Reviews tagging 'War'

Miss Austen by Gill Hornby

2 reviews

amythebookworm's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced

3.75

I was really excited to read this book because I absolutely love Jane Austen and it also looked like a genuinely entertaining and enjoyable read. However, I was slightly let down.

I really liked/liked the:
  1. period/historical style 
  2. the descriptive style of writing 
  3. telling the story with letters and flashbacks

I think whether or not you like the book totally depends on what you like to read. If you like something with an interesting plot, and I guess, an obvious point to it; this isn’t for you. If your just looking for something to cosy up with on a rainy day and want to know more about Jane Austen and her family, it is.

Follow @amythebookworm for more insightful reviews 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

booksjessreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

lighthearted mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.0

I really wanted to enjoy this book but honestly I did feel a little let down by it. I felt like the characters were honestly so flat, and I felt like the only redeeming quality that this book had was the way in which Hornby portrayed Jane Austen herself. In my mind, Hornby captured the way I imagine her to have been - jovial and outspoken with a strong personality and dry humour. Her character clearly took time to craft, but I felt like this was then at the detriment of other characters and an actually strong plot line.

The constant flicking back and forth with the characters was hard to get used to at first, particularly since it was a slow-paced novel, but I did persevere.  I just wish there had been some more substance to the plot line and the characters. I was also shocked to also see that there was a scene in which furniture had been compared to "slaves in a slave market", as well as continual use of the word "queer". There is absolutely no need to compare furniture to enslaved people and this casual racism should have been picked up by editors and publishers, and should not have even been used in the very first place by the author. In regards to the term "queer", this is also completely uncalled for. I appreciate that hundreds of years ago, it was used to mean something different, but in a historical fiction novel written in 2020, there are lots of other words you can use to say 'weird' or 'unusual' whilst still using language that sounds as though it fits that specific time period.

To put it in one sentence, the only redeeming quality of this book was the way the author portrayed Jane Austen's character. However, if we are being completely honest, you can completely gauge that just by reading her work instead, rather than wasting your time reading this.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...