Reviews

Fire on the Mountain by Terry Bisson

its_fuct's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional hopeful informative inspiring fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

5.0

electra_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous inspiring relaxing medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix

5.0

the_morrigan8's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

5.0

mikimeiko's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I enjoy an alternate history as much as the next person, though it sometimes harder to understand the difference when it comes to American history. This time, it wasn't: the 1950s of this universe are so dramatically apart from our own that no one could miss it. I really enjoyed the part set in the "present", Yasmine's and Harriet's story; I could have done without the infinite grandfather's story, or the doctor's letters. Interesting book anyway.

stardustinthepages's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional hopeful inspiring reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes

4.5

utopologist's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This was an excellent little story about what would have happened if John Brown's raid on Harper's Ferry had succeeded and sparked national slave uprisings. Much of the story was in epistolary format, which fit the setting quite well. The weakness of the book is that it isn't long enough to really tell any sort of story in the "present" setting. We get a hint of international socialist countries, the USSA's Five-Year Plan, hydrogen-powered personal vehicles, and a Mars landing, but these things are sort of sprinkled in without much of a compelling storyline. The compelling part is the story from the past and knowing that it resulted in a new country being formed out of the South as well as a socialist US.

luisvilla's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Should be part of the canon

One measure of the best scifi is that it makes you think about your own world through a critical lens. By that measure this is certainly some of the best sci-fi ever written. And it is entertaining to boot.

tamouse's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

This is properly speculative fiction, not science fiction, which it is often listed under because the author writes that. But [b:Fire on the Mountain|6877778|Fire on the Mountain|Terry Bisson|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1328742404s/6877778.jpg|161175] is not about science, nor about the future, but about the past, notably the past of the U.S. prior to the Civil War.

Genre-related things aside, and you should put them *well* aside, this is an astounding piece of fiction. The voices from this work, which is primarily told in letters from the past, gives voice to something I do not get to see very often: Black voices. Especially in the days of outrages against the Black community, against all people of colour, by the forces directly in the employ of White, feudalistic rulers, is a necessary read.

chirson's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This is not a perfect novel: I feel like the parallel between the fire in the belly and the fire on the mountain, and its symbolism, is pointed out a little more than necessary, and the ending feels vaguely incomplete; I kept thinking there had to be a little more. But at the same time it's this book's exact charm; the shoes need to get wet and it takes effort and work, and there's alternative history, and socialism, and flying, and space; it's a cool book and its structure does some very clever things. I'm really happy I could buy and read it.

(And I guess I'd never have come across it without Jo Walton's recommendation.)

polychromatic_hedgehog_parable's review against another edition

Go to review page


WTAF was up with the repeated use of "blood is thicker than water" anachronistically/incorrectly????? I kept waiting for that to be explained but I don't think it ever was? I meant to get a virtual copy and search through all the mentions to make sure I'm right about it.... it genuinely took me out of the narrative every time, honestly by the end I really really thought that there would have been a payoff I was literally dying. Sorry to be so cinema sins about this. THIS IS VERY EMBARRASSING BUT I HAVE FALLEN FOR A LIE. https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/147902/is-the-alleged-original-meaning-of-the-phrase-blood-is-thicker-than-water-real DO NOT MAKE MY SAME MISTAKE. Well. Hopefully this brings me a lot of future peace lmao. I was not able to avert a crisis this time, but perhaps in my future. 
Sorry that's all I was interested in writing about this book, apparently. Hilarious.