Scan barcode
Reviews tagging 'Sexism'
Mindhunter: Inside the FBI's Elite Serial Crime Unit by John E. Douglas
5 reviews
taleofabibliophile's review against another edition
4.0
Graphic: Pedophilia, Racial slurs, Murder, Violence, Body horror, Sexism, Gore, Sexual violence, Sexual assault, Injury/Injury detail, Confinement, Racism, Rape, Medical content, Torture, Gun violence, Misogyny, and Death
Moderate: Animal death, Suicide, and Animal cruelty
Minor: Police brutality, Car accident, Cannibalism, and Alcoholism
jnreads's review against another edition
5.0
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Antisemitism, Child abuse, Death of parent, Gun violence, Kidnapping, Blood, Cannibalism, Death, Drug use, Hate crime, Abandonment, Alcohol, Gaslighting, Torture, Toxic relationship, Animal cruelty, Animal death, Domestic abuse, Mass/school shootings, Murder, Bullying, Emotional abuse, Child death, Drug abuse, Medical content, Panic attacks/disorders, Suicide attempt, Terminal illness, Medical trauma, Mental illness, Sexual harassment, Miscarriage, Misogyny, Police brutality, Racial slurs, Racism, Rape, Self harm, Pedophilia, Sexual assault, Sexism, Sexual violence, Stalking, Suicide, Trafficking, Sexual content, and Violence
sailorgidae's review against another edition
5.0
Graphic: Death, Gore, Panic attacks/disorders, Injury/Injury detail, Violence, Body horror, Rape, Misogyny, Blood, Murder, Kidnapping, Torture, Suicide, Sexual violence, Sexual assault, Sexual harassment, Sexism, Racism, Mental illness, Hate crime, Domestic abuse, Cursing, Animal cruelty, Racial slurs, and Pedophilia
meigs's review against another edition
3.0
If you do read this book approach it with a massive caveat: it’s exceptionally dated. Reading it with the lens of 2022 might make it unreadable to some unfortunately. The first issue is the machismo in the book. Douglas is self-aggrandizing to the point of eye roll. He takes every opportunity to praise himself as well as settle extremely off topic petty scores. He sounds like such a blow hard, which is unfortunate because I’m sure he’s a genius and he’s got to be an incredibly sensitive person because he’s so astute at his work. His arrogance doesn’t do him any favors in this book. I was able to tolerate him through the book by telling myself that hopefully the editor and co-writer made his ego much bigger than it was due to the era of the book. There’s also tons of outdated terminology (Macdonald triad which has since been essentially debunked), junk science referenced through out the book (teeth impressions, hair analysis, etc.) and cases referred to as still open (The Green River Killer, BTK, Unibomber - although this seems to sort have been edited?), as well as super outdated attitudes towards women and sex workers. The way he refers to women, girls, and sex workers is really hard to listen to. Praising women and girls for their looks and attitudes and often confirming that sex workers were disposable. Huge bummer. Douglas’ take on the death penalty is also outdated, and he proselytizes a lot throughout the book about it. If I never hear the phrase “ass pucker factor” again it’ll be too soon.
The book is extremely graphic to the point of excessive. It’s also probably much longer than it could be.
Overall if you can separate yourself from the above it’s an interesting listen. True crime is pretty problematic after all.
Graphic: Stalking, Gun violence, Injury/Injury detail, Misogyny, Torture, Child death, Gore, Murder, Pedophilia, Rape, Sexism, Death, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, and Violence
Exceptionally dated in its approach to victims, sexist, junk sciencezuly's review against another edition
2.0
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Child death, Death, Gun violence, Kidnapping, Pedophilia, Physical abuse, Police brutality, Rape, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, and Violence