Scan barcode
c_lox's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Animal death and Suicide
payeswoods's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
“Adults follow paths. Children explore.”
The climax did not wow me, even though I really really wanted it to. The heroic event in this is too similar to Narnia’s. It was too obvious for me and I would have liked more wonder. The unexplained mythology is unfortunate, but I don’t think it harms the novel in an unforgiving way.
Graphic: Body horror, Child abuse, Child death, Death, Infidelity, and Suicide
Minor: Confinement
moontayne's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
I felt my own whimsy being channeled through the seven year old main character. It wasn't immediate - I didn't feel part of the book in the more nonfiction section, with the opal miner and his kitten, but I did feel sympathy. But as they adventured on the farmland, I felt myself curious about the Hempstock family, scared for the child (I don't think his name was mentioned) as Ursula Monkton gained influence, and I felt safe and comfortable in the sections on the Hempstock farm.
I forgot how much emotion I could feel while reading, but this book made me feel a lot. I don't think I have a great imagination, and when I close my eyes I don't see anything, but I think my heart can travel very far and do very well at experiencing other's perspectives and emotions. This book was magical for that. And I love love love that the pulled-up garden kitten was still at the farm when he returned.
It would be lovely to have somewhere like the Hempstock farm. Not a home, because to me (and I imagine the main character), homes are sometimes tumultuous and sad, though they are where we return to; the Hempstock farm is more a place of permanent stability and comfort, for the seven-year-old kid scared of his nanny, the 22 year old scared of how open the future is (me! me!), or the 40 year old struggling with loss of things that felt forever. I might not have a physical place like the Hempstock farm, but I do have this book, and the wonder it made me feel. Maybe I'll re-read it in the future. I'd like to read some other Neil Gaiman books as well, if they have a similar wonder and fantasy to them.
Anyways I think I want my book reviews to be a bit longer, like this one, instead of silly like my movie reviews. It's a bit more personal, and more for my own collection to remember how books made me feel, but isn't that the goal of a review? But I think it's cool to share my journal-y side of myself to those interested in reading it (hi kinnick!). Hopefully this is the first of many books I read, where I can do some good thinking and feeling, because I don't like how much I consume now that doesn't require me to think or feel. Here's to more good books!
Favorite quotes:
"I wish I could purr. I would have purred then." (106)
"Inside, they look just like they always have. Like they did when they were your age. Truth is, there aren't any grown-ups. Not one, in the whole wide world." (108)
Moderate: Body horror, Child abuse, and Suicide
soggycedar's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Child abuse, Confinement, Physical abuse, and Suicide
Moderate: Body horror, Child death, Infidelity, Torture, and Blood
Minor: Animal death
jefferz's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
The main highlight of the novel is Gaiman’s effective juxtaposition of how events or people are seen and interpreted between children and adults. Starting with the narrator and his father’s discovery of a man who committed suicide in their stolen car, the story gradually leans towards a fantasy angle involving magic, monsters, and other worlds. Due to his young age as well as how much time has passed since the events occurred, you’re left wondering how much of the story was real (if any at all) or how much was a child’s imagination running wild while scared. I enjoyed reading this book from a critical reading standpoint (to a point), attempting to analyze and interpret how these different occurrences could’ve happened if they were instead experienced by an adult.
The prose is mostly functional and not overly lyrical, but has a frank, matter of fact character voice that I like that is occasionally quite poetic. I’ve seen a bunch of reviews criticizing that the narrator’s character is bland and the weakest element of the story. However, I personally thought it was well done and captured the nature of an introverted, book-loving shy child which served as a good foil to “neighbor” Lettie’s vibrance or really all of the Hemstock family’s contrasting dynamics. The prologue chapter featuring the narrator as a middle-aged adult perfectly sets the simple, yet reflective tone and is the hook that got me excited for the impending and highlighted darkness and commentary on what makes us human.
Unfortunately as the story progressed, I increasingly felt like I wasn’t going to get that. Perhaps I have darker standards than the norm or expected far worse based on reviews mentioning child abuse/neglect angle, but there’s really only one notable scene involving child abuse/violence and rest being familial discourse and drama. As the tense atmosphere grows, the story leans heavier into fantasy elements that feel sporadic and random. On one hand I understand that Gaiman is trying to capture the wild imagination and mind of a child. However the story leans into the unexplainable otherworldly angle so hard that I found it increasingly difficult to follow where the plot and themes were going. I previously reviewed Kazuo Ishiguro’s Klara and the Sun which was another novel that highlighted dark parental topics through the eyes of a child which I found very effective so I’m not against the concept, but the execution of this one felt messy and unfocused.
The metaphorical symbolism of what the narrator experienced grew fainter and fainter, particularly in the second half of the book when Lettie confronts the main antagonist of the story. The sequence felt unnecessarily drawn out (particularly everything involving the varmites after) to stretch the story out of the novella category and to add a call back to the book’s title. In my opinion, that entire run of 40 pages could’ve been cut entirely and all of the narrator’s great internalized fears manifested into reality could’ve been reworked into the confrontation with the main antagonist. And to be sure there were some great quotes, but they felt like a series of beautiful vignettes that were moving on their own while messy and vague when strung together. As the last few chapters ended, I was left baffled thinking “well that was something I guess”.
Despite being well-written and conceptually interesting, I felt like I missed something both from an emotional angle and a literary analysis angle. What started off tonally solid just grew more outlandish and abstract as it progressed and there’s frankly some very strange and bizarre choices that almost seem comedic, in direct contrast to the tone this book is going for. This is my first real Neil Gaiman read (I loved watching the adaptation of Good Omens and the very little I read of American gods years ago) and I can tell that nearly all my personal nitpicks with The Ocean At the End of the Lane has to do with the story and ideas, not Gaiman’s actual writing or style. Case and point, I loved the prologue and epilogue more than the rest of the book. My overall impression is that the book was quite messy and jarring, which somewhat makes sense after reading Gaiman’s acknowledgements covering the novel’s origin of a short story that was reworked and expanded to be a novel; the original short story synopsis sounded like it would’ve been much more to my taste with less distracting elements.
Moderate: Child abuse, Death, Infidelity, Suicide, and Gaslighting
Minor: Sexual content
lb_1903's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
I was lucky to see the stage production of this twice, it was breathtaking, and made me love the book even more.
Moderate: Body horror, Child abuse, Infidelity, and Suicide
louiepotterbook's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Body horror, Child abuse, Death, Infidelity, Suicide, Violence, and Injury/Injury detail
saraborkowski's review
Graphic: Suicide
ashleyj_reads's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Four stars only because I want to know more about the Hempstocks. I understand why we’re not told more, but that’s not the point here. I’m very curious and one star’s worth of upset about it.
This is well-written: seamless timeline changes, and action to thought/dialogue pieces. The not magic is beautifully created and experienced by character and reader.
What a wild, fascinating, and mind boggling experience for a child!! It’s no wonder he doesn’t know where home is as an adult.
Moderate: Child abuse and Suicide
Minor: Bullying, Death, Infidelity, and Death of parent
thesvnthsense's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.75
Graphic: Body horror, Child abuse, and Death
Moderate: Animal death, Infidelity, and Suicide
Minor: Sexual content