Reviews

Mr. Monster by Dan Wells

eol's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

crowsandprose's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

While I greatly enjoyed I Am Not A Serial Killer, Wells' John Cleaver followup simply didn't reach the heights of the original. It took far too long to reach the meat of the plot, John's mental processes were muddled and less engaging, and the addition of the Mr. Monster made this feel far too Dexter derivative (and I hated Lidnsey's Dexter, but I loved the streamlined Showtime Dexter that scraped a lot of the crapoff the source material for the honest gems inside the base premise.)

That's the short bit: the longer bits come now.

We spend over 150 pages just meandering through John's life. He's got an FBI agent on his back, he'strying to figure out what to do with the object of his fixation, and thinking back to his big score a few months ago. Small town Clayton life is not all that interesting, and it makes for slow reading.

John doesn't understand human behavior, but has learned how to vaguely immitate it. I say vaguely, because where most sociopaths are skilled manipulators, John falls flat here. He lacks charisma, makes morbid jokes, and is generally known to be abnormal since he's working at the morgue with his mom. This also hurts our ability to engage with him, because his emotional state is flat and foreign. I know that's the crux of the book -- that's part of what makes him useful to his eventual captor. But it's inconsistent, and states his "John can't feel [blank]" as opposed to having more concrete sensory details. When his blood's up, why aren't we getting more of the rush? When he just can't bring himself to care about the torture victims, we should get some sort of cue that isn't just John telling us in the least emotionally engaging language.

This proves inconsistent through the work, though. Suddenly John longs for heroism and a break from his sociopathic nature. Is he honestly a sociopath then? If he realizes there is a right and a wrong, if he wants to do the RIGHT thing as opposed to the surival thing, the needs thing, is he honestly that disconnected? It betrays the whole conciet of the series, and leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth.

So which is it? Generic Teen Male hero with madness as a superpower (my least favorite trope in fiction) or a genuine teen predator who has simply found his fixation, and that other victims simply won't interest/cut it for him? That answer was never delivered. I don't know that it will be in the next book, either. (Which I own and will still read!)

Anyway -- it wasn't a bad book, but it left way too much in question, was far too slow, and wasn't internally consistent. On the other hand, it separated John and Brooke, gave us more demon understanding, and the action, once it got started, was top notch. So it's not all flaws, there were good bits to it. It's just wasn't what I was hoping for out of Wells and Cleaver.

nahlaaly56's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I DNF-ed this book... but then I Wikipedia-ed the rest of the book and other books in the series to know what happens next. Nothing against the writing, it just wasn't for me. It's a little too violent and disturbing for my taste.

mneiger's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

peterkeep's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Dan Wells really sucked me in on this one.

When I read [b: I Am Not A Serial Killer|7617119|I Am Not A Serial Killer (John Cleaver, #1)|Dan Wells|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1442065592s/7617119.jpg|6154629], I thought it was a pretty fun thriller that had some cool horror/fantasy elements, but not much more. It was fast and fun. The sequel, though, was a nice step forward. It was still fast and enjoyable to read, but it was a lot darker and showed off some more depth to the main character and his family.

John is definitely battling with his serial killer tendencies (Mr. Monster, he calls it) and it feels a bit more real and scary here. In I Am Not A Serial Killer he
Spoilerbrandishes a knife and is even violent to one of the innocent characters
, but it doesn't feel as real and terrifying as some of the things he's doing here. I have no clue how serial killers really act and feel other than the popular media's portrayal, but Dan Wells does a really believable job here.

I also really liked how the fallout of the Clayton Killer is dealt with. It was a bit less surprising this time when
Spoilersome of the supernatural/demon
popped up, but the twists and turns in the book were better. They were less "out of nowhere" and more like things we could see coming a bit, to build anticipation and suspense. Even when the plot didn't always pan out the way I thought, the anticipation and suspense buildup was really fun.

These books are great -- they're short and enjoyable and thrilling, which is really all I'm looking for in something like this.

fictionaladventures's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.5

A good sequel, though I did love the first one more. 

aspygirlsmom_1995's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

zemthy889's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

badseedgirl's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

In his first novel, [b:I Am Not A Serial Killer|7617119|I Am Not A Serial Killer (John Cleaver, #1)|Dan Wells|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1442065592s/7617119.jpg|6154629], Dan Wells introduces us to John Wayne Cleaver and establishes the world in which he lives, with amazing results. In this second novel Mr. Wells establishes the kind of man John is going to be. I am really enjoying this series. The struggle John continues to face with his sociopathic urges, is a wonder to behold. I think Dan Wells is one of the underappreciated geniuses in the genre.

geekchic394's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Mr Monster was a very dark read. The author basically threw in half a dozen terrible human traits into this book. But that is also what makes it an intriguing read.

As a sequel to "I Am Not a Serial Killer", Mr Monster follows the life of John, a teenager who is constantly being surrounded by death. This book, Mr Monster, tells the story of John's 'inner being' which he calls 'Mr Monster' - hungry for death and destruction.

In this book, there was also more romance than in the previous. John, fearing that Mr Monster will break loose, has set himself apart from people allowing very little interaction with others. However he does form a relationship with Brooke, a girl whom lives very close to him. It is always nice to have some romance in books.

The second half of the book was actually very good. As the story progressed, the mood got darker and there was even a plot twist.

The writing style worked well with this type of book. It was easy to follow and was able to easily express the mood and heighten the tension.

Overall this was a very good read. It was actually better than the first book in the series.