Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.52 AVERAGE
3.52 AVERAGE
dark
mysterious
reflective
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
Arnott isn't very good at endings. Also, the 'twist' in this tale was blatantly obvious for a long time before it happened. Those are my only criticisms, though. I loved everything else about this book.
This is the story of three men who don't meet until the end of the book, but whose lives are all impacted by one incident: the killing of coppers of the title. It takes place in the same universe as The Long Firm and a few of the characters from that book are mentioned. Only Teddy Thursby and George Mooney actually appear.
Arnott uses memorable historical events and places his characters and events within them. I've heard a lot about the '66 world cup final over my life: particularly from my dad who was there. I visited Greenham Common in the mid-nineties which was very similar to the description here of Molesworth. I remember football hooliganism and the riots, too, of course. There was a dark nostalgia to reading this.
It covers about thirty years and explores the lives, relationships and psyches of the central characters, and their relationships with the times through which they live. One of the 'topics' is police corruption in the nineteen seventies, so there were similarities to David Peace's Red Riding quartet. I would certainly recommend those to anyone who enjoyed this. They are very Yorkshire-set books, though, and here -- once again -- Arnott uses London almost as a character in itself. It is not the only setting this time and the countryside is well rendered, too.
I've read a lot of Arnott in a short period which is something I try to avoid doing with any author since I overdosed on Atwood after university graduation and had to wait a decade and a half before I read her again. I'm not saturated by Arnott yet, although I can see themes, patterns and common weaknesses in his work. I'm going to have a break for a while but I will certainly read his books in the future.
This is the story of three men who don't meet until the end of the book, but whose lives are all impacted by one incident: the killing of coppers of the title. It takes place in the same universe as The Long Firm and a few of the characters from that book are mentioned. Only Teddy Thursby and George Mooney actually appear.
Arnott uses memorable historical events and places his characters and events within them. I've heard a lot about the '66 world cup final over my life: particularly from my dad who was there. I visited Greenham Common in the mid-nineties which was very similar to the description here of Molesworth. I remember football hooliganism and the riots, too, of course. There was a dark nostalgia to reading this.
It covers about thirty years and explores the lives, relationships and psyches of the central characters, and their relationships with the times through which they live. One of the 'topics' is police corruption in the nineteen seventies, so there were similarities to David Peace's Red Riding quartet. I would certainly recommend those to anyone who enjoyed this. They are very Yorkshire-set books, though, and here -- once again -- Arnott uses London almost as a character in itself. It is not the only setting this time and the countryside is well rendered, too.
I've read a lot of Arnott in a short period which is something I try to avoid doing with any author since I overdosed on Atwood after university graduation and had to wait a decade and a half before I read her again. I'm not saturated by Arnott yet, although I can see themes, patterns and common weaknesses in his work. I'm going to have a break for a while but I will certainly read his books in the future.
dark
emotional
mysterious
sad
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
I’m glad I finally read this after it’s been on my to read pile for 20y! I can’t place exactly what I like about Arnott’s writing, but I do love it. Characters? Characterisation? The experiences they have and what they do with them? It’s a sad book, the lives of the characters are sad. But that I think shows the empathy the reader feels with the characters, who aren’t good people, and that’s down to the writing.
This review sums it up for me: https://app.thestorygraph.com/reviews/58dd097c-7ca8-46ea-9550-d7a32e56a8a8
There’s a murder, that has closure at the end by the death of the murderer - but that just leaves the cop facing an empty future.
The cop who wants to be good people but really isn’t; or is he because of his desperate want to be despite his actions .. what makes a person good?
The murderer, the cop killer, is the one who seems to have had the happiest life and seems to get his own closure at the end.
Then there’s the reporter who is also a murderer and gets away with it but he doesn’t like being a murderer and so he doesn’t have a happy end either.
Not really sure where I’m going with this.
This review sums it up for me: https://app.thestorygraph.com/reviews/58dd097c-7ca8-46ea-9550-d7a32e56a8a8
The cop who wants to be good people but really isn’t; or is he because of his desperate want to be despite his actions .. what makes a person good?
The murderer, the cop killer, is the one who seems to have had the happiest life and seems to get his own closure at the end.
Then there’s the reporter who is also a murderer and gets away with it but he doesn’t like being a murderer and so he doesn’t have a happy end either.
Not really sure where I’m going with this.
a bit dull - full review here
http://0651frombrighton.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/he-kills-coppers-jake-arnott.html
http://0651frombrighton.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/he-kills-coppers-jake-arnott.html
If prime James Ellroy wrote an English crime novel. Just a superbly written tale. I loved “The Long Firm” but put off read this for ten (!) years because it wasn’t a direct sequel to Harry Starks’ story. It may not directly feature Starks but it is his world, the one he helped create and the same that Margaret Thatcher ruthlessly rebooted with a Noah-like flood of conservatism. Great book.
Books [and movies] have sort of taken the back seat for the past 2/3 weeks. Moving across country can do that to your attention span [too anxious to read for any great length of time] or energy [too worn out at night to read for any great length of time]. So, my 2011 total has kind of taken a dive the past month. HE KILLS COPPERS by Jake Arnott is a British crime novel set mostly in the 1960s/1970s [with a dash of 1985 at the end] and tells the stories of three individuals--a cop killing criminal, a cop who attempts to catch him and the sleazy reporter who writes about the case in the lurid purple prose of his newspaper. No nonsense writing from Arnott that I appreciate. It's always interesting to see how really sparse writing style works perfectly with hard-boiled crime fiction. Flowery prose just would feel so completely wrong in a story like HE KILLS COPPERS. The book goes off the rails every now and then, mostly due to Arnott wanting to set up the era or expand on something from that particular time and place. Also, every time it jumps forward in time, it takes a bit before the story catches back up to the characters.
