Reviews tagging 'Toxic relationship'

Alone with You in the Ether by Olivie Blake

85 reviews

lifeofchrstnlvly's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.5

Two words: underwhelming and disappointing.

Yeah, it had good mental health representation. I have clinical depression and my husband has bipolar disorder. This book perfectly depicted what living with mental illness feels like. However, it was not the best book just like what most people say.

I know in the acknowledgments Olivie said "This is not a book about how pills are bad, but about finding the acceptance we need to feel both well and alive." I get that. But it's harmful to write a book about characters not willing to take their medications, then only put a one-sentence disclaimer at the end of the book. I know Olivie also suffers from bipolar disorder, so it was quite surprising for me that this is the route she chose.

Yes, acceptance is important. Yes, loving someone completely despite everything is great (though honestly, this is arguable because the book focused too much on sex that it became apparent sex equates to love). However, she had the opportunity to educate people with no mental illness how living with the disease feels like, so why did she miss to grab the opportunity to educate people who DO suffer from mental illness how vital medications and therapy are. There was a part where because of Regan's rage, she was imagining stabbing everyone, but this was not addressed at all in therapy because "love" is apparently enough.

The first 30% of this book, I was in awe of the writing. It's a character-driven book, and I love character-driven books, but it got boring. It became pretentious. There was a point where there were 2 long paragraphs in one page. I was dreading reading it because it was too much. This makes me so scared because I have a copy of The Atlas Six. If this is the way she writes, then I'm doomed.

1.5 stars (1 star because it perfectly described mental illness, 0.5 star since I enjoyed the good writing for the first 30% of the book)

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ericageorge91's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

So…my thoughts: 

Character study - This story was very character-focused with very little plot. I felt like we really got to know Regan and Aldo intimately. However, I wasn’t particularly in love with either of them. I mostly felt ambivalent towards Aldo and then I outright disliked Regan a few times in the book because she baffled me. 

I’m sure it was the point of the story, but she seemed to have no fucking idea what she wanted and it frustrated me to no end.
First, she wanted low stakes in a relationship, which she had with Marc. Then, she resented the lack of jealousy from him (you know…a factor of the low stakes relationship πŸ™„). Then, when Marc does get jealous, Regan gets defensive and is upset that he figured out that she wanted to fuck Aldo before she was ready for Marc to find that out?? Like…WHAT?!? And then, she laments how easy and predictable men were and Aldo did the unpredictable thing and she was mad about it?? Huh??
Regan is the dizziest bitch I have ever read, omg. But, in the end, I disliked the people around Regan (Marc and her mother) even more than I did her, so it bumped my feelings towards her back up to ambivalent.

Storytelling - There was unique storytelling and story structure. I appreciate that the story is divided into six parts like the hexagon theme. That was cute. The first part read like a play. It set the scene with fourth wall breaks with narration and scene descriptions. I did enjoy that aspect. The later parts had a lot of spoken dialogue without quotations and long meandering paragraphs that, I think were meant to depict Regan and Aldo’s racing thoughts? It was kind of confusing, but if that was the point, mission accomplished!

The Romance - I know this was meant to be a love story because I was told so. Do I actually believe in this love story? No. Did I did root for this love story? Also no. I know part of it has to do with me not clicking with the main characters, but part of it was the relationship itself.
By the end of the book, I wasn’t completely convinced that Aldo’s interest in Regan wasn’t an extension of him trying to solve an unsolvable problem to keep his interest and keep him away from drugs. Nor was I persuaded that Regan’s continued interest in Aldo wasn’t just her convincing herself that she wasn’t the impulsive person Marc believed her to be and that this thing with Aldo was built to last.

Light academia? - An ungodly amount of time was devoted to talk of math and bees. Both of which, I care not. This book had the pretentiousness of dark academia with Shakespearan levels of drama. For example, the way that Aldo repeatedly walked around with unsmoked joints, I felt like he had crawled out of the pages of The Fault in Our Stars to tell Regan, β€œIt’s a metaphor” πŸ˜‚ 

Also, I was CRINGING at the moment when he finds her artwork and some couple said it was pretty and we got this lovely internal monologue: 

β€œIt isn’t pretty, [Aldo] wanted to say, it’s lonely, it’s desolate, it’s a chilling portrait of vastness. How ignorant are you to look at this and diminish it to some kind of trinket, are you dead? It’s the human condition! It’s the entire universe itself! It’s the depths of space-time you utter fucking philistine and how dare you, how fucking dare you stand there and fail to weep?” 

