Scan barcode
catherinedsharp's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Graphic: Sexual content, Toxic relationship, and Fatphobia
beckyyreadss's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Medical trauma
Moderate: Chronic illness, Medical content, Body shaming, and Sexual content
Minor: Fatphobia and Infertility
magic_multicolored_miracle's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
While Stacey is just as loveable and relatable as Emily, and many of our favorite characters return for this modern Cyrano-esque tale (a comparison the text also makes) so much taking place in email exchanges and texts makes the story fall a little flatter, lacking the vibrance of the first book's interactions.
The ending also feels more rushed and misplaced, with all of the work to get the relationship back on track after the third act derail falling to Stacey, with Daniel taking little agency throughout the book.
Moderate: Sexual content and Cursing
Minor: Fatphobia
mycatnorbert's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Graphic: Medical content and Medical trauma
Moderate: Panic attacks/disorders, Body shaming, Fatphobia, and Infertility
magpie7's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Graphic: Sexual content
Minor: Fatphobia, Gaslighting, Misogyny, and Medical content
avidreaderandgeekgirl's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.75
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Chronic illness, Fatphobia, and Medical content
Minor: Infertility
perpetualpages's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
As someone who really enjoyed Well Met, I'm surprised to say that I was somewhat disappointed with Well Played.
While the first book heavily revolves around Emily discovering the Renaissance Faire circuit and becoming part of a vibrant community that helps her find a new purpose in life, Well Played takes a very different route in that a large portion of the story takes place during the off-season. Because the Faire is what ties this romance trilogy together, I was hoping to see more of it, and without that draw, there isn't anything particularly compelling about this companion/sequel, at least for me.
The main element I struggled with was the "mysterious messenger" trope. While I think it's fun to explore the trope of mistaken identity and the phenomenon of falling in love with "the wrong person," the problem lies in that the true identity of Stacey's suitor is entirely obvious from the first chapter. I will couch that criticism by clarifying that I don't think that "predictability" is a bad thing or an indication of "bad writing," in any sense. As readers, we have to believe a story when something is revealed to us, and if we're able to predict what's going to happen, that means the writing is doing what it's supposed to do.
So, no, I don't think it's inherently a bad thing to know who's the real love interest, but I also think it's hard for the story to maintain that kind of narrative tension when it's no secret who's really behind these "love notes." And because the love interest is obvious, it feels like the courting portion of the story goes on for entirely too long. You already know there's going to be a confrontation where Stacey and her love interest hash out their miscommunication, and because it's obvious that the romance can't go forward *without* that confrontation, it's hard to stay invested in this prolonged courtship.
And then, frankly, when they do inevitably get together, it's sweet and endearing, but it's ultimately not much of a standout romance—again, at least for me. So the pay-off ultimately doesn't balance out the prolonged waiting.
I also wanted to see more personal progression with Stacey *outside* of the romance. Her main conflict is that she feels lost in life because she put off her career to stay home and help her mom work through her illness. But it feels like that choice, that confusion, is sanctified or validated only *because* she made a selfless choice, and not because the corporate ladder and our definitions of "success" are not a conducive framework for everyone's well-being or happiness. Then it seems like the romantic relationship she falls into acts as a solution to her conflict. She doesn't change anything about herself or her situation; instead her life is changed or "improved" after she falls in love with a guy and molds her life to fit his. I thought that conflict could've been pushed further and I didn't really vibe with the latent messages underscoring how it was handled.
If I'm being honest, I think this book is merely acting as connective tissue between Books 1 and 3, which are about the two sisters. All I can say is that if I do pick up the third book (which I'm only considering because A) fake dating is my favorite trope and B) I tend to be a completionist) it will have to be through my library.
Ultimately, this story still has sweet, heartwarming, and even funny moments, and it definitely wasn't the worst way to spend a couple of days, either. I'm sad to report that I didn't love it as much as the first book, but I'm still glad I gave it a chance.
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Chronic illness and Fatphobia
andmaggie's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Toxic relationship and Chronic illness
Minor: Fatphobia, Medical trauma, Infertility, and Medical content
walzstjrnl's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
I enjoyed the small town and renaissance fair backdrop, as well as the cast of characters. I appreciated Stacey's internal journey as well, and found myself nodding along at portions.
Graphic: Sexual content
Minor: Body shaming, Death of parent, and Fatphobia
I will add thatmorganperks's review
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Fatphobia