Scan barcode
eososray's review against another edition
3.0
I enjoy these mysteries. They are light, fun and easy to read. I have not been a fan of Baldwins romance, finding it difficult to envision how it could play out like this.
I do like the leper's as the focal point of the story but the fortuitous ending was a little much.
I do like the leper's as the focal point of the story but the fortuitous ending was a little much.
smcleish's review
4.0
Originally published on my blog here in December 1999.
The treatment of lepers in the medieval period is something distasteful to a modern viewpoint, an example of extreme inhumanity driven by fear. It is a part of our history which makes the homophobia sparked by AIDS pale into insignificance (though parallels can be drawn); and it went on for hundreds of years. Such a terrible disease, not just incurable (at the time), but bringing horrific deformity, must have been (they thought) a punishment from God, a judgement for some terrible sin. It didn't take much imagination to make the assumption that lepers were monsters of depravity. This provided the excuse for persecution, as the supposed extreme infectiousness of the disease provided the excuse for making lepers into outcasts.
The official attitude of the church was slightly different, and it was thought to be a duty to provide some sort of shelter, in the form of leper hospitals. These were often pretty squalid, and little care and treatment could be provided. They also formed focal points for persecution, and massacres of lepers are recorded in times of misfortune, alongside persecution of Jews.
This is a sombre subject for a crime novel, and is reasonably well handled by Jecks. It is the attempts to relieve the mood with low comedy that are the biggest failures - a clumsy dog and its battle with a tyrannical maidservant. In the end, they (and the romantic subplot) spoil the novel. Of course, it is intended as a piece of entertainment, and it succeeds on this level, but it could have been much more without the soft edges.
The treatment of lepers in the medieval period is something distasteful to a modern viewpoint, an example of extreme inhumanity driven by fear. It is a part of our history which makes the homophobia sparked by AIDS pale into insignificance (though parallels can be drawn); and it went on for hundreds of years. Such a terrible disease, not just incurable (at the time), but bringing horrific deformity, must have been (they thought) a punishment from God, a judgement for some terrible sin. It didn't take much imagination to make the assumption that lepers were monsters of depravity. This provided the excuse for persecution, as the supposed extreme infectiousness of the disease provided the excuse for making lepers into outcasts.
The official attitude of the church was slightly different, and it was thought to be a duty to provide some sort of shelter, in the form of leper hospitals. These were often pretty squalid, and little care and treatment could be provided. They also formed focal points for persecution, and massacres of lepers are recorded in times of misfortune, alongside persecution of Jews.
This is a sombre subject for a crime novel, and is reasonably well handled by Jecks. It is the attempts to relieve the mood with low comedy that are the biggest failures - a clumsy dog and its battle with a tyrannical maidservant. In the end, they (and the romantic subplot) spoil the novel. Of course, it is intended as a piece of entertainment, and it succeeds on this level, but it could have been much more without the soft edges.
lucyb's review
This was a pleasant mystery, with fine characterizations. The plot was, perhaps, a bit labored, but the novel is still enjoyable. I appreciated that Jecks makes his characters well-rounded and complex, with lively interior lives, and that he has a cast drawn from all levels of society, not just the elites. (Neither of these things is to be taken for granted in historical fiction set in the Middle Ages, in my experience!) I found the assumption that strict isolation of lepers and loathing towards them were normative to be grating... but this is an interpretative assumption that's been shared by many historians, and Jecks has clearly done his research. Also, the emotional responses of individual characters are very thoughtfully treated. Full disclosure: I'm probably more sensitive to depictions of medieval leprosy than most, because it's what I study... which is why I picked up this novel. I liked it much better than the first in the series (which I read, or at least started, years ago.)
More...