And so on and so forth.

I don’t know, man. I’m sure it was supposed to be super deep, but I was just squirming on my couch with second-hand embarrassment πŸ₯΄

Bipolar Representation - From the acknowledgments, I can appreciate how personal this story was to the author who went through her own Regan-like journey. I heard that this book has one of the truest portrayals of bipolar disorder. I am not bipolar myself, so I cannot speak to that, but if you’re looking for a book with good mental health rep, this might be it! Just be sure to read the author’s disclaimer because the main character made choices about her treatment that might not be the right choice for others. 

Final Thoughts - If you love romance, maybe you can view this story as some modern day, Romeo and Juliet-like shit (without the insta-love), because Aldo and Regan seemed to love each other veryintensely. Why? I don’t know. Maybe I wasn’t meant to know. And that’s perfectly okay. 

I think my opinion of the book definitely suffered due to the hype on BookTok. I was expecting to be emotionally ripped apart and gently put back together and for me, this story did not deliver. I think it was an okay book that if you’re bored, you should give it a try πŸ€·πŸΎβ€β™€οΈ

TW: Drugs, addiction (mention), infidelity (emotional, some physical touching and kissing), overdose, toxic mother relationship
Rep: BIPOC characters, bipolar disorder

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

deedeeroo's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional hopeful medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Very interesting and beautiful dive into two complex characters. 

I’m going to mark this as a β€œtoxic relationship” because there’s certainly some unhealthy here, but they’re trying and what else can you ask? 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

larissa_sken's review against another edition

Go to review page

this wasn’t ground breakingly beautiful. it was pretentious and so mind numbing i can’t do it anymore!!! i don’t like the characters, and whilst that’s probably the point, i have been given no reason to root for them despite this. their obsessive and codependent relationship is not romantic, it’s unhealthy and i don’t think either of them even really like each other. i can’t do it anymore and pretend like this is a good book. i feel like me and the 5 star reviewers read something completely different. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

aseel_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

the writing style at the start was a little hard to get through but thankfully that style was only at the start and end, otherwise it was pretty okay and easy to get used to. i liked the characters but i thought at times, their dynamics were a bit cliched or exaggerated, which was a pity 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

hapalyn's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional hopeful inspiring reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

a_alves00's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

nehanaomi's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

At first I felt too stupid to be reading this book but I got the hang of it eventually. The style of writing was so unique and ever-changing, which kept me on my toes. While reading books I typically see it in my head as if it were made into a film or tv show, but it may be impossible to create a faithful adaptation of this story without losing most of what makes it special. 
I think I would hate both of them if they were real people, especially Aldo. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

_simplyrochellereads's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful inspiring reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

