatic! He was truly the best and I love him very much! Also, that is somehow the best name for a dog. Who would not love to call "Trouble?" and have a hound run your way? So many good scenarios to say "I'll bring Trouble" or "I'll give you Trouble". What a genius move!
I would recommend this book if you are looking for:
--A Grumpy/Introvert and Sunshine/Extrovert friendship and romance,
--Commentary of religious prejudices (this book specifically deals with religions meant to represent the conflicts between Catholicism, Judaism, and Protestantism in the US reminiscent of tensions in the early-mid 1900's)
--A character-driven plot and following the story where it goes
I would not recommend this book if:
--Having real-world time markers from all over the place is an issue for you
--You are only interested in the actual hunt
--You would not like to read about the effects of having a neglectful/abusive parent
Graphic: Child abuse
Moderate: Animal death and Child abuse
k0n0's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Graphic: Bullying, Emotional abuse, Hate crime, Panic attacks/disorders, Racial slurs, Racism, Toxic relationship, Xenophobia, Religious bigotry, and Abandonment
Moderate: Animal death
Minor: Self harm
Toxic parent and abandonment of teen child which obviously causes some trauma and a panic disorder. Lots and lots of religious bigotry and racism in this book.akemi_sato's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Animal death, Gore, Violence, Xenophobia, Blood, and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Bullying, Sexual content, Death of parent, and Abandonment
Minor: Child death
pointeshoebookworm's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
0.5
Graphic: Bullying, Gore, Violence, Xenophobia, Antisemitism, Religious bigotry, and Abandonment
Moderate: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Child death, and Sexual content
Minor: Emotional abuse and Alcohol
moonytoast's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.75
ALSO FUCK EVELYN WELTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Graphic: Gore, Panic attacks/disorders, Xenophobia, Blood, Religious bigotry, Abandonment, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Animal death, Child death, Cursing, Death, Emotional abuse, Gore, and Sexual content
graycloudsnsuch's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Moderate: Animal death, Racism, Violence, and Xenophobia
maartabarrales's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Animal death, Bullying, Child abuse, Emotional abuse, Xenophobia, and Abandonment
Minor: Child death
chronicacademia's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
I assumed from everything I knew that this book was historical fiction. And as I closed the book, I couldn’t help but wonder why it wasn’t historical fiction.
The world building was needlessly confusing because it was thinly veiled enough for the reader to know that it was thinly veiled portrayals of real religions, ethnicities, and places. But it relied heavily on the reader knowing exactly what the author thinly veiled that anyone who doesn’t have a great grasp on American history will be scrambling to understand what exactly it is that’s happening. I’ll confess I still don’t completely know what time period this book took place in. But I figured out that New Albion is New York, Yu’adir is Jewish faith/people, Katharist is Protestantism/protestants (it took me 100 pages to figure this out; I initially thought it was Catholicism and it threw me for a loop), Sumic is Catholic/catholicism (it was the mention of rosaries and the Catholic prayer that tipped me off 100 pages in; I originally thought Sumic was an ethnicity), and Banvishman was Irish(?) (I’m honestly still not 100% sure about that last one). The first 150 pages had me flailing to translate the world building—and it left me wondering why the author didn’t just write a loose historical fantasy with a secret society. It took me so much longer to understand and find my feet in this book than the average fantasy, and it detracted from my enjoyment and my ability to get into the book.
The plot was slow. I’d expected a days/weeks long fox hunt that took up most of the story. Instead, there are weeks between when the fox shows up in the first chapter and when the hunt begins in the last 50(ish). And the hunt only takes up a measly few chapters at the end of the book. Most of the book was spent with two characters who were hopelessly pining after each other, but too stubborn to admit it while the fox destroys farmland and tries to kill people and no one tries to stop it. It left me wondering why the hunt took so long to commence; if the fox was so destructive, why wait to hunt it?
And if the characters weren’t so easy to love, this probably wouldn’t be a 5 star review. But damnit; I loved every minute of rooting for them to get together. This book is really a romance disguised as a fantasy, and I’m not sad about it. Wes and Margaret came alive on the pages. There was something so real about them and their struggles, their hesitancy to love. I loved the way the dynamics with Wes’s family were written. His sisters reminded me of my own and endeared me all the more to him. And Margaret’s character arc had me sobbing. These two characters, who were beautifully and perfectly written, shine brighter than any issue I took with the plot or the world building. On more than one instance, I felt myself getting teary eyed over both of them.
I personally felt the ADHD/dyslexia and PTSD were handled sensitively. I should also say—the fox hunt portion was well researched; it made my heart happy to read it in a fantasy world.
Was this a great fantasy book? No. But it’s an excellent romance with top tier character development and an ending that will make you shed all the happy tears. I don’t often reread books, but I know I’ll return to the pages of this one time and time again. I will be screaming my praise of this book to strangers in bookstores for many years to come.
Graphic: Animal death, Xenophobia, and Antisemitism