Reviews with content warning for War - 1984 (Unabridged)

- to be aware but not to be awre, to hold the truth and lying at the same process. It is defined by having opposing beliefs at once, believing both are true.

- To believed in lies when they were false.

It was like the Type 1 error of our STATS 10 that failed to reject the p > value when it is less than the alpha (a) means, false. Type 2 error indicates the rejection of p > value when it is higher than the alpha (a), simply says that the hypothesis is true but you choose to reject it either accidentally or intented.

My point is, doublethink has a sense of paradoxical hypocrisy.

They are 5 debatable lessons highlighted by Pageperiscope in George Orwell's 1984:

1. Totalitarianism is dangerous and its power lies in controlling every aspect of citizens lives.

That means, no individuality, no freedom of speech, no freedom of expression, no contradiction towards the law. It was governed in a total centralized control by an autocratic authority. You cannot stand-out from the rest of monotony or else you will be vaporized and ceased to exist.

2. Language is a powerful and indispensable tool of mankind but also potentially destructive. It can be manipulated to control people's thought and action.

Language is the medium for us to communicate and interact with each other yet it is also destructive and misleading when coveted with limitations from which ceased by the corrupted authority itself.

How can we able to express our thoughts and opinions when our choice of words was being limited?

3. Individualism is crucial in resisting totalitarianism, even in the face of pressure to conform.

Humans are unique animals that given the rights for individual expressions and creativity. We cannot undo the things that distinguishes us for being different from each other. We are thinkers! We have ideas! Resisting them is unhealthy.

4. Historical revision is dangerous and be used to manipulate people's understanding of the truth

"Control the past, control the future"

One of the most controversial history of all time in the government of the Philippines is the former President Ferdinand Marcos issue regarding with his family conglomerates and the infamous Martial Law he declared during (year). It was all written in the history that Ferdinand Marcos leads as tyrant and dictatorship from his (years) in the Republic. All of the people believed he was powerful, dominant and a corrupted oppressor. People lived in fear during that time, and up until now the Philippines' citizen were convinced that President Ferdinand Marcos was a manipulative and tyrannical figure of terror during (year). Not until when the following historians and accumulated evidence emerged later on proving that none of the following accusations to the Marco's was true. And it was verified by the authority itself that the following records of his life was nothing but the work of fabrication by the Aquino's--the family who had coveted the presidential administration after overthrowing President Ferdinand Marcos of his seat.

History could alter the fact that we were convinced of in our present state.

5. Loss of privacy and constant surveillance are dangerous and can be serious consequences for individuals and society.

Everyone deserves a private life and should values solitude.

Content Warnings

kailiyahknight's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark hopeful informative mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Content Warnings

sabrinaleaf's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Un livre fort intéressant ou rien ne se passe vraiment. Pas du tout ce que je m’attendais avant de le lire

La première partie consiste plus à expliquer le monde ou le Parti règne.
La deuxième, ces Julia.
La troisième, la défaite intérieure de Winston.

Content Warnings

berratrixie's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.75

orwell absolutely peaks as a writer in 1984, an absolutely thrilling read from front to back. the three-act structure works in the book's favor and helps unravel the plot in an enhanced way.
near the end it is already evident how the story will inevitably end, but reading it, feeling the emotions of our protagonist as

he is put through unimaginable horrors before meeting a death he's been desiring since the beginning of the book

, proved to be a crushing yet rewarding payoff.

Content Warnings

More...