Scan barcode
librarymouse's review against another edition
adventurous
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.0
This is every bit what I'd expect of an adventure novel from the 1880s. Surprisingly, the novel had far less overt hate for Africans and far less overt racism, as compared to a book like Doctor Doolittle, published in the 1920s. I'm not sure that I necessarily enjoyed it, but the form and mode of storytelling were interesting, and the travel sections were engaging. There is quite a lot of murder, excessive game hunting, killing for ivory, and consumption of meat in this book, as well as detailed description and discussion of corpses.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Animal death, Racism, Animal cruelty, Murder, Violence, War, Death, Gore, Child death, Colonisation, Racial slurs, Misogyny, and Gun violence
Moderate: Injury/Injury detail
taylarae's review against another edition
adventurous
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.25
It was fine. As a historical device, It can give a lot of context into how those in Victorian-era England viewed Southern Africa and other colonies. But it is littered with very racist views and words, which is to be expected from it, but the constant use of the k-word did make it very difficult to read for me personally.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Racial slurs, Racism, Death, Colonisation, and Violence
Moderate: Misogyny, Animal death, and Injury/Injury detail
amphipodgirl's review against another edition
adventurous
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
This is a hard one to rate. It was written in 1885 by a white Englishman who had worked in the colonizing force in southern Africa, and it is just as racist, sexist, imperialist, and colonialist as that would lead you to expect. He just has no respect for people of African descent or the cultures of Africa, and when one of them does get a compliment it is extremely back-handed. But it's a compelling adventure tale, and the writing is much more straightforward than I expected -- I had braced myself for Dickensian levels of sentence complexity, and it's a lot more modern-feeling than that.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Racism, Racial slurs, Colonisation, War, Sexism, Confinement, Death, and Blood
chalkletters's review against another edition
adventurous
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.5
King Solomon’s Mines was the ‘colonial’ half of a post/colonial literature module that I studied at university, and there’s certainly a lot to say about the colonialism and the treatment of race in the novel. At the time, I was surprised to find that, despite that, it’s a very easy book to read. The beautiful descriptions of the landscape reminded me of Island, though King Solomon’s Mines is a great deal more violent. Brief, brutal moments really make an impact, despite the fact that they’re not dwelt upon by any of the surviving characters. Before the war was even declared, I numbered the body count at 108.
H Rider Haggard’s characters are enjoyable, but none of them really has an arc of development throughout the novel. The three British men are much the same at the end of King Solomon’s Mines as they were at the beginning, despite having undergone a unique adventure. Even Umbopa, whose circumstances change the most, is essentially the same person throughout. I haven’t read enough adventure stories to know whether this is typical, but I didn’t feel disappointed by it. King Solomon’s Mines is driven by plot, not character, and H Rider Haggard certainly delivers on the adventure premise.
The thing that most surprised me was how interested I was in the tactics of the battles. This isn’t something that I usually look for in books; as someone who struggles to visualise in much detail, overly complicated fight sequences can leave me confused and disorientated. But H Rider Haggard makes everything very simple and clear, and is thus able to establish the stakes in a way that might otherwise have gone over my head.
I don’t know if anything from King Solomon’s Mines will really stay with me over time, but it was interesting to revisit it! It’s made me curious about adding more classic adventure stories to my TBR, simply because it’s not a genre that I have a lot of history with.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Animal death, Death, Gun violence, Murder, and Racism
More...