gajeelsiron's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

emmaspaperbacks's review

Go to review page

dark medium-paced

3.0

oliviamich's review

Go to review page

dark informative reflective tense medium-paced

3.5

bntyle01's review

Go to review page

challenging dark tense slow-paced

2.0

michellelouise's review

Go to review page

dark informative mysterious reflective medium-paced

3.0

toulouse757's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative

3.0

ssv_normandy's review

Go to review page

dark informative mysterious medium-paced

3.75

ahonan's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

3.0

vesperops's review

Go to review page

informative reflective medium-paced

3.0

obstinateheadstrongcurl's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative mysterious medium-paced

3.5

This was an interesting story but I feel like the most fascinating and relevant bits were the appellate ruling and the third jury selection. Unfortunately this part was only covered briefly. I wish it would have gone a bit deeper.