Scan barcode
chalkletters's review against another edition
emotional
inspiring
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Despite my best efforts to keep track of who was who in Little Men, I opened Jo’s Boys to a bewildering array of names. The events of the book were enough that I eventually figured out Tom, Stuffy and Josie, but I had to resort to Google to remind me of Jack, Dolly, Ned, Dick and Billy. Obviously, a school the size of Plumfield needs to be well peopled, but Louisa May Alcott may have tried to spread the attention too thinly between all these boys, as only some of them are sufficiently memorable.
As usual with Louisa May Alcott’s writing, it’s the characters who develop over the course of the novel that really stand out. In this case: Nat, Dan, Ted and Josie. Dan’s story is particularly heartbreaking, and while the ending is probably realistic, it feels like less than he deserved, especially in comparison to almost everyone else’s most-cherished desires coming true. That said, the relationship between Dan and Mrs Jo is enviable to the very last and is the greatest triumph of both these sequels.
Other romances are less doomed than poor Dan’s, and while they’re all sweet enough, Louisa May Alcott did a good job of balancing them out with Nan. Her refusal to bow to heteronormative pressure to find a husband is not only explicit and explicitly praised, she also gets the chance to monologue on the subject of why she doesn’t want a husband.
The March sisters and Laurie continue to delight. Mrs Meg’s mingled horror and admiration that her daughter inherited her flair for dramatics and wants to make a career of it was particularly enjoyable, as was her relationship with her older children becoming adults. The only fly in the ointment comes at the end, when the narrator expresses a desire to call up an earthquake to end the series. It feels like Louisa May Alcott’s way of saying she’s tired of these characters, which somewhat tarnishes a reader’s enjoyment of them.
Similarly, there’s a section early in the novel where Mrs Jo has to deal with autograph-hunters and the effects of her own celebrity. For anyone who has read a biography of Louisa May Alcott (or the annotations in Little Women), this section feels a little too lazily drawn from life. Overall, there’s a sense that the narrator (who is probably the author) doesn’t really want to be writing this book at all, which might make the reader for guilty for enjoying it.
As a long time fan, I came away from Jo’s Boys with mixed feelings, but I definitely want to read more of Louisa May Alcott’s work and see what she did with characters other than the March family.
Content Warnings
Minor: Death of parent, Injury/Injury detail, and Death
charlottebreads's review against another edition
emotional
funny
lighthearted
slow-paced
3.5
CW/TW: Murder, death, prison
Age Rating: 12+
- The boys were still great. Tom was as crazy as ever. Dan, Demi and Nat were still my favourites. I liked Dan and Nat's character development. I liked that, when they realised what they had done, they though of Jo and Laurie, and what they would say.
- I really liked Emil. There wasn't that much on him in Little Men, but in Jo's Boys he did some pretty cool stuff.
- I thought the girls could have been mentioned more. I thought that Daisy and Nat were cute, but that was all that happened to her. Nan did some cool stuff though. I liked how she ended up. She is still as crazy as ever.
- Bess was still the all powerful and I LOVED itttttt.
- Josie and Ted were so chaotic
- The March sisters were great. I liked that Jo got back into writing and it was funny how much she disliked being "famous." Amy and Meg was so protective over their children it was funny.
- Laurie was as chaotic as usual. He and Jo during the play was so funny to me.
- The plot was fine. Emil and Nat had some drama, and I was a little upset about what happened to Dan. I thought it undid some of the things that happened in Little Men, like Jack's progress after stealing from Tommy.
- I thought that Stuffy could have gone through more character development.
Age Rating: 12+
- The boys were still great. Tom was as crazy as ever. Dan, Demi and Nat were still my favourites. I liked Dan and Nat's character development. I liked that, when they realised what they had done, they though of Jo and Laurie, and what they would say.
- I really liked Emil. There wasn't that much on him in Little Men, but in Jo's Boys he did some pretty cool stuff.
- I thought the girls could have been mentioned more. I thought that Daisy and Nat were cute, but that was all that happened to her. Nan did some cool stuff though. I liked how she ended up. She is still as crazy as ever.
- Bess was still the all powerful and I LOVED itttttt.
- Josie and Ted were so chaotic
- The March sisters were great. I liked that Jo got back into writing and it was funny how much she disliked being "famous." Amy and Meg was so protective over their children it was funny.
- Laurie was as chaotic as usual. He and Jo during the play was so funny to me.
- The plot was fine. Emil and Nat had some drama, and I was a little upset about what happened to Dan. I thought it undid some of the things that happened in Little Men, like Jack's progress after stealing from Tommy.
- I thought that Stuffy could have gone through more character development.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Murder and Death
More...