Reviews with content warning for Misogyny - Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men

Reviews tagging 'Misogyny'

Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men by Caroline Criado Pérez

137 reviews

cicizzy's review against another edition

informative reflective sad fast-paced

3.0

I think books like that are really important. We need to know who is (un)intentionally getting discriminated against and in what way, to find ways to fix it. It also gives you a few more arguments for feminism and why it is still needed in 21st century industrial countries. And while the book doesn’t explicitly mentions it, it at least also makes you think about data about other groups like BIPOC people or people with disabilities or also children and elderly.

HOWEVER when I wanted to follow up on a few studies it turned out that some were criticized for being very fishy like the mentioned statistic from GapJumpers also about hiring women or weren’t even published in any way like the „alleged“ study of Speak with a Geek about hiring women. Apparently nobody has ever seen that study. This is a book about the lack correct data! A big message of the book is that we need to look more closely at the data we have and base our decisions on. And yet the data used to base this book on is also incorrect?!

I can’t in good conscience give more than 3 stars for this book because of that.

Content Warnings

kimharper's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative medium-paced

4.5

Content Warnings

rosecoleman's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging inspiring reflective medium-paced

5.0

Blew me away both in a good and very angry way

Content Warnings

hmtierra22's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective medium-paced

4.5

Content Warnings

ashley_krull's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional informative inspiring reflective fast-paced

4.0

Content Warnings

agncl's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative sad medium-paced

5.0

Content Warnings

astudyinfic's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative slow-paced

4.0

Content Warnings

rosalind's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective medium-paced

4.25

Content Warnings

catorureads's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative reflective medium-paced

4.5

Some parts were a bit slower due to the many stats but very interesting, eye-opening and a mustread.

For my fellow Kindle people: the actual book ends at around 65%, all the rest is the bibliography and index of all the research that is mentioned.

Content Warnings

drjoannehill's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

4.5

4.5 ish

How does a "male = neutral" worldview stem from and lead to a lack of data about women's health, finances, political representation, etc because it is wrongly assumed that data about men is relevant to all ... which then has negative consequences for, precisely, women's health, finances, and representation? This book tells us how.

The research that has gone into writing this must be immense, and it is an important book, lots to learn and a great way to show the value of quants or science to feminism and critical research. I read this in the context of a sport science student claiming that feminism is biased in class last week, and that I should have responded that all research is biased, at least feminism acknowledges it.

While Perez's stats/quants research review seems solid, her writing about qualitative research is less so and I felt there was a lack of writing about experience or consequences of the data gap.

Also, it seems in Perez's world, trans and NB people just don't exist. Talk about a data gap? There's a gaping hole in her construction of the world. I don't think there is a single mention in the whole book. Who knows, maybe she worries that acknowledging trans women will break apart the argument that we need data about (cis)women's bodies (especially in health, medicine etc) ... Or maybe she's a TERF, I'm not sure.

In the first chapter is a pretty flimsy definition of sex as "XX or XY chromosomes". Otherwise, there's an ok job of discussing what is sex and what is gender and how a lot of things that are explained (in science or society) as sex/biology are actually related to gender and the social construction of women/femininity, but this is not really what she is trying to do and I had to pick apart a couple of bits because I was looking for it. She seems very keen on evidencing physical differences between men and women, and you have to be careful with this because it is easy for people to use this as evidence that women are lesser than men, that their bodies are not as good - this whole thing is not something discussed in this book.

I would have liked her to acknowledge the existence of women in right wing politics because again in the construction of her world, women make progressive politicians who make things better for all, and I wish that was true but take women in the senior levels of the Tory party over the last 40 years as one example and it sadly isn't true.

Informative, gave me some ideas for teaching and research, but not an academic-level critical text - it isn't meant to be.

Content Warnings

More...