In the followup to his acclaimed debut (The Long Firm), Arnott uses the real case of cop-killer Harry Roberts as the basis for a three-voiced narrative which touches upon British social changes from 1966-1985. Using multiple voices worked fairly well in that first book, and here Arnott uses those of Billy Porter, a young army veteran turned small time thief, Frank Taylor, an ambitious policeman, and Tony Meehan, a young newspaper reporter and closet homosexual. The book starts in London's summer of 1966-the city throbs with World Cup fever and is starting to show signs of being the swinging place of legend. However, in Arnott's world, it's less the place of late-'60s Carnaby St. Austin Powers fun than it is of sleazy Soho, with clip joints run by Maltese pimps. When Billy-who probably has post-traumatic stress disorder from his service in anti-Communist jungle patrols in Malaya-teams up with two losers to rob a bank, things go awry and three policemen are shot dead. Frank and Tony quickly arrive on the scene in their respective capacities, and the trio are momentarily linked before Arnott releases them to drift for nineteen years until they are brought together once again.
After the killings, Billy's story becomes one of survival. As public enemy number one, he manages to evade capture for many years, living on the fringes of society, only to be drawn back to London. The sequences showing Billy's life at fairgrounds, then with travelers, and then later with Class War activists put Arnott's skill on full display, and are possibly the most compelling parts of the book. Meanwhile, Frank makes his way up the ranks, and through a loveless marriage, with Billy Porter as his great white whale. Over the years, through his eyes, we are given a panoramic view of the modernization of British policing. This starts in '66 with police corruption, the influence of Masons on the force, then later, the increased militarization of police, their use as
auxiliaries to crush the mining strikes in the north, riot control techniques of the early '80s,the so called "Battle of the Beanfield" in which they literally ran amok in attacking mostly peaceful and unresisting protesters. Tony's story is less compelling than the other two, as it mostly involves him trying become a legitimate journalist, and his relationship with a gossipy peer. Perhaps to compensate, Arnott bestows a manner of psychopathy upon Tony which doesn't ever seem justified, nor does it work particularly well in the context of the story.
Arnott's doing several things at once, which may not be to everyone's tastes. He's painting sympathetic psychological portraits of three disturbed men, he's telling crime story based loosely on a true story, and he's giving a broad view of part of Britain's social history. In this scheme, the cop-killing becomes the point at which post-WWII giddiness and innocence is lost, and the dirty business of modern Britain (especially Thatcherism) starts. It's obviously an oversimplification, but those who like their crime stories to have something more behind them may well enjoy it. Although his thematic strokes are rather broad, Arnott once again shows his mastery of subcultural details in scenes showing pinball playing mods popping purple hearts, "Liquidator" booming over the tannoy at Chelsea's ground and the subsequent terrace battles, the insular world of the fairground lifers, the empty rebellion of Class War types, and so on. Obviously, one's enjoyment of all this depends greatly on how immersed on is in British popular culture and recent history, but those who are will find plenty to like.
After the killings, Billy's story becomes one of survival. As public enemy number one, he manages to evade capture for many years, living on the fringes of society, only to be drawn back to London. The sequences showing Billy's life at fairgrounds, then with travelers, and then later with Class War activists put Arnott's skill on full display, and are possibly the most compelling parts of the book. Meanwhile, Frank makes his way up the ranks, and through a loveless marriage, with Billy Porter as his great white whale. Over the years, through his eyes, we are given a panoramic view of the modernization of British policing. This starts in '66 with police corruption, the influence of Masons on the force, then later, the increased militarization of police, their use as
auxiliaries to crush the mining strikes in the north, riot control techniques of the early '80s,the so called "Battle of the Beanfield" in which they literally ran amok in attacking mostly peaceful and unresisting protesters. Tony's story is less compelling than the other two, as it mostly involves him trying become a legitimate journalist, and his relationship with a gossipy peer. Perhaps to compensate, Arnott bestows a manner of psychopathy upon Tony which doesn't ever seem justified, nor does it work particularly well in the context of the story.
Arnott's doing several things at once, which may not be to everyone's tastes. He's painting sympathetic psychological portraits of three disturbed men, he's telling crime story based loosely on a true story, and he's giving a broad view of part of Britain's social history. In this scheme, the cop-killing becomes the point at which post-WWII giddiness and innocence is lost, and the dirty business of modern Britain (especially Thatcherism) starts. It's obviously an oversimplification, but those who like their crime stories to have something more behind them may well enjoy it. Although his thematic strokes are rather broad, Arnott once again shows his mastery of subcultural details in scenes showing pinball playing mods popping purple hearts, "Liquidator" booming over the tannoy at Chelsea's ground and the subsequent terrace battles, the insular world of the fairground lifers, the empty rebellion of Class War types, and so on. Obviously, one's enjoyment of all this depends greatly on how immersed on is in British popular culture and recent history, but those who are will find plenty to like.