Reviews

Galambok alagútja: Történetek az életemből by John le Carré

kaileighrose's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

The chapter on his father was one of the most fascinating stories I’ve ever read.

riverwise's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Mostly short anecdotes. Entertaining, but inessential.

dean299bf's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I love reading his books. Enough said.

raesreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative inspiring reflective medium-paced

4.0

5e6jsb9by's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny reflective relaxing sad slow-paced

schupz's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I admit I've never read a John le Carre' novel. I read this book because he was such a captivating interviewee on Fresh Air. What a vocabulary! What insights! Sometimes while reading I lost the thread of his story, but knew he must be referencing a character or incident from one of his novels. No matter -- it was a slight stumble on the tour through his life. This is a must-read for fans, but won't be a waste if one is simply looking for an interesting memoir.

At some point, I realized most of his major characters were based on actual people. A lot of the dialog, incidents, and emotions in his novels were based in reality. I felt a nonsensical slight disappointment, just like I did when recently reading about director Nicole Holofcener and learning of the autobiographical bent of one of her best movies, "Lovely and Amazing". I suppose on some level I wanted to believe in the overwhelming power of imagination. After considering it awhile, I've conceded the real power is in taking the kernel of truth and growing it into something more multi-faceted and meaningful than could have ever existed before. It will be fun to read the John le Carre' novels now after learning what I have from this memoir.

brucemcguffin's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Each chapter is a stand-alone account of some aspect of the author's life or work. Some were very interesting, others less so.

darwin8u's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

"if you were reporting on human pain, you had a duty to share it"
- John le Carré, quoting a dictum of Graham Greene, in 'The Pigeon Tunnel"

description

First, a disclosure, I was given this book by Viking Books. These types of offers I typically refuse. I don't like feeling under obligation to review or even read a book just because it was given to me. I might do it for friends, but even then, I am VERY picky about what I read. I have thousands of unread books and thousands of others I that are on my radar to read. I usually feel a bit like Melville's Bartleby, aroused only to the level of wanting to reply "I would prefer not to.". But this is John le Carré. Anyone who knows me knows I'VE been pimping John le Carré books for years. My goal is to be a le Carré completest by the end of next year (I still have yet to read [b:The Night Manager|1735330|The Night Manager|John le Carré|https://d2arxad8u2l0g7.cloudfront.net/books/1348724026s/1735330.jpg|79985], [b:The Tailor of Panama|45783|The Tailor of Panama|John le Carré|https://d2arxad8u2l0g7.cloudfront.net/books/1442794935s/45783.jpg|827551], [b:Absolute Friends|18997|Absolute Friends|John le Carré|https://d2arxad8u2l0g7.cloudfront.net/books/1344268584s/18997.jpg|1321387], [b:Our Game|1565754|Our Game|John le Carré|https://d2arxad8u2l0g7.cloudfront.net/books/1185288563s/1565754.jpg|1558337], or [b:The Naive and Sentimental Lover|1589335|The Naive and Sentimental Lover|John le Carré|https://d2arxad8u2l0g7.cloudfront.net/books/1348711060s/1589335.jpg|1217022]) but there is a sadness that comes with finishing, with having no country left to visit or no book left to read. I, however, own them all. Often multiple copies. So, how could I refuse a free le Carré? Also, so I wouldn't feel completely like I was writing for free books, I also went out to purchase the Audiobook so I could listen to le Carré talk about his own life.

Surprisingly, this is le Carré's first memoir. That both feels a bit strange and a bit right. First, le Carré is a master at timing and also understands when is the proper point to introduce a character and how much to show. John le Carré, the pen name for David Cornwell, is often reluctant to do interviews (there is a bit about that in this book) and is a bit publicity shy. He isn't Pynchon or Salinger for sure, but the energy of pimping his stuff and his reluctance sometimes to delve into the narrative of his own life (he worked for awhile for both MI-5 and MI-6) and his relationship with his father all seem to be something he is often reluctant to discuss. Ironically, these two issues feed his fiction heavily. His father and his relationship with his father's ghost seems to push through most of his fiction. So, too, obviously does le Carré time as David Cornwell the spy. There is a thin, unbleached muslin shroud between fact and fiction (le Carré talks about his in this book). Perhaps le Carré's greatest book, [b:A Perfect Spy|19001|A Perfect Spy|John le Carré|https://d2arxad8u2l0g7.cloudfront.net/books/1348765215s/19001.jpg|2492347], which Philip Roth (yes, that Philip Fucking Roth) once called "the best English novel since the War" was grown out of David Cornwell's relationship with his own father.

The memoir itself is filled with anecdotes and loosely goes from past to present, but also breaks time's arrow to describe certain relationships with certain people or movies made of his books. I loved especially the parts of this book where le Carré writes about Graham Greene and the craft of writing. I knew le Carré got around, but after reading the memoir, I can safely say he belongs with George Orwell, Graham Greene, William T. Vollmann, Paul Theroux family of adventure writers whose fiction is informed from the trenches. They don't just know where some bodies are actually buried, they may have seen the corpse AND the murder.

So, why only four stars? Because I'm judging his memoir against his best fiction. This is a fun memoir and very good le Carré. It just doesn't cast its shadow as long as the Karla trilogy, the Perfect Spy, etc.
Again, returning to how this is his first memoir, I wonder why now? I hope he is not done with fiction. I hope this is not him saying, I'm done. He is in his 80s, and after he is done, I'm not sure what to do. We have been waiting for 400 years for another playwright to equal Shakespeare. How many centuries will we have to wait for another le Carré? Dear GOD, I fear way too long.

bookwormmichelle's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This wasn't really a strict memoir, more of a collection of little stories from his life. I mostly got it hoping for Graham Greene stories. There were a few of those, but the entire thing was supremely entertaining anyway. Definitely enjoyed it.

benjclark's review against another edition

Go to review page

John le Carré (David Cornwell) says that every one of his books was titled The Pigeon Tunnel at some point in the early stages. He finally nails a book worthy of the title with this memoir of his writing life, his time working for British Intelligence, and between the lines, a sense of the man behind the stories of espionage and intrigue...

(Continues here)
https://benjaminlclark.com/book-review-the-pigeon-tunnel-by-john-le-carre/