You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.39 AVERAGE
3.39 AVERAGE
adventurous
mysterious
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
adventurous
dark
mysterious
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
dark
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
Loveable characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
3.5 Well that was interesting, as any H.G. Wells book but definitely not as good as The Time Machine or the perfection of The War of the Worlds. Anyway, Wells had a great idea and it was delivered in a very sophisticated way. Don't start reading the author with this one, you might find it a bit boring.
Buena lectura sin dudas. Wells ha tenido las mas grandes ideas de SF, pero definitivamente tiene sus picos altos y El Hombre Invisible no es uno de ellos.
Con ya 3 libros leídos del autor puedo asegurar que b>, siempre llega un punto durante la lectura en que empieza a hablar de ciencia y me atrapa sin mas. El problema fue todo el demás desarrollo que fue algo repetitivo a mitad de novela, y los personajes, el principal es tan odioso que estas esperando a que muera en cualquier momento.
Aun asi me he propuesto leer lo mas posible del autor y ver cuanto mas me puede sorprender.
Buena lectura sin dudas. Wells ha tenido las mas grandes ideas de SF, pero definitivamente tiene sus picos altos y El Hombre Invisible no es uno de ellos.
Con ya 3 libros leídos del autor puedo asegurar que b>
Aun asi me he propuesto leer lo mas posible del autor y ver cuanto mas me puede sorprender.
This has been on my tbr for some time I enjoy hg wells. It's always incredible to be what people come up with. I think it's definitely worth you're time if you're into sci-fi
I think I expected a little more from this one. I'm not sure why. It was ok, but I had to tell myself to read it more than I was drawn to it.
Well, at least I got this classic done.
Well, at least I got this classic done.
adventurous
dark
mysterious
tense
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
The third of the HG Wells box set I’ve picked up, and definitely one of his more infamous characters. Even if you didn’t actually know the story, as I didn’t, you know the image of the bandaged, hiding in plain sight invisible man. So fun to think of this “what would YOU do if you had invisibility powers?” thought experiment play out in this way like it is still debated at water coolers and playgrounds today.
As with the rest of Wells’s invention of this type of sci-fi, I find I really enjoy the matter of fact, reporting, telling of a retelling story. It reminds me of the Sherlock Holmes novels I recently read (interesting mentions of sportsmanship and fairness in the car and mouse chase), as well as the other origination of sci fi in Frankenstein. I think I’m just coming to find I really enjoy the 1800s-early 1900s style of British literature— gothic and tense and mysteriously and serialized! And clearly murderous reigns of terror were on the mind.
In terms of the story, what I felt I wanted more of is the inner monologue of Griffin. Show me his ethical dilemma, his struggle, earn his ‘breaking bad’ moment more! As he loses accountability and empathy he becomes a truly deplorable figure— I want more of a slow burn there!
But the tense building of action worked well for me— I truly wish I could have read in the original form of chapters published in magazines over time without a preconceived understanding of this invisible man!
In terms of themes while reading this in modern day, it felt like a prescient commentary on things like digital crimes and invasion of privacy in a cyber way: what would you get away with of people wouldn’t know? Is there an equivalent moral quandary of stealing bread to feed your family? How do you deal with reading fantastical, unbelievable accounts in the news? And for sci fi themes that become tropes— just because you can does that mean you should? What are the impacts of unintended consequences when pursuing selfish gain? Who can actually resist the possibility of immense power? And when there’s asymmetry in information, who can you trust and who can trust you?
While I really enjoyed this, I couldn't feel sorry for Griffin. Perhaps if he hadn't been quite so mean-spirited, or had a good reason to be that way, I may have enjoyed this more.
I’m not sure if Wells’ talent progressed and developed over the three books of his I’ve read to date, but I suspect the fact that each book bears a unique quality is deliberate and more down to talent. Wells presents each book, from The Time Machine to The War of the Worlds and now The Invisible Man, in quite different ways, using a unique voice for each. Personally, the last of these three is my current favourite, possessing many of the literary traits I enjoy from this period.
But, and although I can see exactly why Wells explored the depths of invisibility and its disadvantages, I have to admit I think he dragged things out just a little too long. Perhaps a short story would have been more impactful, although not as contemplative.
All in all, this is a great read, even if the characters can seem a little comical by today’s standards, and if you’re looking at reading Wells for the first time, this is the perfect place to start.
But, and although I can see exactly why Wells explored the depths of invisibility and its disadvantages, I have to admit I think he dragged things out just a little too long. Perhaps a short story would have been more impactful, although not as contemplative.
All in all, this is a great read, even if the characters can seem a little comical by today’s standards, and if you’re looking at reading Wells for the first time, this is the perfect place to start.