Reviews with content warning for Rape - The Sympathizer

Reviews tagging 'Rape'

The Sympathizer by Viet Thanh Nguyen

187 reviews

rei_vitalize's review against another edition

challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

Very philosophical book. I really enjoyed the prose of the book. Not my usual type of book I read but did enjoy it but was often confused by the plot. Also some very weird flashback stories and character very sex obsessed which wasn’t expecting based off the synopsis. Plot was almost like different vignettes about the character. Intrigued enough to read the sequel but don’t think I’d read this one again.

Content Warnings

bmunsh's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Content Warnings

Graphic: Violence and Rape

First and foremost, Viet Nguyen has an incredible grasp of prose and the English language. Very concise, witty, humorous, and playful, without really pushing that boundary of becoming overly verbose.

Although, being overly verbose does become a point later, in the commandant's review of the protagonist’s self-crit.

Overall, it’s an extremely strong novel on the conflicting nature of the protagonist, in both his physical self and personal beliefs. My only real criticisms are 1) The US and South Vietnamese armies are let off pretty easily.

This is the point, that the protagonist has suppressed the atrocities he witnessed, but a naive reader may only takeaway north=reeducation=bad, individual American soldiers committing war crimes=bad. I think there is an excellent analysis via parallelism in the making of The Movie, how the SA scene is committed by Viet Cong, and the protagonist can do nothing to change this scene or the portrayal of Viet Nam in the Movie, with the actuality of his supressed memories of the SA of the agent by the Americans, and how the South Vietnamese did nothing (himself included), to give Nguyen credit. I just think that, while not his job to educate people on the horrors, naive readers may miss the critique of South Viet Nam.

I completely understand why it was written the way it was, but art can be a dangerous tool and some people, especially those who are not well versed on the genocide, may take away the wrong message. 2) Unless you already knew a lot of these events, it may be difficult to understand the gravitas of some points.

For example, if you didn’t know what the Phoenix Program was, or the extent to which American war hawks bombed the country, you may not understand why the North retaliated in the way it did.

The big change in the protagonist’s thoughts is that he becomes a bit disenfranchised with communist thought as he sees what happened when revolution was achieved. This could have been handled a bit better, as his disenfranchisement from communism comes from his observation of systematic reeducation. However, his critique of capitalism largely references individual incidents, which frames the conflict as systematic issues vs isolated incidents. It would have more strongly portrayed the protagonist’s conflict if the story also balanced system vs system. I was very surprised that My Lai or any other the other massacres weren’t referenced (there was one reference made in passing). Once again, it is the whole point of the novel that he represses the atrocities he participated in, but I still think that by not fully describing the horrors that Americans (and the compliance of the South Vietnamese army) committed, the story feels a bit uneven.

jessaustin111's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated

3.0

Content Warnings

amystark's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

Content Warnings

the_ice_within's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

The pace of the book was way too slow. While there were many truisms, and a masterpiece in literature and writing style, the plot itself was almost unbearable to keep up with… as there really wasn’t much of a plot. It was a fascinating depiction of the war, and intellectually and cultural-importance-wise I can see why this book won so many awards, but it was a tough book to get through. Not just because emotionally it was a dark book, but the complex writing and extremely slow pace honestly killed the mood for most of the middle of the book. It truly felt like I was trudging along with the character’s miserable life.

Content Warnings

ceedy's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional informative mysterious sad tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

Content Warnings

cheyison's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Content Warnings

livscosycorner's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Having recently returned to reading - coupled with the fact the author is an academic - The Sympathizer with its dense writing style took me much longer than expected to get through.

I feel my focus was spent wading through all the metaphors, analogies and lofty language and im left unsure if I enjoyed (for lack of a better word - perhaps engrossed by?) the story itself.

Content Warnings

phoebeshigley's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional funny tense medium-paced

4.75

Content Warnings

marijuanerareads's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.5

Content Warnings

More...