Reviews with content warning for Confinement - The ones who walk away from Omelas

Reviews tagging 'Confinement'

The ones who walk away from Omelas by Ursula K. Le Guin

27 reviews

kajasversion's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? N/A
Strong character development? N/A
Loveable characters? N/A
Diverse cast of characters? N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

4.5

Beautifully written, made me question my life. It’s 5pm on a tuesday.

Content Warnings

torismazarine's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

Content Warnings

abookwormspov's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? N/A
Strong character development? N/A
Loveable characters? N/A
Diverse cast of characters? N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

4.0

Content Warnings

samdalefox's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective sad fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? N/A
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Absolutely stunning short story. I wasn't sure what all the fuss was about until Le Guin introduced

the endlessly suffering child

. After that I was fully onboard. Her commentary on human nature is true and devastating. The

suffering child

represents any number of real-world examples of the ways people compromise their morals in the name of convenience, comfort, and expediency. This short story ultimately asks us what is the price of utopia? What are the ethics of sacrifice? (As justified by utilitarianism). Are any of us free when one person remains unfree?

At first I thought those that walk away from Omelas would choose to take the place of

the suffering child

, join it, help it, or at the very least openly question the necessity. But no, they walk away. They wash their hands of the moral problem. This is a horrifying reflection of our society today. I wish this story was read by all.

My favourite quotes and another member's review below:

"The trouble is that we have a bad habit, encouraged by pedants and sophisticates, of considering happiness as something rather stupid. This is the treason of the artist: a refusal to admit the banality of evil and the terrible boredom of pain. "

"Happiness is based on a just discrimination of what is necessary, what is neither necessary nor destructive, and what is destructive."

"Their tears at the bitter injustice dry when they begin to perceive the terrible justice of reality, and to accept it. Yet it is their tears and anger, the trying of their generosity and the acceptance of their helplessness, which are perhaps the true source of the splendor of their lives. Theirs is no vapid, irresponsible happiness. They know that they, like the child, are not free."

bitchbane's review
4 ★’s — fantastic short story on morality and the value of human life.

the ones who walk away from omelas presents a unique examination of morality, the value of human life, and the cost of civilization. posing a sort of societal 'trolley problem,' le guin forces readers to consider where they draw the line between acceptable loss and unjustifiable abuse. how do you define right and wrong? what is the real cost of "civilized" society? would you shut up and let a child be neglected and abused to maintain a perfect utopia for everyone else?

this story was much different than what i thought going into it. i expected something heavy on emotional contemplation and what it means to be human, perhaps from the perspective of someone who is trying to decide if they're going to walk away or stay. instead it was more of a parable talking about a broader issue.

interestingly, none of the people who are 'the ones who walk away from omelas' rescued the child. they decided to leave the utopia rather than staying or rescuing the child. this, to me, isn't worthy of dignified praise, they've just made it 'not their problem' anymore.

i thought le guin's approach and conversation about this topic was interesting and new. it's a new take on the trolley problem, discussing ethical dilemmas, and contemplating what humanity is worth. fantastic short story!

Content Warnings

minou_noir's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? N/A
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? N/A
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

I have no words to describe what I'm feeling right now.

This short story is almost 30 pages but the impact it has will haunt you for more than the next 30 years of your life. It's a question posed as a story, where the writer Ursula asks us this: would we let a small innocent child live a lonely and tormented life, if the happiness and prosperity of thousands of people depended on the way he is treated? Does inflicting harm on an innocent life become justified if more than one person gains something from it?

I would highly recommend reading the book yourself because there's no way I can do justice to the way it makes you feel, using a simple review.

I am left thinking if we are living in Omelas, and are voluntarily ignorant of the child in the closet; or if we are the ones who walked away from Omelas, and are living a sad life but feel superior to the ones who stayed because we do not have that guilt on our shoulders.

It might be easy to say that we wouldn't do that to someone at all. We would side with justice and show compassion; but really, looking around us that feeling fades until it is merely left as a question.

Content Warnings