πšπšŽπšŸπš’πšŽπš : π™°πš•πš˜πš—πšŽ πš†πš’πšπš‘ 𝚈𝚘𝚞 π™Έπš— πšƒπš‘πšŽ π™΄πšπš‘πšŽπš›β£
πšπšŠπšπš’πš—πš : β˜†β˜†β˜†β£β˜†
⁣
β€œπ™·πšŽ πšπš›πšžπšœπšπšŽπš πš‘πšŽπš›, πš‹πšŽπšŒπšŠπšžπšœπšŽ πš‘πšŽ 𝚠𝚊𝚜 πšŠπšπš›πšŠπš’πš 𝚘𝚏 πš‘πšŽπš›, πš‹πšŽπšŒπšŠπšžπšœπšŽ πš‘πšŽ πš•πš˜πšŸπšŽπš πš‘πšŽπš›.β£β€œ
⁣
π™Όπš’ πšπš’πš›πšœπš πš‹πš˜πš˜πš” πš‹πš’ π™Ύπš•πš’πšŸπšŽ π™±πš•πšŠπš”πšŽ. 𝙸 πšπš’πšπš—β€™πš πš‘πšŠπšπšŽ πš’πš, πš‹πšžπš 𝙸 πšŠπš•πšœπš˜ 𝚠𝚊𝚜 πšŽπš‘πš™πšŽπšŒπšπš’πš—πš 𝚝𝚘 πš‹πšŽ πš˜πšŸπšŽπš›πš•πš’ πš˜πš‹πšŒπšŽπšœπšœπšŽπš πš•πš’πš”πšŽ 𝚊 πš•πš˜πš 𝚘𝚏 πš™πšŽπš˜πš™πš•πšŽ.  π™Έπš πšœπš™πš˜πš”πšŽ 𝚝𝚘 πš–πšŽ πš–πš˜πš›πšŽ πšπš‘πšŠπš— 𝙸 πšπš‘πš˜πšžπšπš‘πš, πš’πš— πšπš‘πšŽ πš‹πšŽπšπš’πš—πš—πš’πš—πš 𝙸 πšπš˜πšžπš—πš πš’πš πš‘πšŠπš›πš 𝚝𝚘 πšŒπš˜πš—πš—πšŽπšŒπš πš‹πšžπš πš˜πš—πšŒπšŽ 𝙸 πšŒπš˜πš—πš—πšŽπšŒπšπšŽπš 𝙸 𝚠𝚊𝚜 πšŠπš•πš• πš’πš— πšŒπš˜πš–πš–πš’πšπšπšŽπš. πšƒπš‘πš’πšœ πš‹πš˜πš˜πš” πš’πšœ πš—πšŽπšžπš›πš˜πšπš’πšŒ πšŠπš—πš πš’πš—πšπšŽπš•πš•πšŽπšŒπšπšžπš• πš πš‘πš’πšŒπš‘ 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚘 πšŠπš™πš™πšŽπšŠπš•πš’πš—πš 𝚝𝚘 πš–πšŽ. 𝙸 πšŽπš–πš™πšŠπšπš‘πš’πš£πšŽπš 𝚜𝚘 πš–πšžπšŒπš‘ πš πš’πšπš‘ πšπšŽπšπšŠπš— πšŠπš—πš πšπš‘πšŽ πšŒπš˜πš–πš–πšžπš—πš’πšŒπšŠπšπš’πš˜πš— 𝚝𝚘 πš‘πšŽπš›πšœπšŽπš•πš πš’πš— πš‘πšŽπš› πš‘πšŽπšŠπš, 𝚊𝚜 𝙸 πš˜πšπšπšŽπš— 𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚘 πš’πš— πš–πš’ πš‘πšŽπšŠπš. 𝙸 πšŠπš‹πšœπš˜πš•πšžπšπšŽπš•πš’ πš•πš˜πšŸπšŽπš π™°πš•πšπš˜ πšŠπš—πš πš‘πš˜πš  πš‘πš’πšœ πš–πš’πš—πš πšŠπš—πš πšπš‘πš˜πšžπšπš‘πš πš™πš›πš˜πšŒπšŽπšœπšœ πš πš˜πš›πš”πšŽπš. ⁣
⁣
𝙸 πš‹πšŽπš•πš’πšŽπšŸπšŽ πš’πš˜πšžβ€™πš›πšŽ πšŽπš’πšπš‘πšŽπš› πš‘πšŽπšŠπš πš˜πšŸπšŽπš› πš‘πšŽπšŠπš•πšœ πš˜πš‹πšŒπšŽπšœπšœπšŽπš πš πš’πšπš‘ πšπš‘πš’πšœ πš‹πš˜πš˜πš” πš˜πš› πš’πš˜πšžβ€™πš›πšŽ πšŒπš˜πš–πš™πš•πšŽπšπšŽπš•πš’ πš—πš˜πš. π™°πšœ πšπš˜πš› πš–πšŽ π™Έβ€™πš– πš—πš˜πš πš˜πšŸπšŽπš›πš•πš’ πš˜πš‹πšŒπšŽπšœπšœπšŽπš, πš‹πšžπš 𝙸 𝚍𝚘 πš•πš˜πšŸπšŽ πšπš‘πšŽ πšœπšπš˜πš›πš’, πšπš‘πšŽ πš πš›πš’πšπš’πš—πš, πšπšŽπšπšŠπš— πšŠπš—πš π™°πš•πšπš˜.


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bbillings23's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings